Agenda item
TOURISM SIGNAGE STRATEGY FOR DENBIGHSHIRE
To consider a report by the Traffic, Parking and Road Safety Manager and the Team Leader - Tourism,
Marketing and Events, updating members on the initial development of a tourism signage
strategy for Denbighshire.
11.15-12.00 p.m.
Minutes:
In the absence of the Leader the Deputy Leader (Lead Member
for Finance, Performance and Strategic Assets) introduced a joint report by the
Council’s Traffic, Parking and Road Safety Manager and the Team Leader:
Tourism, Marketing and Events (previously circulated) which updated members on
the initial development of a tourism signage strategy for Denbighshire.
He briefed members on the background to the project and explained that once the
‘brown’ tourist signs were erected on the side of the A55 to direct visitors to
Rhuddlan, St. Asaph and Denbigh, there would need to
be other signs to signpost them to other attractions across the county.
Lead Members and officers were of the view that erection of the A55 signs and
the introduction of the Welsh Government’s (WG) tourism initiative ‘The Wales
Way’ (attached at appendix C to the report) which focussed on promoting three
core tourism routes in the country, provided an ideal opportunity for the
Council itself to develop a tourism signage strategy for Denbighshire which
complemented both the A55 signs and the WG’s vision, whilst developing the
county’s urban and rural economies. In addition to working with town and
community councils, tourism and other businesses to develop and provide ‘traditional’
signage it would also be advisable to maximise digital information portals and
business opportunities, such as ‘i-beacons’.
Officers advised that North Wales
local authorities had recently submitted a successful joint bid under ‘The
Wales Way’ project to develop winter tourism in the region. Work was currently underway with local businesses
across the region with a view to engaging them with a project that would see
tourist related businesses open all year round and thriving, whatever the
season. Whilst technology was developing on a daily basis, roadside signs
were still an important way of drawing attractions to the attention of
tourists, digital information was supplemental to signs.
Responding to
members questions the Lead Member and officers advised that:
·
tourist
operator usually paid for ‘brown’ signs, but that the Council usually paid any
maintenance costs relating to them despite not having a specific budget for
maintenance costs of the signs;
·
the proposed elected member and officer working
group could work out the details of preferred and alternative tourist routes
throughout the county, as part of its work in developing ‘tourist
trails’. The Group could also discuss with city, town and community councils
the benefits of developing and purchasing signs which had a consistent
branding. This working group would solely look at a signage strategy,
including the inclusion of easily identifiable symbols etc., for the county’s
highways network, it would not examine trunk road signage as they were the
responsibility of WG. Once established it was envisaged that there would
be an opportunity for the Working Group to work with other neighbouring
authorities with a view to ensuring that each authority’s ‘tourism trails’
would complement each other’s trails and those identified as part of the
pan-North Wales Way bid;
·
whilst
the Council no longer had its own ‘Sign Shop’ it could still procure road signs
at a competitive rate, albeit that there would be some time delay for delivery;
·
the Working Group charged with progressing the A55
tourist signs for the Vale of Clwyd attractions had re-convened following the
Committee’s November meeting with a view to progressing the project.
There was a slight shortfall in the funding available for the signs which the
Assembly Member (AM) was attempting to solve via WG;
·
whilst
tourist were increasingly relying on digital information about where to visit
etc. there would still be a need for paper documentation such as maps and
guides; and
·
political balance was not a requirement for a
working group, although given the remit of the proposed group it would be
beneficial if it was made up of members from across the county.
The Committee agreed that it was extremely important for
tourists to be directed to all areas of the county to ensure that county’s
entire economy had an opportunity to benefit from their spending power.
Members were of the view that a representative from WG should be invited
to join the Denbighshire Tourism Signage Strategy Working Group to ensure that
the Group’s proposals supplemented the WG’s own strategy.
Responding to members concerns about small local businesses
and local authorities’ ability to purchase ‘digital’ advertising space on line
and on social media to promote their businesses in comparison to large national
and multi-national companies officers advised that businesses could list
themselves on Google and Google Maps free of charge. It would be a matter
of educating businesses on how to list their business and what they had to
offer. Another effective and low cost method of promoting a business etc.
would be via a ‘blog’, as ‘bloggers’ attracted a wide international
audience. Technology was evolving on a daily basis and provided excellent
opportunities to draw services and businesses to the attention of tourists
Officers agreed to enquire whether the Local Government Act
prescribed who should fund or contribute towards the cost of road signs.
Following a detailed discussion the Committee:
Resolved: - subject
to the above observations
(i)
to support the continuation of the
work to develop a tourism signage strategy for Denbighshire;
(ii)
to confirm that, as part of its
consideration it had read, understood and taken account of the Well-being
Impact Assessment in Appendix A;
(iii)
to recommend that the proposed
officer and elected member working group to be established to develop a tourism
signage strategy for Denbighshire comprise of 12 elected members, two
representing each Member Area Group (MAG), and a representative from Welsh
Government (WG), along with relevant officers; and
(iv)
that a report on the Working
Group’s progress in developing a tourism signage strategy, including
information on potential funding sources and anticipated timescale for the
project’s delivery, be presented to the Committee in 12 months’ time
Supporting documents:
- Tourism Signage Strategy Report 170518, item 7. PDF 155 KB
- Tourism Signage report 170517 - Appendix A, item 7. PDF 78 KB
- Tourism Signage Strategy Report - Appendix B 170518, item 7. PDF 127 KB
- Tourism Signage report 170517 - Appendix C (E), item 7. PDF 582 KB