Agenda item
REVIEW OF SUSPENSION OF LICENCE - DRIVER NO. 043844
To consider a confidential report by the Head of Planning and Public Protection Services (copy enclosed) seeking members’ review of the suspension period previously imposed on Licensed Driver No. 043844.
Decision:
RESOLVED that the suspension imposed on Driver No.
043844 be lifted and a warning be issued as to his future conduct.
Minutes:
A confidential
report by the Head of Planning and Public Protection Services (previously
circulated) was submitted seeking members’ review of the period of suspension
previously imposed by the committee on Licensed Driver No. 043844. The facts of the case had been presented as
follows –
(i)
the
Licensing Committee held on 5 December 2012 had considered the suitability of
Driver No. 043844 to hold a licence to drive hackney
carriage and private hire vehicles following accrual of 12 penalty points on
his DVLA licence within a three year period [the
Driver had been permitted to retain his DVLA licence
by Prestatyn Magistrates who had accepted that a
disqualification would cause exceptional hardship in his case];
(ii)
details
of the endorsements on the Driver’s DVLA licence had
been considered, three of which related to the use of a mobile phone whilst
driving a vehicle, with members having raised grave concerns regarding the
serious implications of the Driver’s actions with potentially fatal
consequences and the repeated offence of using a mobile phone whilst driving
which they considered demonstrated the Driver’s disregard for the law and
public safety;
(iii)
during
deliberations the Licensing Committee considered the Driver would benefit from
attending a Driving Awareness Course in order to modify his behaviour
and that his suitability to continue as a licensed driver be further assessed
at their next meeting following his completion of the Driving Awareness Course;
consequently it was –
“RESOLVED that Driver No. 043844 be suspended
from driving hackney carriage and private hire vehicles on public safety
grounds and that he be required to undertake a Driving Awareness Course prior
to the matter being brought back before the committee’s next meeting (on 5
March 2013) in order to further assess his suitability to continue as a
licensed driver and reconsider the suspension imposed.”;
(iv)
the
Driver subsequently appealed against the Licensing Committee’s decision to the
Magistrates Court and on 19 December 2012 Magistrates dismissed the Appeal but
raised concerns regarding the length of the suspension imposed and directed the
matter be referred back to the Licensing Committee at the earliest opportunity
to allow the period of suspension to be reviewed;
(v)
the
Driver had attended a Driving Awareness Course on 19 January 2013 as directed
by the Licensing Committee (a copy of the Driver Assessment Report had been
circulated prior to the meeting), and
(vi)
Driver
No. 043844 had been invited to attend the meeting in support of his licence review and to answer members’ questions thereon.
The Licensing Officer (NJ) provided a summary of the report and advised
that the Driver was in attendance at the meeting.
Driver No. 043884 addressed the committee in support of his case advising
that he was an experienced driver of twenty five years and had never been in an
accident during that time. He elaborated
upon his driving history both in the UK and other countries and his experience
of driving a wide range of different vehicles.
The Driver assured the committee that whilst he had acted foolishly by
using a mobile phone whilst driving he did not routinely do so and explained
the circumstances surrounding each of the three offences. Members were also advised that the Driver had
suffered exceptional hardship as a result of the suspension with the loss of
earnings leaving him with financial difficulties. Details of his personal circumstances were
also disclosed in terms of his responsibilities and family commitments. The Driver then reported upon his attendance
at the Driving Awareness Course as stipulated by the committee highlighting the
improvements to his driving as a result.
In closing the Driver acknowledged his misconduct; reiterated the
hardship he had suffered as a result of the suspension, and asked members to
look favourably on the review of his licence.
Members took the opportunity to question the Driver regarding his
previous conduct and sought assurances regarding his future behaviour. The Driver advised that he had previously
used a mobile ear piece which had been stolen from his vehicle and a fixed
device had now been installed in the car.
He added that he did not routinely use a mobile phone in the vehicle in
any event as he used a handheld PDA device for work. In response to a question on the appropriate
use of speed referenced within the Driver Assessment report, the Driver assured
members that he did not speed but routinely drove at approximately 25 mph. His only conviction for speeding had been for
driving at 33 mph in a 30 mph area.
The Driver declined the opportunity to ask questions of members or
officers and indicated that he did not wish to add to his submission or make a
final statement.
The committee adjourned to consider the case and after deliberation it
was –
RESOLVED that the suspension imposed on Driver No.
043844 be lifted and a warning be issued as to his future conduct.
The reasons for the Licensing Committee’s decision were as follows –
In reaching a decision members had taken into account the concerns of the
Magistrates regarding the length of the suspension originally imposed; the
mitigating circumstances surrounding each of the three offences explained by
the Driver; his attendance at a Driving Awareness Course and the driver
assessment report produced together with his assurances regarding future
conduct. The committee had been
reassured by the Driver’s attendance at the Driving Awareness Course; his
acknowledgment of wrongdoing and regret over the offences, and his undertakings
to modify his behavior in future to ensure no repeat of the offence. Nevertheless, members reiterated the serious
nature of the offences and the potentially fatal consequences of the Driver’s
actions in his persistent use of a mobile phone whilst driving and therefore a
stern warning was issued as to his future conduct.
The Chair conveyed the Licensing Committee’s decision and reasons for the
decision to Driver No. 043844 and impressed upon him the seriousness of the
offences which the committee had not considered lightly and warned him about
his future conduct. It was made clear
that if the Driver was brought before the committee again regarding this matter
his licence would likely be revoked.
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 4./1 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 4./2 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 4./3 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 4./4 is restricted