Agenda item
COUNTY-WIDE IMPACT OF THE INCREASE IN CAR PARKING CHARGES
- Meeting of Communities Scrutiny Committee, Thursday, 27 October 2016 9.30 am (Item 8.)
- View the declarations of interest for item 8.
To examine the impact on the county’s town centres of the increase in
car parking charges.
Minutes:
In his introduction
the Chair reminded the Committee that the methodology for setting appropriate
car parking charges across the county had been examined by the Committee in
July 2015 and that the Committee had recommended that the lower of the two
proposed charges be implemented. Decisions on fees and charges is a power
delegated to the Chief Officer and having considered all the relevant
information the Lead Officer had decided that it would better to charge the
higher of the two charges.
Consequently, when
implemented this decision had attracted some unfavourable reaction from
residents and businesses. In response to these concerns the Committee had
requested that a report on the impact of the increased charges on the county’s
towns be presented to members for consideration. The Chair welcomed two
members of the public who had attended the meeting and advised them that they
could share their observations with the Committee at the conclusion of the
report’s formal introduction.
Introducing the
report and associated appendices the Lead Member for Public Realm reminded the
Committee that the increases in parking charges introduced in April 2016 was
the first increase in Denbighshire since 2009. He emphasised that not all
charges had increased, for example the cost of an annual parking permit had
remained unaltered.
The long-standing
initiative permitting each town council to nominate five free parking days in
their town per year had also been retained, as had the practice of permitting
free car parking in each town from 3pm daily during the four weeks running up
to Christmas.
The Lead Member
informed the Committee that once notified of the new car parking tariffs two
town councils had been innovative and decided to subsidise parking charges in
their particular towns from within their own funds, others were of the view
that this was not necessary.
Addressing the Committee a member of the public present stated that:
·
she
had been surprised that only 35 complaints had been received, particularly as
she was personally aware of a petition that had been handed in from the Ruthin
area which had in excess of 1,100 signatures;
·
short
stay car parking charges had increased by 300%, which made Denbighshire’s car
parks considerably more expensive than those in neighbouring authorities;
·
as parking permits could only be purchased for
long stay car parks it meant that this restricted parking options for disabled
people.
During the discussion the following points were raised by Committee
members:
·
the
availability of annual parking permits needed to be promoted far more widely;
·
concerns
that due to such a substantial increase in parking charges people would be
looking at going shopping further afield, where charges were lower;
·
every
town had its own individual needs, and the impact had felt worse in Ruthin as
until this year the cost for motorists had been subsidised by monies given from
the from a fund established by local members during the previous Council’s term
of office. However, this fund had now ceased and as this coincided with
the introduction of the new charges, Ruthin had experienced a ‘double blow’
effect. Ruthin Town Council had decided not to adopt the approach adopted
by both Denbigh and Prestatyn Town Councils of subsidising parking costs in
their towns;
·
whilst
the income in the majority of car parks had increased since the introduction of
the new tariffs, there had been fewer actual ticket sales;
·
the
fact that parking tariffs were far lower in Mold than in Ruthin;
·
a
feeling that car parking was not a major problem in Rhyl due to the fact that
the major shops had relocated to Prestatyn, nevertheless people were reluctant
to park in the underground car park operated by the Council due to cars left
there being vandalised;
·
the
number of complaints should not be used as the only benchmark for residents and
others’ dissatisfaction with the new charges, consideration should be given to
previous car park users who were now driving elsewhere to shop or find parking
spaces, sometimes impacting on residential areas;
·
concerns
on the lack of designated motorcycle/scooter parking bays in the county’s car
park which resulted in smaller vehicles using full car parking bays in certain
car parks;
·
acknowledged that the recent
increase in car parking charges had caused some concern amongst residents,
nevertheless they were considerably lower than in some other areas,
particularly tourist areas. Reference was made by one councillor to a number
of places he had visited during the summer across North Wales and
Shropshire. Only in two places had he not parked in a public car park due
to excessive tariffs, both locations were coastal tourist towns in Gwynedd;
Councillor Rhys
Hughes registered his personal objection to town councils subsidising car
parking charges within their towns, as he was of the view that charges across
the county should be uniform and consistent.
