Agenda item
PROCESS, METHODOLOGY AND CRITERIA FOR UNDERTAKING ROAD SAFETY AUDITS IN RELATION TO PLANNING APPLICATIONS
To examine the process, methodology and criteria for undertaking road
safety audits in relation to planning applications.
Minutes:
The Lead Member for Public Realm introduced the report and appendices
(previously circulated) and the Traffic, Parking and Road Safety Manager
detailed the process and methodology utilised for undertaking road safety audits
in relation to planning applications, including the criteria which merited the
requirements for a road safety audit. Responding to members’ questions
the Lead Member, Head of Service and the Traffic, Parking and Road Safety
Manager advised:
·
that a developer applying for planning permission
would appoint a design a consultant for the proposed development. As part
of the early design process a preliminary road safety audit would be
undertaken. This preliminary audit would consider matters such as visibility
at road junctions etc.;
·
all
road safety points raised by planning officers during the application process
would require to be documented in the final planning application, including the
measures that would be incorporated into the development plans to mitigate any
identified risks;
·
the ‘Design Manual for Roads and Bridges’
guidance, a copy of which was attached to the report, was the technical
document adhered to when undertaking road safety audits. This document
specified that at least one person undertaking the audit had to hold a
‘Certificate of Competency’. Upon receipt of the audit report one of the
Council’s qualified road safety engineers would quality assure the
assessment, and if necessary refer it back to the developer with a request that
any queries be addressed prior to the application moving forward to the next
stage;
·
any
proposed road markings or drainage plans included in planning applications
would be quality assured by qualified engineers employed by the Council;
·
once planning permission was granted, and if work
on the highways was one of the stipulated conditions for the granting of the
permission, the road safety audit process would proceed to Stage 2.
At this stage the developer would need to seek highway approval for changes to
the highway e.g. the building of a roundabout, line painting etc.;
Councillor Alice
Jones advised the Committee that, despite assurances given by officers of the
robustness and independence of the road safety audits, she was firmly of the
view that the process had failed residents of Bodelwyddan
during a recent planning application in the centre of the village. She
detailed to the Committee the circumstances relating to this particular
planning application, emphasising that in her view the Road Safety Audit
prepared for this application had not conformed to all the suggested criteria
listed in the section on ‘Road Safety Audit Brief’ in the ‘Design Manual for
Roads and Bridges’ document. Councillor Jones felt that a number of
important factors had been omitted or overlooked in the road safety audit for
this particular application e.g. disabled access, safe route to school etc.
Following an
in-depth discussion a consensus was reached that it would be useful if a
training workshop could be arranged for all Planning Committee members in order
to clarify the process, methodology and criteria for the road safety audit
process and its application in relation to planning applications. The
workshop should be a half-day session and be chaired by the Lead Member for
Public Realm and the Bodelwyddan example cited by
Councillor Alice Jones should be used as one of the examples at the
workshop. Any recommendations emanating from the workshop that required
formal elected member approval should be submitted to the Planning Committee
for approval in due course.
The Committee
therefore:
RESOLVED -
(i)
subject to the above
observations, to receive the report and the information imparted; and
(ii)
to request the Head of Planning
and Public Protection to arrange a half-day training workshop, to be chaired by
the Lead Member for Public Realm, for all members of the Council’s Planning
Committee on the process, methodology and criteria for the road safety audit
process and its application in relation to planning applications
Supporting documents:
- Road Safety Audits Scrutiny Report v4, item 9. PDF 65 KB
- Appendix A, item 9. PDF 337 KB
- Appendix B, item 9. PDF 194 KB
- Appendix C, item 9. PDF 25 KB