Agenda item
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW 2011/2012
To consider a report by the Corporate Improvement Team Manager (copy enclosed) which sought approval of the Council’s draft Annual Performance Report for 2011-12.
Minutes:
A
copy of a report by
the Corporate Improvement Team Manager, which sought approval of the Council’s draft Annual Performance Report for 2011-12, had been circulated with the
papers for the meeting.
The Council was required to publish an annual report of its performance by the 31st October each year and a decision was required to approve the draft Annual Performance Review 2011-12, which had been included as Appendix I to the report.
The Lead Member for Modernisation and Performance, Councillor B.A. Smith, introduced the report and explained that the Corporate Plan 2009-12 set the strategic direction for the Authority and the publication of the annual Corporate Plan Delivery Document for 2011-12 outlined how it intended to contribute to the delivery of its Corporate Plan during that financial year. Each Council service produced a service plan for 2011-12 to describe how it intended to contribute to the delivery of agree outcomes for the communities of Denbighshire. The Annual Performance report provided a retrospective evaluation of the Council’s success in delivering against the plans during 2011-12, and provided an indication as to whether the Council had successfully fulfilled its obligation to make arrangements to secure continuous improvement.
The Annual Performance Review included a specific evaluation of the Council’s success in delivering its corporate priorities. It evaluated its performance in relation to the key indicators and performance measures, and indicated how the corporate priorities had impacted locally within the six areas of Denbighshire. The Council had delivered its pledge to become a High Performing Council, Close to its Communities and Councillor Smith explained that the aim of providing an honest and balanced view of the Council’s performance had been achieved. A number of challenges remained and these had formed the basis for the development of the new Corporate Plan.
Details of the consultations undertaken had been included in the report. However, it was confirmed that an Equality Impact Assessment had not been undertaken in respect of this report.
The following responses were provided to questions and
issues raised by Members:-
·
Page 22 -
officers agreed to ensure the language sign post in the Annual Report was
amended and Welsh version positioned ahead of English in accordance with the
Council’s policy.
·
Page 24,
Road and Flood Defences – officers agreed to seek clarification and provide
details in relation to Welsh Government funding for the flood relief schemes in
Rhyl and Corwen.
·
Page 25,
Priority Area, Highways – The Chief Executive informed Members that a
recommendation would be submitted to the Partnerships Scrutiny Committee and
Cabinet not to proceed with the merger of the Denbighshire and Conwy Highways
Departments. He confirmed that this
would not affect the investment made by Denbighshire and assured Members that
the project in question would be secure.
The Chief Executive responded to concerns expressed by Members and
explained that the situation should not be presented as a failure of
collaboration but viewed as Denbighshire having been proactive in assessing and
responding to the options available.
·
Page 63,
Denbigh Area – it was agreed that officers seek clarification and provide
details in relation to Tai Clwyd funding for the development relating to the
relocation of Youth Services. Councillor
C.L. Hughes confirmed that funding had not yet been secured.
·
Page 25,
Priority Area, Highways – The Chief Executive explained
that the Government stance in respect of the introduction of Collaboration had
not changed, and if not progressed voluntarily other alternatives could be
imposed. The purpose of collaboration
had been to deliver major savings.
However, there would be initial financial implications involved in
merging which, in the case of Highways, had been considered unsustainable. There would also be a need for political and
executive will, which would be imperative from all parties involved, if success
was to be realised.
·
Councillor
J. Butterfield referred to Performance Indicators which reveal that priorities
had not been met and pupils had left school without the appropriate
qualifications. Councillor E.W. Williams
supported the views expressed by Councillor J. Butterfield regarding the need
to fast track improvements at
·
Page 30,
High Performing Council, Close to its Communities – The Corporate Improvement Manager endorsed the view expressed by Councillor J. Butterfield of the importance of improving
working relationships between elected Members and officers of the Council and
the Community.
·
Page 15,
Regeneration – The Corporate Improvement Manager explained that Performance
Measures in respect of HMO taken through licensing had been included as green
as the target set had been surpassed.
However, he explained that under the new Corporate Plan all the
indicators and measures would be reviewed in an attempt to achieve the
threshold for excellence.
·
Page 19,
Demographic Change - It was explained that Performance Indicator relating to
People Supported Below 60% Poverty Lines, indicated as red, was misleading as
it only measured the activity of the Welfare Rights Unit and did not include
the partnership work being undertaken.
The Head
of Business, Planning and Performance referred to work being undertaken in Communities First areas
which had been designated as a priority, together with, the European Social
Fund Project being promoted by the Local Service Board.
·
Performance
Measures, People supported below 60%
Welfare Rights Team works well with the Citizen’s Advice Bureau, Rhyl Benefits Advice Shop should provide more
assistance recognise and address
changes to benefits.
·
Page 66, Ruthin, Cae Ddol
Project – the Corporate Improvement Manager agreed to
review the situation pertaining to Cae Ddol to ensure accuracy.
·
Page 35,
Demographic Change – In response to a question from Councillor Feeley regarding the discrepancy between the data and the
target for the NWC: Number of People Supported out of NEET and report back to
Councillor Feeley.
The Corporate Director; Modernisation and Well-being outlined the problems experienced in securing
European funding, particularly in terms of the economic situation, and made
reference to the specific targets outlined in the report.
·
Page 61, Oaktree Centre, Rhyl - the Corporate Improvement Manager agreed to review the situation
pertaining to the Oaktree Centre, Rhyl and ensure
the inclusion of the latest information in report.
·
In response to points raised by
Councillor C. Guy-Davies regarding the amount of
detailed information contained in the Annual Performance Report, the Head of Business, Planning and
Performance explained that Denbighshire were required by the Wales Audit Office
to publish information and there were difficulties in maintaining a
balance. However, consideration could be
afforded to providing a summary to accompany future Annual
Performance Report.
The Chair thanked the officers for the hard work undertaken in
producing a comprehensive report.
RESOLVED – that, subject to above changes, Council approves the draft Annual
Performance Report 2011-12 to enable translation and publication before 31st
October, 2012.
Supporting documents: