Agenda item
CSSIW REPORT
To consider a report by the Corporate Director of Social Services (copy enclosed) which sets out the key issues arising from the Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales (CSSIW) evaluation of Denbighshire Social Services performance for 2013-14.
Minutes:
A copy of a report
by the Director Social Services (DSS), which set out the key issues arising
from the Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales (CSSIW) valuation of
Denbighshire Social Services performance for 2013-14, had been circulated
previously. A copy of the full
evaluation had been included as Appendix I.
The Chair welcomed
Mr Hugh Morgan, Area Manager for CSSIW (AMCSSIW), and the Principal Manager – Business Support to the meeting.
The report detailed
the performance evaluation for Social Services including areas of progress,
areas for improvement and risk. Every
year CSSIW undertake a comprehensive evaluation of each Local Authority’s
Social Services performance. The
evaluation draws on a wide range of evidence, including: the Director of Social
Services annual report on performance and plans for improvement in their local
authority area; CSSIW’s regulatory work; and the views of other auditors and
inspectors. The evaluation had been
moderated to ensure a consistent, transparent and proportionate approach.
The evaluation of
Denbighshire Social Services had highlighted that there was clarity and focus
in the report which outlined the direction of travel for social care in
Denbighshire and in particular:-
·
There
is powerful evidence of a strategic approach taken to meeting demographic
challenges.
·
The
Council has implemented innovative models of practice and integrated
partnership development.
·
There
is robust scrutiny particularly through service challenges and listening to
views of people underpinning the modernisation agenda.
·
A
strong commitment and forward planning in relation to Welsh language
·
Performance
of the service is strong.
A number of specific areas for improvement had been identified in the
report. The Council’s progress in
relation to these would be discussed during regular meetings between the Senior
Management Team and the CSSIW. The areas
for follow-up by the CSSIW next year included:-
·
The
impact of changes to the POVA (Protection of Vulnerable Adults) infrastructure.
·
The establishment
of a rigorous research approach to capturing and responding to the views of
children, young people and their families.
·
Improving
the quality of provision and outcomes for looked after children.
Appendix II provided an overview of the areas which were identified for
improvement in the performance evaluation, and information about how the
Council was responding to the areas identified for improvement.
Areas identified as requiring improvement were in line with the
Director’s self-assessment and had been embedded within Service Business Plans
for 2014-15. The plans were formally
monitored each quarter by the services, and many elements were reported
bi-annually to Performance Scrutiny and Cabinet as they formed part of the
Corporate Plan. Each service also had an
annual Service Performance Challenge which examined progress against Service
Business Plans.
Significant
progress had been made against the areas of improvement highlighted within the
2011-12 performance evaluation report.
It had been recognised that progress had not been as significant as
anticipated in respect of performance relating to looked after children. However, significant improvements had been
made since the inspection with 100% success in key areas.
The AMCSSIW
introduced and summarised the CSSIW Performance Evaluation Report and the
following salient points were highlighted:-
-
It had
been recognised that the Council had engaged in a strategic five year
modernisation plan, and the resulting considerable changes had been noted with
a reshaping of service provision.
-
There
was a good level of scrutiny through the Service Challenge process.
-
Areas
of strength were noted and three key areas requiring improvement had been
identified:-
(i)
How the
service listened and responded, reference to the collection of data.
(ii)
Concerns
pertaining to looked after children, particular reference to areas of health
and education.
(iii)
The
safeguarding of children and adults in particular. Reference made to the Protection of
Vulnerable Adults (POVA).
-
The
remit of the work of CSSIW with regard to POVA, and the respective policy
developments.
In response to
questions from the Chair, the DSS outlined developments and explained that the
Social Services and Well-being Wales Act had required a fundamental review of
the adult safeguarding processes in Wales, and the group charged with examining
the process would be reporting in the near future. Reference was made to case law which had
widened the scope of legislation and increased the volume of work for Councils
with a significant influx of cases. She
stressed that it was a fundamental aspect of social care to protect those who
were most vulnerable and to ensure that there was no deprivation of liberty
unless in their best interest. All homes
in Denbighshire had been made aware of the judgement and additional training had been provided
for staff as best interest assessors.
The Committee were
informed that the Adult Safeguarding Board would present an annual report to
Scrutiny, and monthly meetings held to discuss level 6 training. The HIA confirmed that Internal Audit would
be undertaking work on a wide ranging report on Corporate Safeguarding
procedure to be presented to the Committee.
The DSS responded
to a question from Councillor S.A. Davies and explained that WG funding had
been received, through the intermediate care fund grant, to assist with
addressing issues relating to delayed transfers of care for social care
reasons.
The Chair
highlighted the areas identified within the report as
requiring improvement, the need for progress and the importance of monitoring
the work undertaken. He made reference
to the significant decrease in the number of qualifications obtained by
looked after children, and to the importance of ensuring that research
undertaken was utilised to improve outcomes.
Difficulties in
attaining the views of young people were outlined by the DSS. She emphasised the importance of engaging
with them in a receptive manner and explained that a mechanisms had been
introduced to meet these requirements.
The DSS explained that performance was important but this would be
exceeded by the requirements of individual children and their respective
circumstances.
In response to a
question from the Chair seeking clarification of the statement that “the
pathway and outcomes for people who do not meet the threshold for care and
support from social services was unclear”, Mr Morgan (CSSIW) explained that
there had been an attempt to ascertain or capture evidence of how the specific
needs of the individuals were being addressed, and observe if adequate research
had been undertaken to address these issues and if the individuals had been
directed to other service providers for support and assistance. The DSS explained that there had been a new
configuration of service and outlined the monitoring procedures introduced.
The HLHRDS
responded to questions from the Chair on the level of work by Legal Services,
in respect of Care Orders, reflecting the implications of the work undertaken
by the Family Support Team. The DSS
explained that the process of taking a child into care could be perceived as a
failure of society and it would be important to assist in preventing such action. Mr P. Whitham
highlighted the reference made to the fluidity of looked after children but
expressed concern regarding the lack of the provision of numbers involved, the Principal Manager, Business Support confirmed that the figures were
available.
The Chair confirmed
that it would be important to monitor the work identified in Appendix 1, which
related to Children and Family Services, particularly areas of performance
around health and education of looked after children. The DSS explained that the actions identified
would be monitored within the Business Plan, the Service Challenge process and
in addition would also feature in the DSS Annual Report which would be
presented to the relevant Scrutiny Committee and Council.
At the request of
the Chair, the DSS agreed to circulate an e-mail to all Members detailing the
discussion at the meeting, and informing them that the Corporate Parenting
Panel were seeking nominations for additional Members.
Following further
discussion, it was:-
RESOLVED – that:-
(a)
that the CSSIW evaluation and the associated
progress report from Social Services be received and its contents noted.
(b)
the issues and concerns highlighted by
Members be noted, and
(c)
an e-mail be sent by the DSS to all Members
informing them that the Corporate Parenting Panel were seeking nominations for
additional Members.
(NS to Action)
Supporting documents: