Issue details
RTS SECOND REVIEW: STATEMENT OF SUB-REGIONAL COLLABORATION
Denbighshire County Council (DCC) endorsed the Regional Technical
Statement Second Review (RTS 2) on 26th January 2021. The RTS 2 projects future
demand for aggregates so that mineral development can be planned for in a managed
and proportionate way by Local Planning Authorities (LPAs). It provides
strategic recommendations to each LPA regarding their apportionments and
indicates the likelihood of new allocations, which may need to be made in the
next LDP, to meet the predicted future demand throughout the relevant plan
period.
For the
purpose of strategic minerals planning, the RTS 2 establishes a set of
sub-regions in Wales that are based on a number of factors such as, type of
mineral, supply patterns, minimal movement of aggregates or distinctive market
areas. The Counties of Denbighshire, Flintshire and Wrexham form the ‘North
East Wales’ sub-region, whilst the Counties of Conwy, Gwynedd, Anglesey and the
Snowdonia National Park Authority are grouped as ‘North West Wales’ sub-region.
The RTS 2,
see paragraph 1.27, introduces the requirement for all LPAs in each sub-region
to prepare a Statement of Sub-Regional Collaboration (SSRC), which does not
only ensure that the overall sub-regional apportionments, as set out in the
document for every constituent county, are met but also be used as crucial
evidence for demonstrating that the adopted (or forthcoming Local Development
Plan) will provide the objectively assessed need for minerals over the plan
period. Any Statement of Sub-Regional Collaboration is going to be a material
planning consideration in the determination of planning applications.
Decision type: Non-key
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Notice of proposed decision first published: 22/04/2021
Decision due: 22 May 2021 by Lead Member for Health and Social Care
Lead member: Lead Member for Health and Social Care
Consultees
The RTS 2 and
inter-authority collaboration have extensively been discussed at several
meetings of the Strategic Planning Group (SPG) in October 2020, November 2020
and March 2021. Members were invited to express their views on several versions
of the agreement, including the option to refuse any form of inter-authority
collaboration.
Decisions
Documents