Agenda item
POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER
- Meeting of Communities Scrutiny Committee, Thursday, 2 February 2017 9.30 am (Item 5.)
- View the declarations of interest for item 5.
To discuss with the Police and Crime Commissioner his vision and priorities for the region.
9.35 a.m. – 10.15 a.m.
Minutes:
The Chair welcomed Mr. Arfon
Jones, North Wales Police and Crime Commissioner who was attending the meeting
at the Committee’s invitation to discuss his vision and priorities for the
region. Members noted the distinction between
the Commissioner’s strategic role and the Chief Constable’s operational role in
policing and it was agreed to invite the Chief Constable to a future meeting to
discuss his vision and priorities.
Prior to his formal address the Commissioner
advised that the Police and Crime Panel had earlier that week approved his
draft budget for 2017/18, which would result in 17 additional police officers
and 6 other members of staff being recruited.
Of the 17 additional police officers to be recruited, 10 would be
deployed ‘on the beat’ across North Wales to deal with low level crime, such as
anti-social behaviour, whilst the remaining 7 officers and 6 other members of
staff would be employed in specialist roles, mainly investigating child
exploitation and cyber-crime. To fund
this budget the Panel had agreed to set the Police precept at 3.79%, which
equated to an increase of £9 a year, or 17p a day, on a Band D property across
North Wales.
Mr. Jones addressed the Committee outlining his
role and responsibilities as the elected Commissioner, the public’s
representative for liaising with North Wales Police. These duties included –
·
setting
the budget and precept for the Police Service
·
holding
the Chief Constable to account for fulfilling his main duty, of providing an
effective and efficient police service for North Wales, providing value for
money and reducing crime
·
allocating
revenue to prevent crime and disorder to groups across North Wales
·
drawing up a Police
and Crime Plan, setting out the strategic direction for policing in North
Wales.
The Commissioner was currently in the process
of consulting on his Police and Crime Plan, his first plan since his election
in May 2016. As part of his consultation
on the Plan an online questionnaire had been available for residents to
complete and a series of public meetings had been held across North Wales. He informed members that following his
election he had not changed his predecessor’s Plan as he agreed with the
majority of the actions in it. However,
his Plan would reflect the changes and threats facing North Wales as well as,
where possible, residents, statutory agencies, voluntary sector and the
business community’s priorities across the region.
The Commissioner’s Plan would focus on the
vulnerability of people rather than seek to deal with everyone and
everything. Consequently it would
include plans to address domestic abuse, child abuse, modern slavery and human
trafficking. Whilst the basic principles
of policing had stayed the same as when he was a serving police officer, other
aspects of policing had changed as had the types of crime they were dealing
with on a day to day basis. Abhorrent
crimes such as child sexual exploitation, human trafficking and modern slavery
were far more prevalent now as were cyber-crime incidents. Statistics now indicated that these days more
crimes were committed online than on the streets. As a result more of the Police’s resources
were required to deal with crime that was to an extent ‘hidden’, or not visible
to the majority of the population. Whilst
this ‘hidden’ crime could initially seem easy to investigate, the speed and
power of cyber and social media crime meant it was a complex area which could
extend around the globe and involve dozens, if not hundreds of perpetrators,
i.e. the sharing of indecent images, etc.
To emphasise the extent and complexities of these types of cases he
referred to specific high profile cases which had featured in the media in
recent months. Quite often victims of
such offences, due to their vulnerability, did not recognise themselves as
victims, therefore time and commitment of specialist staff from the Police and
other agencies were required in order to compile the evidence of the crimes
committed.
Modern day slavery was another ‘new’ crime that
was becoming more prevalent in North Wales.
The port of Holyhead made North Wales a key area in the UK for human
trafficking and modern day slavery. This
specific type of crime required more investment and was an example of a number
of areas where the Police could not deal with the problem alone. Matters arising from cases involving modern
slavery, domestic abuse, child sexual exploitation, and other serious crimes
very often had much wider implications and resource requirements than policing
alone. For these crimes to be tackled
successfully effective partnership working between all public bodies and
agencies was essential.
More than twelve months had elapsed since a
multiagency plan had been drawn up and agreed to deal with the increasing
problem of sexual exploitation. However,
the lack of progress made since its approval was disappointing. The Commissioner thought this was due to a
lack of commitment from partners. He
asked elected members to question the role of local authorities and seek
assurances that everything possible was being done to safeguard children and
the most vulnerable members of society.
Another project which he was keen to progress was one to support
children whose parents were in prison.
Whilst all six local authorities and the Health Board had participated
to establish the project, further progress seemed to have stalled.
The Commissioner emphasised that children and
young people were another of his priorities.
It was his opinion that the youth justice system had been ineffective
for years and that there was a need to intervene sooner to prevent children and
young people from finding their way into the criminal justice system in the
first place. He advised that the four
Police and Crime Commissioners in Wales were calling for powers in relation to
youth justice to be devolved as part of the Wales Bill as they felt that this
could improve the situation. In his view
the benefits of a restorative justice system far outweighed those of taking
young people to court.
In relation to his statutory responsibility for
awarding grants to prevent crime and disorder he advised that his office
currently provided funding to community safety partnerships across North
Wales. This was an arrangement that he
had inherited but did not support. He
would prefer to see a model where the Safer Communities Board, which presently
acted without funding, was given funding to commission services throughout the
year in order to deal with areas of concern.
