Agenda item
ESTYN REPORT ON RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS
To receive a report by the Systems Leader for GwE (copy enclosed) presenting Estyn’s report on the standards of teaching and learning in Religious Education within the secondary school sector published in June 2013.
Minutes:
The Systems Leader
for GwE (SL) presented Estyn’s
report on the standards of teaching and learning in Religious Education within
the secondary school sector published in June 2013 (previously
circulated). He also reported upon his
attendance at the National WASACRE Conference the previous day during which key
messages from the Estyn Thematic Review for RE were
discussed together with the national priorities of Literacy and Numeracy
through RE. The keynote speakers at the
Conference were –
-
Mark
Campion, Estyn – The Estyn
Thematic Review of RE
-
Richard
Roberts, CfBT – Literacy & Numeracy Framework
A sample of 20
secondary schools had been inspected in Wales as part of the study (Ofsted had
visited 70 schools in England) and the report included standards in Key Stages
3 & 4, attainment in GCSE religious studies and participation and
engagement in learning. It also covered
factors affecting standards including curriculum planning, teaching, assessment,
leadership, improving quality and external
influences. Members’ attention was drawn
to the following main findings –
·
results
in Wales had been very positive with more pupils gaining a qualification in RE
than in any other non-core subject
·
numbers
taking both the full and short GCSE course in Religious Studies had risen over
the last five years with just over a quarter of pupils entered in the full
course and just over half of pupils entered in the short course
·
attainment
had risen steadily in the full course and was well above the average for other
subjects and although attainment had fallen in the short course performance
remained consistently better than the UK
·
the gap
in attainment between girls and boys was wider in Wales for both courses than
across the UK
·
standards
were good in the majority of schools at Key Stage 3 but there were a few
schools where standards were unsatisfactory and there was a recommendation to ensure tasks were
challenging enough to enable more able pupils to reach higher levels – since
publication of the report training had been provided for Denbighshire teachers
in order to improve the accuracy of teacher assessment of pupils’ levels at Key
Stage 3
·
non-specialist
teachers were used to teach RE and the short course although they were rarely
used to teach the full course – non-specialist teachers had not had a negative
impact on standards in most schools
·
self-evaluation
was good or better in only a minority of RE departments and it was a
recommendation to strengthen self-evaluation and use data to identify where and
what to improve
·
lack of
opportunities for professional development and learning networks had been
identified meaning good practice was not shared enough and challenges were not
addressed effectively.
The SL also elaborated upon the recommendations
arising from the report. In terms of the
Welsh Government (WG) recommendation R7 that attainment data for RE and RS be
dealt with in the same way as non-core subjects, the WG had responded that it
would not be appropriate to progress that recommendation in light of the
on-going curriculum review for Key Stage 3.
The final recommendation R8 was that WG work with local authorities and
SACREs to improve the opportunities for professional development and support
learning networks for teachers of religious education. Networks had disappeared in Denbighshire
following the removal of the learning adviser posts and in order to progress
that recommendation it was proposed that a letter be sent to Denbighshire’s
Head of Education, Karen Evans enquiring about opportunities and support for RE
teachers and offering SACRE’s support in that regard. WASACRE was also very much about providing
support for teachers under that recommendation.
Members discussed the recommendations for
schools detailed within the report and how best to address the attainment gap
between boys and girls. It was noted
that this was also an issue in other subject areas and the Chair referred to
local strategies which had been introduced to address gender discrepancies
within Denbighshire with positive results.
The SL advised that WASACRE had considered its responsibilities in
supporting teachers and was looking to address the issue through training
provision. It was agreed to contact the
Head of Education, Karen Evans to enquire as to any local strategies which
could be implemented with a view to raising attainment for boys in terms of RE.
SACRE also considered the finding that
non-specialist teachers did not have a negative impact on standards in most
schools and the need to raise awareness of this issue. It was acknowledged that teaching skills did
not change across subjects and different subjects could be taught well by
non-specialists. The SL reported upon
his own experience of RE teaching and the importance of a robust scheme of work
and lesson plans in order to share good practice and raise standards. However some concerns were also raised that
some teachers did not have the knowledge and enthusiasm to teach non-specialist
subjects and there was a need for specialist teachers. It was also highlighted that attainment in
the full GCSE course had risen over the last five years where specialist
teachers were used but that attainment in the short GCSE course had fallen
where non-specialist teachers were used.
The reason for the fall in attainment in the short course had been
explained by some schools using the short course to ensure that the majority of
pupils received a qualification in RE and stream the more able candidates to
the full course. This raised the question
as to whether those pupils entering the short course would have achieved a
better result if they had been taught by specialist teachers. Members also noted that the short GCSE course was worth half
a full GCSE and schools tended to opt for that course because it could be
carried out in the time set aside to cover the legal requirement for RE – hence
the recommendation (R2) to consider giving all pupils the opportunity to gain
an appropriate qualification at Key Stage 4.
When discussing standards of achievement
members highlighted that the benefits and value of RE could not always be
measured in academic achievement. It was
also suggested that SACRE’s previous practice of receiving presentations on the
provision of RE and collective worship within schools be revived.
At the end of debate Mr.
Gavin Craigen highlighted two aspects of Mark
Campion’s presentation at the National WASACRE Conference –
·
the fact
that almost all pupils respected the opinions and beliefs of others and valued
what they were learning in RE which was a positive message which should be
promoted and shared with others, and
·
standards
of teaching in schools was excellent with very few lessons deemed
unsatisfactory and teaching in RE was significantly better than in other
subjects.
Mr Craigen supported
the proposal to write to the Head of Education regarding learning networks but
felt the issue should be explored in the wider community and consortia
arrangements currently in place. He also
felt the report should be brought to the attention of schools to consider the
recommendations. After further
discussion it was –
RESOLVED that –
(a) the
report be received and noted, and
(b) a letter be sent on behalf of
SACRE to Denbighshire’s Head of Education Karen Evans making enquiries into the
following –
- any local strategies which could be implemented with a view to raising attainment for boys in terms of RE
- opportunities and support for RE teachers in terms of professional development and support learning networks (including consortia arrangements) and offering SACRE’s support in that regard, and
- how best to bring the report to the attention of schools to consider the recommendations pertinent to them.
Supporting documents:
- ITEM 9 - ESTYN REPORT ON RE SECONDARY SCHOOLS, item 9. PDF 71 KB
- ITEM NO. 9 - ESTYN REPORT - REPORT E, item 9. PDF 711 KB