Other members
present stated that whilst everyone would like free parking, the reality of the
current financial climate meant that this was not possible if the Council
wanted to invest in its car parks. Whilst it was acknowledged that
parking charges may have an impact on town centre footfall and businesses in
general, the public’s shopping habits had also changed. People tended to
visit out of town retail parks, Sunday shopping and even 24 hour shopping was
now available in a number of places, as well as internet shopping. All of
these aspects had impacted on traditional town centre shopping.
There was no
quantifiable evidence to demonstrate whether the £50K subsidy given by local
members in the Ruthin area to subsidise parking charges over a five year period
had actually made a difference to footfall or businesses in the town.
Committee members were also reminded that Denbighshire had its own out of town
outlets e.g. Tweedmill and the Clwyd Retail Park
which employed a number of residents and contributed towards the local
economy.
Responding to the points raised the Lead Member and officers advised
that:
·
the number of complaints received, a total of 35,
referred to the number of individual specific complaints received via the
Council’s Customer Services Centre. Signed petitions were not included in
these figures;
·
recommendation
9 in appendix 2 recognised the need to promote the availability of annual
parking permits and of exploring the viability of an option to pay for annual
permits by instalments;
·
parking permits were only available for long
stay car parks, the only exception being Market Street car park in
Llangollen. The rationale behind this was that long stay car parks were
more likely to be used by people who were working rather than shoppers;
·
whilst
percentage wise a 300% increase did seem a very steep hike, in money terms it
related to short stay car parks where the cost of the minimum stay had actually
increased by 20p;
·
the
Council would not want to revise parking charges on a regular basis as
undertaking such an exercise has some considerable associated costs i.e. the
reprogramming of the pay and display meters across the county cost £11K, this
did not include staffing costs;
·
Denbigh
Member Area Group (MAG) had requested Parking Services officers to attend a
meeting of Denbigh Town Council to discuss the car parking charges
increase. It was as a result of that meeting that the Town Council
offered to introduce a subsidy;
·
whilst the number of actual tickets sold was
lower than during the same period the previous year, the number of annual
permits sold had increased considerably by 18%. Further work was required
on this data, including a footfall survey in order to analyse the actual impact
on town centre businesses, but initial analysis of ticket sale figures seemed
to suggest that individuals who had in the past purchased two half day tickets
were now purchasing annual permits because this was cheaper in the long run;
·
with respect to parking charges in car parks in
Flintshire, car parking charges in Mold were subsidised by the town council
whereas elsewhere in the county car parking charges were higher. With
respect to comparison with other counties Denbighshire’s new tariffs were on a
par with Conwy County Borough Council and other neighbouring authorities;
·
the
availability of parking spaces, both short stay and long stay did not seem to
be as much of an issue in Rhyl as elsewhere in the county, as the town had a
number of easily accessible public and private car parks;
·
they
were aware of the lack of designated motorcycle/disability scooter/cycle
parking bays in the county and were currently working on plans to address this
shortage;
·
all council-owned car parks across the county were
subject to the same charging regime, however some town councils had opted to
subsidise the charges and were therefore reimbursing the County Council the
balance of income due from those car parks. The County Council was
therefore receiving full payment for each ticket purchased;
·
the Council had committed to invest in the
county’s car parks in the long-term. An asset management review was
currently underway in relation to all county owned car parks with a view to
establishing the level of maintenance and improvement works required in each
one, including a list of priority projects. It was envisaged that
replacing all pay and display machines with better quality, more functional
machines would cost in the region of £300K to £400K.