He was willing to invest the grant to prevent crime and disorder in the
Safer Communities Board for the Board to commission prevention services
throughout the year and to ask partners to match fund his contribution. The Commissioner asked the Committee to
support this proposal so that together all partners could secure the provision
of front line services where they were most needed.
Responding to the Committee’s observations and
questions the Commissioner –
·
confirmed that he
contributed £17k to each of the six local authorities in North Wales towards
their CCTV services. He was willing to
speak to council officials regarding their proposed plans for returning to a 24
hour monitored service to explore possible support. However, he could not commit providing
financial resources towards proposals over and above his contribution to other
local authorities
·
agreed
that using volunteers to monitor CCTV footage was also an option that merited
further exploration
·
acknowledged that
there were concerns amongst the public with regards to the lack of visible Police
presence on the streets and in communities.
Due to the impact of austerity cuts, an increase in mental health
problems, collaboration work with other agencies, e.g. Ambulance Service and
the increase in ‘hidden’ crime rates, i.e. cyber-crime police officers now only
spent approximately 25% of their time undertaking ‘traditional’ police duties
·
confirmed
that a large number of Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs) and Special
Constables had joined the Police Service as part of their career progression
·
outlined the number
and varied roles of staff employed directly in the Commissioner’s team. The Commissioner’s office costs were in the
region of £800k per annum, this compared with the former Police Authority’s
annual costs of circa £750k. However the
Commissioner’s responsibilities were wider than those of the Police Authority
as he was responsible for commissioning services, some in partnership with
other public bodies etc., worth £4m to £5m
·
detailed the
complexities involved with investigating cyber-crime, the role of agencies such
as the National Crime Agency (NCA), international crime agencies, i.e. FBI, the
determination process for deciding who would lead national and international
investigations and who would undertake surveillance work on the ground,
including who would be responsible for bearing costs of such
investigations. The Home Office was keen
for police forces to work together to tackle cyber and digital crime and had
awarded Transformation Funding for a project to improve methods of sharing
crime data and crime images between forces
·
confirmed
that crimes such as murder investigations were extremely resource intensive and
expensive to conduct
·
advised that the
Rural Crime Team, established by his predecessor, was now well established. It had increased in size and capacity and now
included a PCSO. However, rural crime
could be reduced further if more farmers invested in security equipment or
technology such as dashcams etc., as footage from
such equipment could be used by the Police to catch and prosecute perpetrators
·
stated that there
would be an impact on the region, particularly on the Wrexham area, as a result
of the new prison HMP Berwyn. There
would be positive impacts on employment opportunities for the area and there
would also be implications on the local infrastructure such as schools, health
service establishments, etc. Potential
impacts on local policing requirements or crime rates were not yet known
·
confirmed that
PCSO’s and Special Constables had enforcing powers with respect to moving
vehicles which were causing an obstruction.
Special Constables, although volunteers, had more enforcement powers
than PSCO’s in a number of crime and disorder areas
·
advised that he was
not convinced that all police officers should be required to be educated to
degree level. For policing to be
effective officers should have a range of educational and inter-personal skills
·
advised of his view
that recreational drugs posed more of a threat if pushed ‘underground’. He felt that if they were regulated, similar
to alcohol, the problem could be better managed. In certain countries the use of drugs was
classed as a public health matter, not a criminal matter. In these countries drug users were not
entered into the criminal justice system they were instead offered
treatment. Drug dealers on the other
hand continued to be subject to the criminal justice system in those
countries. Due to the controversial
nature of this approach politicians in the UK were very reluctant to even
discuss the matter
·
confirmed
to the Chief Executive that he would appreciate a meeting with him with a view
to moving forward the multiagency plan to deal with the increasing problems of
child exploitation
·
advised members that
some of the grant funding allocated during his first year had been provided to
groups which supported work with victims of crime, as he was well aware that
the trauma for victims did not end once a court case had concluded. Some victims would require support for some
considerable length of time. He was also
aware that current high profile investigations, such as the Professor Alexis
Jay Independent Inquiry and the Offside Football Child Abuse Inquiry, would
place extra pressures on victim support groups and require additional financial
resources
·
confirmed that he
would be discussing with the Fire and Rescue Authority in the near future the
viability of using Fire and Rescue Service Staff who undertake Home Fire Safety
Checks (HFSCs) to alert the Police if they suspected domestic abuse in any homes
they entered. He was of the view that
this proposed partnership approach could help tackle domestic abuse in the
area.
Reference was made to problems with the 101
non-emergency police number which led to some callers being cut-off before
their call was answered. It seemed that
in these cases the cut-off was instigated by the caller’s telephone
provider. However members emphasised the
importance of the Police having a system in place to at least acknowledge the
call and advise that the call may be terminated if unanswered within a specific
period of time, or for the caller to leave a message for the service to call
them back.
At the conclusion of the discussion the Chair
thanked the Commissioner for attending and answering members’ questions and the
Committee –
RESOLVED to write to the Chief
Constable to seek clarity on the powers conferred on Police Community Support
Officers (PCSOs) and Special Constable with respect to enforcement action, and
to invite the Chief Constable to a future meeting to discuss his vision and
priorities for North Wales.
At this juncture (10.50 a.m.) the meeting
adjourned for a refreshment break.