Agenda item
INTERNAL AUDIT PROGRESS REPORT
To consider a report by the Head of Internal Audit (copy
enclosed) which provides an update on
Internal Audit’s latest progress in terms of its service delivery, assurance
provision, reviews completed, performance and
effectiveness in driving improvement.
Minutes:
A
copy of a report by the Head of Internal Audit (HIA) had been circulated
previously.
The
AM introduced the report on the latest progress of the Internal Audit Service in
terms of its service delivery, assurance provision, reviews completed,
performance and effectiveness in driving improvement.
The report provided an update in respect of:-
·
delivery
of the Assurance Plan for 2013/14
·
recent
Internal Audit reports issued
·
management’s
response to issues raised
·
Internal
Audit’s performance
The AM explained
that Appendix 1 provided a breakdown of work undertaken by Internal Audit
during 2013/14, compared to the Internal Audit Strategy. It included assurance scores and number of
issues raised for the completed reviews, definitions used to form our
audit assurance and the ratings used to assess the risk-levels for issues
raised.
The following reports issued since September, 2013
had been circulated:-
-
Settlement Agreements
-
Deputy for Finance (Court of Protection)
-
Ysgol Brynhyfryd, Ruthin
Executive
Summary Reports and Action Plans had been appended to the report for further
information.
Management’s
response to issues raised by Internal Audit had been summarised and most
Internal Audit reports identified risks and control weaknesses. These had been rated as critical, major or
moderate risk and management agreed actions to address the risks, including
responsibilities and timescales. All
instances were reported where management had failed to respond to follow up work, or where they exceed the agreed implementation date by
more than three months. The Committee
would decide if further action was required.
Information
pertaining to reports which had been followed up had been included in the
report. The AM confirmed that a further
breakdown of all issues followed up had been detailed in the report, as
requested at a previous meeting. No
responses had been received to three Action Plan follow ups requested on the 1st
October, 2013. Reminders had been issued
on the 23rd October, but responses had not been received in time for
the progress report. However, the AM
advised that confirmation of progress to date had been received in all cases
following the report deadline. Details
pertaining to Internal Audit Performance had been included in the report with
added detail provided in respect of the percentage of essential assurance work,
as previously requested.
The AM provided a summary
of each of the reports circulated:-
(i)
Settlement
Agreement:-
Members
were informed that in undertaking an analysis of salary payments for 2012/13,
as part of the financial assurance testing, six payments had been identified as
settlement agreements. Work undertaken
had involved analysing case files and considering the overall process to ensure
that:-
·
the Council had a formal policy /code of practice and procedures
for dealing with ‘settlement agreements’;
·
such agreements were formally considered and approved, based on a
robust business case;
·
relevant advice was sought in all cases; and
·
all settlements made during 2012/13 were reasonable and valid.
The Corporate
Director: Economic and Community Ambition (CD:ECA) referred to the ACAS Code
and emphasised that settlement agreements’ were a recognised method of dealing
with employment issues, in both the private and public sectors, and were not
perceived as a replacement for good management practice. It was explained that the agreements had been
utilised appropriately and generally applied as a last resort. Members were informed that the Internal Audit
Review had been very helpful and had identified a requirement to formalise the
arrangements for initiating and approving settlement agreements. Figures quoted in the press would have
included contractual payments which employees would be entitled to regardless
of a settlement agreement, and it was explained that it would be misleading to
refer to a “settlement agreement” as a “gagging order”.
Audit Opinion had
identified the need for the Council to formalise its
arrangements for dealing with ‘settlement agreements’. There was currently no formal policy for
dealing with cases and no formal procedures to follow to ensure consistency, fairness
and openness and to provide an approved business case for each agreement. Three major issues had been raised in the
Action Plan which required discussion and agreement prior to the Council
entering into further negotiations of any settlement agreements’. A copy of the Action Plan had been included
and a summary of the issues, and judgements made prior to agreeing a
settlement, was provided by the CD:ECA, who welcomed
the recommendations in the report. The
AM confirmed that work on producing the report had commenced prior to the
publication of an article on settlement agreements in the press.
Confirmation
was provided that there was no specific reason for the increase in settlements
during 2012/13, other than the complexities of employer and employee
relationships. The CD:ECA
explained that there were no trends relating to specific Departments, and that
the number of settlements relating to staff in schools correlated to the
percentage of staff employed in the Education Service. She also referred to the added dimension of
the role of School Governing Bodies with regard to the management of
schools. Members were informed that a
Support Officer had been appointed to provide assistance to School Governing
Bodies, together with, the provision of additional training, and Finance and HR
officers had been appointed to school clusters to provide advice and assist
with the management process. The Chair
requested that information be provided regarding work currently being
undertaken in respect of training on employment issues.
The CD:ECA emphasised the importance of good management in HR
practice, and suggested that a review of training provision for Governing
Bodies be undertaken. Councillor M.L.
Holland, whilst accepting the difficulties involved, made reference to the
possible utilisation of performance appraisals in the Education Service.
Mr P. Whitham referred to the reputational risk to the Council
and suggested that consideration be afforded to the publication, in the public
domain, of improvements in the audit report.
The HLDS explained that the audit report proposed the adoption of a
formal policy and procedure, to be applied across the Council, which could be
presented to the Committee when formulated.
During the ensuing
discussion, Members agreed that Committee receive a further report, including a
copy of the draft policy and procedures, in January, 2014. The Chair also requested that a report on
employment issues, the implementation of the HR strategy in school clusters and
the provision of training for School Governing Bodies also be presented to the
meeting of the Committee in January, 2014.
(ii)
Deputy
for Finance (Court of Protection), and
(iii) Ysgol Brynhyfryd, Ruthin:-
The AM confirmed
that both reports had been very positive and the Committee received and noted
the contents therein.
Members of the Committee had previously requested that they
be afforded the opportunity to discuss any audit reports with an orange or red
assurance rating, low or no assurance, issued after the deadline for the
Committee reports. The report on
Procurement of Construction Services, issued on the 29th October,
2013, was circulated at the meeting.
(iv)
Procurement of Construction Services:-
The HFA introduced the report and explained that the
review of the
Procurement of Construction Services had been undertaken at the request of the
HFA to assess the existing processes for spending on construction work and to
identify opportunities for efficiencies.
Due to significant changes, which included the increased involvement of
external bodies such as Welsh Government, the current Procurement Strategy
required updating to integrate with the development of the Economic Development
Strategy. He outlined the timescales for
the work being undertaken and confirmed that the scope of the review had
covered the procurement strategy, roles and responsibilities, policies and
procedures, approved lists and tendering and contractor selection. The importance of liaising with the respective Directorates was emphasised
to ensure consistency across the Council when coordinating the various
contracts.
In response to
concerns raised by Councillor P.C. Duffy, the Property Manager explained that
there was no mechanism in place to restrict schools from engaging contractors
of their choice to undertake work on their respective sites. The HFA confirmed that schools were
responsible for managing their own budgets and outlined the difficulties
encountered in relation to delegation and schools. The Acting Strategic Procurement Manager and
Construction Design and Management Coordinator had attended a school finance
managers meeting to outline liability and procurement procedures with regard to
schools undertaking the services of contractors. Details of the roles and remit of school
finance and business managers, in relation to school clusters, were summarised
for Mr P. Whitham.
In response to a
question from the Chair, the Senior Auditor confirmed that a follow up report
on the Procurement of Construction Services
would be undertaken in February, 2014, and a progress report could be submitted
to the March, 2014 meeting of the Committee.
Following further
discussion, it was:-
RESOLVED – that
Corporate Governance Committee:-
(a)
notes
Internal Audit’s progress and performance to date in 2013/14.
(b)
receives
and notes the recent Internal Audit reports issued and follow ups carried out.
(c)
requests a progress report on
Settlement Agreements, including a copy of the draft policy and procedures, be
presented to the Committee in January, 2014, together with, the inclusion of
information in respect of employment issues, the implementation of the HR
strategy in school clusters and details of the provision of training for
Schools and their respective Governing Bodies, and
(d)
agrees
that a progress report be submitted to the March, 2014 meeting of the Committee
in respect of Procurement
of Construction Services.
(PM, IB, BS and LL to Action)
Supporting documents:
- Int Audit Progress Report, item 8. PDF 33 KB
- Int Audit Progress Report - Appendix, item 8. PDF 297 KB
- Sum Int Audit Reports, item 8. PDF 508 KB