Agenda item
LICENSING ACT 2003: APPLICATION FOR A NEW PREMISES LICENCE - DEUTCH'S BAR, 39 WELLINGTON ROAD, RHYL
To consider an application for a new Premises Licence submitted in accordance with Section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003 in respect of Deutch’s Bar, 39 Wellington Road, Rhyl (an outline of the submission and associated papers are attached).
Please note the procedure to be taken by the Sub Committee (which is attached to this agenda).
Decision:
RESOLVED
that a Premises Licence be granted for the amended hours as set out in the
Senior Licensing Officer’s report and subject to the conditions set out in the
Operating Schedule.
Minutes:
The Senior Licensing Officer submitted a report by the
Head of Planning, Public Protection and Countryside Services (previously
circulated) upon –
(i)
an
application having been received from Mr. Gary Longworth for a new Premises
Licence in respect of Deutch’s Bar, 39 Wellington Road, Rhyl proposing the
provision of live music (Indoors only) together with the provision of recorded
music (Indoors only), provision of anything similar to live music, recorded
music or performances of dance (Indoors only), and the sale of alcohol for
consumption both on and off the premises (Appendix A to the report);
(ii)
the
application having originally been submitted on 19 September 2023 but due to an
oversight on the Applicant’s part the requisite public notice was not placed in
a local publication within the statutory timeframe and the application having
been resubmitted on 12 October 2023;
(iii)
the
applicant having requested authorisation for provision of the following –
LICENSABLE
ACTIVITY |
DAYS
APPLICABLE |
TIME
FROM |
TIME
TO |
Supply of alcohol (for consumption off the premises)* Supply of alcohol (for consumption on the premises)* |
Monday – Friday Saturday – Sunday and bank holidays Monday – Sunday |
14:00 18:00 |
23:40 23:40 |
Provision of Live Music (Indoors) |
Monday – Sunday |
10:00 |
00:00 |
Provision of Recorded Music (Indoors) |
Monday – Sunday |
10:00 |
00:00 |
Provision of anything similar to Live Music, Recorded Music or
Performances of Dance (Indoors) |
Monday – Sunday |
10:00 |
00:00 |
Hours Premises are open to the Public |
Monday – Sunday |
10:00 |
00:00 |
*Amended hours offered as part of mediation [original
proposed hours for alcohol sales were from 10:00 hrs daily; the Applicant
having reconsidered the alcohol hours in light of the representations
received.]
(iv)
thirteen
written representations having originally been received from Other Persons in
response to the requisite public notice but one representation having since
been withdrawn following mediation.
Remaining representations related mainly to possible disturbance from
noise and anti-social behaviour (Appendix B to the report);
(v)
the
Applicant having engaged with the North Wales Police and the Council’s
Environmental Health Section and agreed to include a number of conditions as
part of the resubmitted application (Appendix C to the report) which would form
part of the Operating Schedule should the application be granted;
(vi)
the
North Wales Police having also submitted a representation in support of the
application (Appendix D to the report);
(vii)
mediation
having been offered to all parties considering the representations received
with no formal agreement having been reached.
As part of mediation the Applicant had offered to amend the application
relating to alcohol hours and submitted a response to all Other Persons who
submitted representations with a hope to address some of the concerns raised
(Appendix E to the report);
(viii)
the
need to consider the application taking due account of Guidance and the
Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy; other relevant legislation and
relevant representations received, and
(ix)
the
options available to the Sub Committee when determining the application.
The Senior Licensing Officer summarised the report and
facts of the case.
APPLICANT’S
SUBMISSION
The Applicant, Mr. Gary Longworth was in
attendance in support of the application.
Mr. Longworth explained the reasoning
behind his application and intention to operate a gallery and music bar, to
provide a venue to display his father’s paintings, and to showcase local talent
for free, through art and music. Having recently moved back to the area he
referred to his search for a suitable venue for this purpose, providing
sufficient wall space to showcase his father’s paintings and those of other
aspiring artists, and to provide the opportunity to showcase local talent
through poetry and music, with the stage open to anyone for free. The operation of a bar was required to
support the creative art side of the business, to make the venue viable, with
the intention to create a safe and responsible place to drink.
Most objections to the application related
to the potential impact on the Salvation Army and associated services operated
from the Community Centre in Windsor Street, Rhyl which was situated directly
behind the premises. Mr. Longworth
commended the work of the Salvation Army and stated that he would not have
proceeded with his plans for the venue if he thought it would cause a
detrimental impact on that work. He
referred to attempts to engage with the Salvation Army regarding his plans,
advising that he had not proceeded with his original intention for a sealed
smoking shelter because the Salvation Army had objected to it. He had tried to engage and mediate with the
Salvation Army on a number of occasions with a view to addressing areas of
concern to no avail; he had since written to the Salvation Army regarding his
intentions for the venue and steps taken to address areas of concern. Further details of Mr. Longworth’s response
to address concerns had been detailed in Appendix E to the report.
