Agenda item
POST INSPECTION ACTION IN RESPONSE TO THE ESTYN INSPECTION ON THE QUALITY OF LOCAL AUTHORITY EDUCATION SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE IN DENGIGHSHIRE
To consider a report by the Partnerships and Communities Manager regarding progress made in addressing Estyn’s recommendations following the 2012 inspection.
9.35 a.m. – 10.10 a.m.
Minutes:
The Partnership and Communities Manager (PCM)
submitted a report (previously circulated) updating members on progress made in
addressing Estyn’s recommendations arising from the
2012 inspection since the last report submitted to the scrutiny committee in
January 2014.
Members were reminded of the positive outcome
of the inspection with only two recommendations for further improvement –
(1)
Improve the accuracy of Teacher Assessments
at the end of Key Stage 3
(2)
Identify all services for children and young
people in Denbighshire and establish an effective system to measure the impact
of these services to help the authority and its partners know whether these
offer good value for money
The Head of Education (HE) reported upon the
work carried out to address the first recommendation and members were pleased
to note that the validated Key Stage 3 results indicated that this
recommendation had been addressed. The
Core Subject Indicator had risen for a seventh consecutive year – rising from
75% in 2013 to 83.3% in 2014. It was
important for the Council to ensure that pupil outcomes at the end of primary
and secondary education were sustained and improved. In light of the improved outcomes the
Committee agreed that future monitoring of this recommendation could be
undertaken through annual scrutiny of external examination results and teacher
assessments which the Committee undertook in the autumn of every year. This year the report would be submitted to
the Committee’s October meeting and a representative from GwE
(Regional School Improvement Service) would also be attending to present an
annual report on progress. In responding
to issues raised by Co-opted Member Dawn Marjoram the HE confirmed that special
schools were supported in the same way in terms of scrutiny and systems in
place but data was not measured against mainstream schools. She accepted there were difficulties in terms
of comparative data and acknowledged that special schools were working hard to
track pupil progress.
The Committee accepted that the second recommendation
was much more difficult to define and quantify.
Officers advised that in an attempt to address this recommendation a
mapping exercise was underway to draw up a database of services to children and
young people in the county and identify any gaps in provision. Concerns were raised regarding the lack of
provision in the Dee Valley area for those with special needs and officers
agreed to consider the provision for special needs children and young people in
that area, including options for inclusion in existing child and youth
activities. Questionnaires would be
completed by the organisations in the presence of
Family Information Service officers who would emphasise
the need for honest answers about services currently provided to ensure that
any gaps identified could be considered for future provision. In responding to further questions officers
elaborated upon the monitoring process in place, involvement of other partner organisations within the process and timescales for the
collection and analysis of data. The
importance of promoting the availability of services was highlighted and it was
agreed to receive a further report once the mapping work had been completed.
RESOLVED that –
(a) the
information provided with regards to progress in addressing Estyn’s
recommendations be noted;
(b) as
a result of the maintained improvement in the accuracy of teacher assessments
at the end of Key Stage 3, further stand-alone reports on this matter were not
required. In future this aspect would be
monitored through the annual report submitted to the Committee on external
examination results and teacher assessments, and
(c) once
the mapping work had been completed, a further report be presented to the
Committee in early 2015 outlining the results of that work and proposals on how
the impact and value for money of the services to children and young people
across the county could be measured.
Supporting documents: