Agenda item
DRAFT CARAVAN SITES STRATEGY FOR DENBIGHSHIRE
To consider a confidential report (copy attached) from the Development Manager (Planning and Public Protection) which seeks the Committee’s observations on options for more effective regulation of the County’s caravan sites.
10.50am – 11.30am
Minutes:
The Lead Member for Public Realm introduced a confidential report
by the Development Manager (Planning and
Public Protection) (previously circulated) which summarised the findings of the
Project Group established to try and develop a strategy to better manage
holiday caravan sites across the county.
Attached to the report was a draft options appraisal for the strategy,
titled 'Records, Regulation and Repercussions'.
This document outlined the Council's vision for holiday caravan sites in
the area, which was to ensure that they "are operating in accordance with
their relevant statutory consents...clear strategies are in place to address
the unauthorised residential occupation of holiday caravans including
regularisation of established sites and the effective enforcement of
others." There had been widespread
concern, both locally and nationally, for some considerable time on whether or
not all holiday caravan site operators were wholly complying with the planning
and licensing conditions pertaining to their sites. With a view to researching the extent of the
work required in this area the Project Group had been established to research
the extent of any planning or licensing non-compliance in this area. This Group had selected five holiday caravan
sites, of different sizes located in various parts of the county, and gathered
some preliminary information on their operations with a view to determining the
extent of any breach of holiday restrictions on those sites. Subsequently the addresses were
cross-referenced with information held on Council services' databases to
establish whether any applications for services or claims for benefits had been
generated from these sites, as this would potentially indicate whether
regulatory conditions on the sites were being contravened.
Officers
confirmed that the information collated from the exercise had in effect raised
more questions than had been answered. Council
departments held a wealth of information and records which could be used for
cross-referencing or evidence purposes e.g. planning and licensing records,
social services and education records, benefits, council tax and bus pass
application records. Using such
information officers had been able to issue a number of site owners with
Planning Contravention Orders (PCNs) informing them of a suspected use of their
site for permanent residential purposes.
As a result some of the owners had volunteered to work with the Council
to ensure that in future conditions were abided by, discussions were underway
with others with a view to ensuring compliance and avoiding enforcement action.
Nevertheless, one owner had been summoned to a magistrates
court early in 2015 on non-compliance grounds.
Based
on the success of the pilot project officers were keen to continue with the
work. Whilst there were benefits to the
Council and the local tourist industry through ensuring compliance with
regulatory conditions, there could also be repercussions for the Council if
enforcement action was taken against owners i.e. the need to house displaced
vulnerable residents if sites were forced to close etc. Nevertheless, members felt that the benefits
of enforcement and strict application of the regulations outweighed the risk
associated with complacency in this area, as illegal residency of holiday
caravan sites was a drain on local public services, be it local authority,
health services or other public services as the residents were not liable for
Council Tax as the caravans were not classed as their permanent residence.
Whilst
a member of the Welsh Assembly had tabled a Holiday Caravan Sites (Wales) Bill
in the Assembly, it seemed that there was a lack of willingness at this moment
in time to enact that Bill as a stand-alone piece of legislation. However, some
aspects of the Bill may be realised through amendments to existing legislation.
Responding
to members' questions the Development Manager (Planning and Public Protection):
·
outlined the complex nature of caravan site charging policies and
practices and of the legislative definition of 'caravan' and ‘holiday’ etc.
·
confirmed that he would inform members of the outcome of an
imminent meeting with the owner of one of the county's largest caravan sites
·
confirmed that the Planning and Public Protection Service was keen
to continue with the work undertaken to date by the pilot project and to extend
this further;
·
advised that self-regulation would play a key role in ensuring
compliance, however enforcement action may well be required in some cases and
this may prove difficult due to limited financial and human resources in the
light of budget constraints
·
stated that he was seeking a steer from members on the corporate
way forward with respect to securing better regulation of caravans sites in the
County and on the most effective way of moving the pilot project forward i.e.
through the establishment of a high level group to drive the project and
maintain momentum
·
confirmed that Conwy County Borough Council had identified a
similar non-compliance problem in its area, although it was not thought that
they had resolved the matter to date
Members
suggested that, in addition to the records referred to in the report, it may be
useful to utilise the following records for cross-referencing/data collection
purposes:
·
Disabled 'blue' badge application records
·
approach the Health Board with a view to sharing information on
the number of patients registered on their databases (centrally and with GP surgeries)
who had given their address as a caravan site in the county;
·
check again the 'Register of Electors' and any other Council
databases to ensure that none of the 'street/avenue names' used actually
referred to 'streets' on caravan sites as some of the larger sites were known
to have 'named streets' on site, this practice may disguise the true number of
unauthorised permanent residents; and
·
to possibly approach mobile phone companies and satellite
television providers to establish whether they are providing services to
residents at specific caravan sites
During
the discussion members:
·
emphasised the need to work with caravan site operators to ensure
compliance with planning and licensing conditions whilst recognising the
valuable assistance provided by them to the Authority in recent years to
rehouse displaced victims of large-scale flooding
·
emphasised the need for a clear message to be communicated to
holiday caravan site owners that in future the Council would not tolerate
non-compliance with planning or licensing instructions and that if owners were
not willing to work with the Council to manage their sites effectively that the
Authority would utilise enforcement action
·
supported the Lead Member's suggestion that a case be made for
additional officer support to be made available, under the 'spend to save'
initiative, to progress the project and enforce compliance in this area;
·
raised
concerns that the additional, supplementary
information sought from Social Services could not be made available in time to
inform the report at this stage of its development; and
·
to ask all Council departments to inform Planning and Public
Protection as a matter of course if they received a request for a service or
benefit from an individual who gave a caravan site as their address.
Following
detailed discussion on the report and the options appraisal the Committee:
Resolved:
i) subject to the above observations, and pursual of the suggested lines of inquiry, to endorse the
final production of the Strategy document;
ii) to request that the Head of Planning
and Public Protection, at the earliest possible opportunity, present a business
case to the Corporate Executive Team (CET) detailing proposals to effectively
engage an officer to progress the 'Better Regulation of Caravan Sites' project;
and
(iii) that a progress report on the Strategy's development, and
the above points be presented to the Committee at its March 2015 meeting
Prior to the meeting’s
conclusion the Chief Executive advised members’ that additional funding of
approximately £113m had been allocated to the WG in the UK Chancellor’s Autumn
Statement. The WG had already announced
that circa £70m of this money would be allocated to the Health Service, but no
decision had yet been made on the allocation of the remainder. The Leader would be writing to the Minister
for Public Services making a case for a substantial amount of the remaining
allocation to be awarded to local government, and specifically for local
government services in North Wales. The
Chief Executive requested members to similarly lobby their Welsh Assembly
representatives and party political representative to do the same with a view
to protecting services in the region.
Meeting concluded at
12pm.
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 8./1 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 8./2 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 8./3 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 8./4 is restricted