Mr. Longworth reported that he had
originally proposed opening hours of 10am to accommodate occasional events but
had anticipated usual opening hours from 12 noon. However, given the objections he had amended
the opening hours to 2pm with no off sales of alcohol until 6pm. He could not agree to operate an alcohol-free
bar or to open from 6pm because the venue would not be viable. Mr. Longworth also disagreed with the
reasoning that his venue would detrimentally impact vulnerable individuals/service
users due to its proximity to the Salvation Army, particularly given the number
of bars and off-licences in the vicinity and their extended opening hours. Due to the lack of engagement, he had
recently discovered that alcohol services only operated on two days; had he
known that earlier he would have amended his opening hours only for those
specific days. In closing, Mr. Longworth
reiterated his support for the Salvation Army and hope for a good working
relationship going forward.
NORTH WALES POLICE SUBMISSION
PC Simon Keeting from the North Wales
Police had submitted written representations in support of the application
(Appendix D to the report).
PC Keeting concurred with Mr. Longworth’s
submission and had been saddened that he had amended his proposed opening hours
to appease objectors when there were many licensed premises in the area with
longer opening hours, including newsagents with an off-licence open from 6am,
where most of those with alcohol additions would purchase alcohol. He felt it was to the Applicant’s credit that
he had taken such action to address the concerns raised.
PC Keeting and his Inspector had met with Mr.
Longworth to discuss his intentions for the venue, and he had no issue with
it. They had also discussed ideas to
work with community groups and bring them into the venue. PC Keeting explained
his role as Partnership Officer and his work with the Salvation Army; as a dry
organisation the Salvation Army considered it was right to submit
representations, and he was hopeful that if the licence was granted, they would
work with the Applicant. PC Keeting felt
the Applicant was genuine in his intentions and engaged well with the Police
and that the venue would be safe and responsibly managed.
Members put questions to Mr. Longworth,
including matters of concern raised within the representations received from
other persons, who responded as follows –
· whilst he had worked in a bar in his youth,
he had little experience of operating a bar and had been taking advice in that
regard to ensure its success; his initial intention was to employ one or two
members of staff
· confirmed his intention for open mic/local
talent both from newcomers and established bands; he was a keen musician
himself and would play the guitar
· steps had already been taken to address
noise concerns with wall acoustic insulated plasterboard and future works to
include acoustic ceiling insulation and speaker positioning; he would be
personally responsible for monitoring noise and provided assurances that an
appropriate limit would be set
· the capacity of the premises would be
between 60 – 100 persons
· illustrated on the plan (previously
circulated) the car park area at the rear of the premises advising that he
owned an area of approximately 3/4 metres squared which he intended to use to
park his vehicle and potentially house a locked bin secured to the wall; there
was a fire exit at the rear of the premises which would not be used by
customers as a means of access/egress to the premises
· all licensable activity was to be contained
within the premises and further assurances were given that there was no
proposed use for the rear of the premises, i.e., no beer garden/sitting areas,
no smoking area, no entry/exit, no music, signage or bright lights to tempt
anyone into the premises
· the premises had been purchased as an empty
shop with a significant amount of money having already been spent on its
renovation which had since been stopped pending the outcome of the licence
application.
PUBLIC
REPRESENTATIONS FROM OTHER PERSONS
Twelve written representations had been
received (Appendix B to the report) from Other Persons relating mainly to noise
nuisance and anti-social behaviour. In
the absence of the twelve Other Persons their representations were taken as
read.
APPLICANT’S
FINAL STATEMENT
In making his final statement, the
Applicant reiterated that he supported the work of the Salvation Army and would
not do anything to undermine or jeopardise it.
If members were minded to grant the application, he would continue to
try and work with the Salvation Army going forward. In his written representations he had
attempted to allay the concerns raised, confirming there was no intention for a
beer garden or use of the rear of the premises by customers. The reference to beer cans and needles in the
car park area could not be attributed to his premises which was not even open or
operating and beyond his control. Finally,
he reiterated the intention for a venue to display his father’s paintings and
showcase local talent in the area for the benefit of Rhyl.
ADJOURNMENT
TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION
At this juncture (10.40 a.m.) the Licensing
Sub Committee adjourned to consider the application.
DECISION
RESOLVED
that a Premises Licence be granted for the amended hours as set out in the Senior
Licensing Officer’s report and subject to the conditions set out in the
Operating Schedule.
The Chair conveyed the Sub Committee’s decision to all
parties present and the Legal Adviser reported on the reasons for the decision
as follows –
Members had
carefully considered the application and representations submitted in this case
and were satisfied that the conditions set out in the Operating Schedule and
those agreed with North Wales Police and the Council’s Environmental Health
Section were proportionate and would promote the licensing objectives. In terms of the written representations the
objectors had not attended the meeting and so the Sub Committee could only take
their written representations at face value.
Members had been reassured by the Applicant’s explanation of steps taken
to address the concerns raised in the representations and how he proposed to
manage the premises. The Sub Committee
was also reassured by the fact that PC Simon Keeting had supported the
application. The Sub Committee was satisfied that the conditions as detailed
within the application and to be attached to the licence would suffice in
promotion of the licensing objectives.
The amended hours were granted following the Applicant’s proposal in
response to concerns expressed by the representations.
All parties had a
right to appeal against the Licensing Sub Committee’s decision to the
Magistrates’ court within twenty-one days.
The meeting concluded at
11.25 am.
Supporting documents: