Agenda item
REVIEW OF A LICENCE TO DRIVE HACKNEY CARRIAGE AND PRIVATE HIRE VEHICLES - DRIVER NO. 517116
To consider a confidential report by the Head of Planning, Public Protection and Countryside Services (copy enclosed) seeking members’ review of a licence to drive hackney carriage and private hire vehicles in respect of Driver No. 517116.
Decision:
RESOLVED that Driver No.
517116 was a fit and proper person to hold a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire
Vehicle Driver’s Licence and that a formal written
warning be issued in respect of the persistent speeding convictions obtained
and failure to disclose them as required.
A condition was also imposed on the Hackney Carriage and Private Hire
Vehicle Driver’s Licence requiring the Driver to
complete a speed awareness course to include a practical assessment in addition
to any theory training provided within 3 months of the date of the decision
notice. Failure to comply with this
condition could result in suspension of the licence.
Minutes:
A confidential report by the
Head of Planning, Public Protection and Countryside Services (previously
circulated) was submitted upon –
(i)
the suitability of Driver No 517116 to hold a licence to drive hackney carriage
and private hire vehicles following speeding convictions obtained in February
2024 which had not previously been declared, and June 2021 which had not
previously been declared prior to submission of his renewal application;
(ii)
background information and associated documentation having been provided
including details of the motoring convictions, record of interview with the
Driver, together with his previous driving history and appearances before the
Committee in relation to his original application in 2017;
(iii)
officers having referred the matter to the
Licensing Committee for determination given the particular circumstances of the
case;
(iv)
the Council’s policy with regard to the relevance
of convictions and suitability of applicants and licensees, and
(v)
the Driver having been invited to attend the meeting in support of the
licence review and to answer members’ questions thereon.
The Driver was in
attendance in support of his licence review.
The Licensing Enforcement
Officer (NS) submitted the report and facts of the case.
The Driver submitted that he had changed considerably since the original
motoring convictions obtained in his youth from 1998 and did not accept there
was a miscommunication with the Magistrates’ Court in 2017 as detailed in the
report. He explained he had not declared
penalty points in 2021 due to a change in occupation but had declared those
penalty points at a later stage. The
circumstances surrounding the February 2024 conviction were also
explained. Finally, the Driver provided
assurances regarding his conduct as a licensed driver, tabled a number of
references attesting to his good character, and apologised
for not declaring the penalty points as required. In response to questions the Driver
elaborated on the circumstances of the speeding conviction and 3 penalty points
and the management responsibilities in his current employment.
The Committee adjourned to consider the case and it was –
RESOLVED that Driver No.
517116 was a fit and proper person to hold a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire
Vehicle Driver’s Licence and that a formal written
warning be issued in respect of the persistent speeding convictions obtained
and failure to disclose them as required.
A condition was also imposed on the Hackney Carriage and Private Hire
Vehicle Driver’s Licence requiring the Driver to
complete a speed awareness course to include a practical assessment in addition
to any theory training provided within 3 months of the date of the decision
notice. Failure to comply with this
condition could result in suspension of the licence.
The
reasons for the Licensing Committee’s decision were as follows –
Members had carefully considered
the evidence before them in reaching their decision. The Committee’s decision was finely balanced
but considered that the Driver did remain a fit and proper person to continue
to hold a dual driver’s licence.
The Committee found the
failure to disclose the pending conviction in the renewal application in
December 2023 to be dishonest with the Driver having known about a pending
conviction given he had immediately accepted the offer of a fine and penalty
points. The Committee also found the failure
to disclose the penalty points within 7 days as required once it had been
received to be deliberate and dishonest.
Although the Committee
found the Driver had acted dishonestly as described above, the Committee
considered that there were mitigating circumstances which went some way towards
explaining why the conviction had not been disclosed within the appropriate
time period as required. The Committee
was concerned by the Driver’s persistent speeding but were reassured that those
convictions did not occur whilst driving a taxi with customers. Notwithstanding, the Committee expected the
Driver to always remain professional with regards to the driving
standards. Consequently, the Committee
considered that it was appropriate to issue a written warning in respect of the
persistent speeding and failure to notify the licensing authority of relevant
matters at the appropriate times. The
Committee placed weight on the references provided and considered that overall,
the Driver remained a fit and proper person to hold a Hackney Carriage and
Private Hire Vehicle Driver’s Licence. The written
warning would remain on file with the Licensing Authority for consideration at
the appropriate times.
The Committee’s decision and reasons therefore were conveyed to the
Driver.
The
meeting concluded at 11.40 am.
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 10./1 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 10./2 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 10./3 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 10./4 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 10./5 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 10./6 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 10./7 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 10./8 is restricted