Issue - meetings
YOUR VOICE COMPLAINTS PERFORMANCE - QUARTER 2
Meeting: 29/11/2012 - Performance Scrutiny Committee (Item 7)
7 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVEALED THROUGH THE COMPLAINTS PROCESS PDF 45 KB
To consider a report by the Corporate Complaints Officer (copy attached) which presented an analysis of the feedback received via Denbighshire’s feedback policy `Your Voice` for Quarter 2 of 2012/13.
10.45 a.m.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
A
copy of a report by
the Corporate Complaints Officer had been circulated with the papers for the meeting.
The Customer Relationship
Manager introduced the report which presented an analysis of the feedback received via Denbighshire County
Council’s customer feedback policy ‘Your Voice’ for Quarter 2 of 2012/13. The Corporate Complaints Officer
(CCO) summarised the report which identified the key areas detailed below:-
Highlights – The Councils
response time to complaints within the ‘Your Voice’ timescales in Quarter 2 was
down from 91% to 87% in the previous quarter and continued to be short of the
corporate target of 95%.
Complaint response times -
Although the overall performance of the Council had dropped there were a number
of points to note.
·
A number of complaints had been incorrectly allocated to services and
reallocated under the heading of ‘Other’.
This had impacted on the overall performance figures as these complaints
had been dealt with outside of target.
·
Housing Services had ‘stabilised’ their
performance following the restructure.
·
Environmental Services continued to perform well despite having had the
highest volume of complaints. Their
performance had not suffered significantly despite a 69% increase in the
complaints received during the quarter.
·
The complaint volumes for Highways had increased by 38% in the
quarter. However, performance had only
slipped slightly.
·
Stage 1 complaints were said to relate to failure to respond within the recognised timescales, with 87% of Stage 1 complaints
having been responded to within an appropriately timeframe.
Improving performance - The
corporate aim had been to respond to at least 95% of complaints within the
stated timescales. The main area of
concern had been responding to Stage 1 complaints outside the 10 working day
timescale. A meeting with service
complaints and performance officers had been held in November to further
reinforce this aspect of performance and one aim would be to ascertain why complaints
were not responded to within timescale.
The findings from the meeting would assist in formulating an action plan
to improve this aspect of complaint handling with the results fed back to the
Committee when the next report is presented in February. A monthly report had been introduced in
September for meetings of the Senior Leadership Team (SLT) highlighting
performance in regards responding to complaints.
In
response to a question from Councillor A. Roberts, the (CCO) confirmed that all complaints received should be directed through the
Customer Relationship Management system.
The Customer Relationship Manager
responded to a question from Councillor
M.Ll. Davies and provided an outline of how
the timescales in respect of complaint response times had been set. He confirmed that consideration was currently
being afforded to adopting a two stage policy as advised by the Local
Government Ombudsman. In reply to
concerns raised by Councillor D. Owens it was explained that, depending on the
nature of the complaint, responses could be provided within shorter
timescale. In cases where timescales
could not be adhered to customers would be informed accordingly.
Following
further discussion, it was:-
RESOLVED – that Performance Scrutiny
Committee receives the report and notes the performance
of services.