·
there
was a need to update and improve signage and undertake public realm work to
make car parks more welcoming, particularly as they were the gateway to
Denbighshire for tourists etc.;
·
the
draft asset management plan could be presented to scrutiny for consultation in
due course if members so wished;
·
a decision had been taken not to vary the cost
of an hour’s car parking between long and short stay car parks. It was
only the three hour rated that had been varied;
·
discussions
were currently underway with the Council’s Property Services Department on the
viability of opening staff car parks as pay and display car parks at weekends
and bank holidays etc., in particular the one in County Hall, now that the
building and land was owned by the Council;
·
parking
enforcement officers did enforce parking rules on Sundays up until the end of
October, and continued with their enforcement work on Sundays after that date
when events were being held;
·
a number of innovative options should be
explored to help deliver the corporate priorities of developing the local
economy, having clean and tidy streets, and investing in the county’s forty
plus car parks. These included transferable car park passes, hotel and
B&B parking voucher schemes etc.; and
·
information
sharing on the changes in car parking charges would have benefitted from better
communication across the county, particularly the benefits of purchasing annual
permits
The Chair advised
the Committee that in future the Chief Officer delegated decision process would
be subject to the same level of scrutiny, including an option of calling-in a
decision for scrutiny, as Cabinet and Lead Member delegated decisions were at
present.
At the conclusion
of the discussion the Committee was of the view that there was no merit in
reviewing the car parking charges at present and that there would be far more
benefit in adopting a proactive approach to managing and investing in the
Council’s car parks. There was also a need to keep residents informed of
plans and developments for the Council’s car parks. Following a detailed
discussion the Committee:
RESOLVED: subject to the above observations, recommended
that:
(i)
The Council
retain the existing County-wide charging scheme, (as detailed in Appendix B to
the report).
(ii)
Officers could
amend the management arrangements in car parks, including introducing
variations to the County-wide charging scheme, through discussions with MAGs,
Town Councils and the Lead Member.
(iii)
Officers should
attend each of the six Member Area Groups (MAGs) over the next six months
(October 2016 to March 2017) to discuss the management arrangements for the car
parks in their area.
(iv)
a car park asset
management plan be developed to help prioritise investment, to include more
modern pay and display machines; improved signage; improved general
maintenance, environmental improvements including additional planting etc.
(v)
options be explored for
using parking payment machines to issue vouchers for use in local shops, cafes
and Council facilities. This could range from simple printed vouchers that
print on the rear of every ticket to more sophisticated payment machines that
offer multiple options.
(vi)
pay and display tickets should be made
transferable between car parks within the County to improve flexibility especially
for visitors, so someone could buy an all-day ticket in one car park, which
would allow parking that day in any other Council car park across Denbighshire.
(vii)
potential expansion of
the existing parking permit system to include more options aimed at tourists be
explored. For example, parking permits with a duration of one week, or one
weekend could be sold in local newsagents, as they do in places like Jersey.
(viii)
officers look at options
for hotel and B&B parking voucher schemes which would allow hoteliers to
issue their guests with a permit/parking voucher to cover the duration of the
stay, and avoid instances of guests having to go out to buy a pay and display
ticket first thing in the morning to avoid receiving a parking fine.
(ix)
Better promote the annual long stay parking
permit and consider the introduction of payment in instalments and
(x)
a further progress report be presented to the Committee in six months’
time on the impact of the increase in car parking charges, along with the draft
car park asset management plan for members’ observations.
Supporting documents:
- Parking Charges Impact Scrutiny Report v3, item 8. PDF 68 KB
- APPENDIX A, item 8. PDF 15 KB
- APPENDIX B, item 8. PDF 29 KB
- APPENDIX C income comparison, item 8. PDF 36 KB
- APPENDIX D1, item 8. PDF 43 KB
- APPENDIX D2, item 8. PDF 43 KB
- APPENDIX E, item 8. PDF 27 KB
- Appendix F, item 8. PDF 25 KB