Agenda item
APPLICATION NO. 20/2019/0884 - LAND ADJACENT TO BWLCH Y LLYN, PENTRE COCH, RUTHIN
To consider an application for the development of 0.125ha of land by the erection of a detached local needs affordable dwelling and associated works (outline application - all matters reserved) (copy attached)
Minutes:
An application was submitted for the development of 0.125ha
of land by the erection of a detached local needs affordable dwelling and
associated works (outline application - all matters reserved) at Land opposite Land adjacent to Bwlch y Llyn,
Pentre Coch, Ruthin
Public Speaker –
Denise Baker (For) - informed
the committee that the family had been farming in the location for five
generations, and were a Welsh speaking family which have always supported the
local community, and continue to do so. The application was for a self-build
affordable need house, which was for a young member of the family who wished to
remain in the area and close to the family. The proposal was for a modest home
in harmony with the area’s character, and use of local construction material.
Given the exceptional nature of such a development it was acknowledged a design
sensitive to the area would be required. The proposed site of the development
was on land owned by the family and the concerns of consultees over the
development occurring in open countryside was understood. However the previous
house on the site could be taken into consideration. The previous dwelling was
called Waen Grogen, the
proposed site was a brown field site, which had no agricultural benefit. The
house could not be seen from any other houses, and additional screening could
be carried to lessen the visibility further. The applicants’ intention was to
allow future generations of the family to live in the property for the future.
However legal agreements could be put in place to ensure someone with close
ties to the area would live in the dwelling, as long as affordable needs
existed in the area.
General Debate:
Councillor Hugh Evans (Local Member) referred to six other applications
which were very similar to this, and they had been granted. The application
would allow a local Denbighshire resident to stay within the County, which was
a part of the corporate plan, the Welsh language would also be preserved in the
area. The average cost of houses in the area was in excess of £300,000 and
having affordable housing would allow a young member of society to stay in the
area. It was also highlighted that there was a shortage of affordable housing
in the rural areas. The proposal would also bring an abandoned house back into
use. The application did not pass some of the planning policies but did meet
the corporate priorities. If the application was accepted it would not set a
precedent across the county.
Officers responded to the local member’s questions in
regards to policy BSC8 and BSC9 and the tests for these policies. In regards to
BSC8 the applicant had not provided evidence to demonstrate that allocated
housing sites were not likely to come forward within 5 years the site clearly
did not adjoin the development boundary of the village, which was 1.2km to the
west of the proposal. In regards to policy BSC9 the property would be developed
well away from the farm and would be in the open countryside. It was also noted
that the applicant was not in affordable housing need, based on standard tests
including income and savings, as assessed by Grwp Cynefin.
Proposal Councillor
Tony Thomas, proposed the development be granted contrary to officer
recommendation as the development met the Council’s corporate plan, seconded by
Councillor Emrys Wynne.
Members highlighted that the property would be developed on
land which had no agricultural benefit and it was queried whether there was a
previous property at the site and whether that it would have an impact on the
application in planning terms. It was also queried why the financial background
of the applicant was required for the application, as other applicants in
Denbighshire seeking affordable housing were not asked about their financial
situation. It was also suggested that conditions be included on the application
that the old stone of the derelict building be used on the new house.
Responding, officers clarified that there were no specific
planning policy provisions for rebuilding derelict buildings. In regards to the
affordable housing query, it was necessary to test qualification for local
needs affordable housing as the application was submitted on this basis.
Conditions could be attached to any permission to control use of external
materials.
Councillor Hugh Evans (Local Member) thanked the committee
for the debate on the matter, and accepted the application might not meet all
planning policies. However the application did meet the Council’s corporate
policies of allowing a young resident to stay within the community. It was also
outlined that he did not believe granting this application would set a
dangerous precedent with similar applications, and reassured members that the
applicants would conform to any conditions which could be agreed upon.
VOTE:
GRANT – 8
REFUSE – 5
ABSTAIN – 1
RESOLVED that permission be GRANTED, contrary
to officer recommendation, on the grounds that the development would conform to
the Corporate Plan for the Young People.
Supporting documents: