Agenda item
APPLICATION NO. 02/2016/0422/PF - LAND AT GLASDIR FARM, RUTHIN
- Meeting of Planning Committee, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 9.30 am (Item 9.)
- View the declarations of interest for item 9.
To consider an application for demolition of existing farmhouse and associated outbuildings, and
construction of new school accommodating two primary schools with associated
external works, including formation of new vehicular and pedestrian accesses,
improvements to existing footpath, on-site parking with drop off area, external
play and games areas, playing field, wildlife gardens and shelters, landscaping
and boundary fencing, and surface water drainage works involving filter drains
and soakaways at land at Glasdir Farm, Ruthin (copy attached).
Minutes:
[Councillor Huw Hilditch-Roberts declared a
personal interest in this item because he was Chair of Governors of Ysgol Pen Barras and parent of a child in the school. Councillor Huw Williams declared a personal interest
because he was parent of a child attending Ysgol Pen Barras. Councillor Julian Thompson-Hill declared a
personal and prejudicial interest because he was a member of the Project Board
and Lead Member for submitting the application and he left the meeting whilst
the application was being considered.]
An application was submitted for demolition of
existing farmhouse and associated outbuildings, and construction of new school
accommodating two primary schools with associated external works, including
formation of new vehicular and pedestrian accesses, improvements to existing
footpath, on-site parking with drop off areas, external play and games areas,
playing field, wildlife gardens and shelters, landscaping and boundary fencing,
and surface water drainage works involving filter drains and soakaways at land
at Glasdir Farm, Ruthin.
General Debate – Councillor Huw Hilditch-Roberts (Local Member)
fully supported the much needed school development in order to provide an
excellent learning environment for the benefit of local children which had been
a long time coming. He paid credit to
both schools who were performing well despite difficult conditions within the
existing facilities. Given the location
of the proposed new school Councillor Huw Hilditch-Roberts sought a number of
assurances regarding (1) highway issues and traffic management – in particular
volume of traffic and congestion, roundabout issues and access from Glasdir; (2) drainage and flooding given that the
development was located in a flood zone, and (3) how the concerns of neighbours
had been addressed. Councillor David
Smith (Local Member) also welcomed the school development highlighting the
inadequacies of the existing facilities and ongoing work over many years in
order to turn the vision into reality.
Councillor Eryl Williams, Lead Member for
Education reiterated the need for the new schools in order to provide modern,
fit for purpose educational facilities and he reported upon the Council’s
modernising education programme and vision for Denbighshire. He referred to an ‘Open Day’ for local
residents which had been held to provide details of the development and allay
concerns, including flooding and highways.
Highway and Planning Officers responded to the
questions raised as follows –
(1) Highways – work had been ongoing for a number
of years regarding various highway options.
Reference was made to a number of highway works to be completed prior to
the occupation of the school including a new controlled crossing on Denbigh
Road and widening of the footway on the site side of the highway, and an order
for parking restrictions adjacent to the site being advertised. In response to Ruthin Town Council’s
suggestion that vehicles leaving the site should turn left only, that option
had been considered as part of the transport assessment and was found to have a
detrimental effect on the A525 roundabout.
The large car park and dropping off area proposed within the site
complied with parking standards.
Consequently officers considered the proposals would not have an
unacceptable impact on the local highway network – in addition, pressure on the
A494 trunk road would be alleviated by the proposed highways measures. Councillor Huw Hilditch-Roberts sought further
assurances that the impact of the livestock market had been considered and that
sufficient safety measures had been included to ensure a safe walking route for
children. It was explained that the main
problem with the cattle market was at weekends and work was ongoing to work
with them to improve site management with parking restrictions being considered
as part of the scheme. The measures
introduced to protect pedestrians on the footway were considered acceptable
(2) Drainage (including flooding) – officers
reported upon the extensive flood modelling work undertaken for the scheme and
the drainage strategy for the site and elaborated upon the measures being
introduced to protect against flooding which included measures for water to be
retained on the sports pitch, additional bunding to
divert flood water away and raising of the school onto higher ground –
assurances were provided that much multi-agency work had been carried out in
preparation for the application and the flood management plan had been
specifically designed for the whole area and not just the school development
site
(3) Residential Amenity – reference was made to the
wealth of public engagement and consultation on the proposed development and it
was testament to that process that only two objection letters had been received
given the size of the scheme – discussions had taken place with those residents
and steps had been taken to mitigate their concerns including removal of two
windows from key elevations and adding acoustic bunds and barriers with
additional landscaping. It was considered
that the proposals would not have an unacceptable impact on residential amenity
and it should be appreciated that the land had been allocated for school
development.
Councillor Mark Young sought assurances
regarding maintenance of the waterways highlighting the need for a commitment
to meet that responsibility. Councillor
Stuart Davies referred to previous ambiguity in this area, particularly
following flooding of the Glasdir Estate in 2012,
advising that it had since been established that the landowner was
responsible. He felt it was imperative
that it was made clear within the process who was responsible, particularly
given past events and that the proposed development was in a flood zone. Whilst acknowledging members’ concerns
officers advised they were not planning issues for consideration with the
application and it was suggested that the relevant scrutiny committee would be
best placed to scrutinise arrangements for the responsibility and maintenance
of watercourses in the area. Officers further
advised that the technical information, statutory consultee responses and flood
alleviation document indicated that the development could proceed. Assurances were also provided that there was
an ongoing dialogue between the Council, Natural Resources Wales and the
housing developer at Glasdir regarding flood
alleviation features in the area.
Officers responded to questions raised during
further debate advising that –
·
there
would be security fencing around the site managed by the school
·
raising of
the land had been detailed in the Flood Consequence Assessment and included
within the conditions as detailed in pages 54 and 55 of the report
·
an
umbrella insurance covered the Council’s assets and property portfolio, and
·
given the
directives outside of the planning process for dealing with protected species
officers cautioned against Councillor Huw Hilditch-Roberts’s
suggestion to remove the condition relating to the immediate cessation of work
should any Great Crested Newts be found (as detailed in the supplementary
papers) – instead officers provided assurances that they would work closely
with the relevant authorities to ensure ongoing dialogue and mitigate any risk
of delay
Proposal – Councillor Huw Hildtich-Roberts
proposed, seconded by Councillor Barry Mellor that the application be granted.
VOTE:
GRANT – 22
REFUSE – 0
ABSTAIN – 1
RESOLVED that permission be GRANTED in accordance with officer recommendation as detailed
within the report and supplementary papers.
Supporting documents:
- ITEM 6 - LAND AT GLASDIR FARM, item 9. PDF 114 KB
- ITEM 6 - LAND AT GLASDIR FARM APPENDIX, item 9. PDF 1 MB