Agenda item
URGENT MATTERS
Notice of
items which, in the opinion of the Chair, should be considered at the meeting
as a matter of urgency pursuant to Section 100B(4) of the
Local Government Act 1972.
Decision:
The Leader raised the following urgent matter – Roll out of the new Recycling and Waste Collection Service.
Minutes:
The Leader
apologised on behalf of the Council to residents affected by problems
associated with the roll out of the new service and to members who had been
working hard on behalf of residents. He also thanked members for reporting
missed collections in their wards and residents for their patience and efforts
in recycling.
The Leader advised
that he had been in daily contact with the Chief Executive, Corporate Director:
Environment and Economy and Lead Member regarding the situation. Whilst collection rates had improved it was
clear there needed to be a massive increase in pace and improvement to address
the backlog and work to ensure the system was operating properly. The Leader provided assurances that both he
and the Lead Member were providing rigorous challenge to officers to ensure the
problems were dealt with as quickly as possible and all were working as hard as
possible to clear the backlog, address the problems, and ensure the system was
operating correctly going forward. The
events surrounding the roll out of the new system would be subject to a public
scrutiny inquiry and that process would commence at the earliest opportunity
following the election with a special meeting of the Scrutiny Chairs and Vice
Chairs Group convened for 8 July.
The Lead Member,
Councillor Barry Mellor submitted his apologies to members and residents. He added that the roll out was brought
forward by the previous Cabinet but as a Cabinet they believed it was the right
thing to do and carried on with that.
Councillor Mellor stressed that it was an operational problem and he had
been in regular contact with the relevant officers to drive an increase in the
pace of improvement. Together with the
Chief Executive and Corporate Director he had been out with the crews to see
first-hand the difficulties residents were facing and the hard work of the
crews who were putting in extra shifts to address the backlog. Consequently, he was confident that the
issues would be addressed, and the system would be successfully embedded,
although not as quickly as envisaged. He
thanked residents for their patience and provided assurances that all was being
done to achieve the benefits the new system would bring as quickly as possible.
The Leader
permitted questions but reminded members that scrutiny of the roll out of the
new service was a separate process via a member-led inquiry.
During debate
members took the opportunity to express their concern and distress over the
roll out of the new service and the impact on residents with numerous examples
of problems within different ward areas, particularly in rural areas. In speaking on behalf of the Independent
Group, Councillor Huw Hilditch-Roberts wished to convey their thanks to the
crews and operatives on the frontline who were working hard in difficult
circumstances. He also wished it to be
recorded that the former Cabinet voted on the concept of the new service and
not its implementation. Members raised
specific questions and concerns regarding various aspects of the service roll
out and key failings and sought assurances regarding steps to address both the
current backlog and ensure the system operated efficiently going forward, and a
number of suggestions were also put forward in that regard.
The Leader, Lead
Member, Chief Executive, Corporate Director and Monitoring Officer responded to
the questions and issues raised as follows –
·
the impact on residents detrimentally affected
by the service change was unacceptable and the Council was truly sorry for the
distress caused as a result
·
collection rates in the rural areas of the
county were lower than in the North where the majority of collections had been
completed and additional resource had been targeted in the rural areas to
address the issue
·
senior managers, operational staff, and WRAP
(Waste and Resources Action Programme) were working together on actions to
address the problems
·
additional resources had been directed to the
new service for a temporary period until operations were running smoothly
·
the backlog was essentially being addressed by
more staff, driving more vehicles, for more hours with a shift system to
maximise fleet hours during the week and also deploying a full fleet on
Saturday
·
once the backlog had been cleared a review could
be carried out into the different routes to ensure they were being completed
consistently going forward
·
council staff were being redeployed on a
temporary basis from other non-critical work and agency staff were being
recruited in the short term, other options considered to increase capacity on a
temporary basis included commissioning waste companies and contacting
neighbouring local authorities for assistance
·
confirmed that smaller vans were being utilised
in the rural areas to carry out collections in those areas which had been given
high priority
·
it was not thought that missed garden waste
collections was a widespread issue and the Corporate Director agreed to look
into the matter and possible review of the subscription and provide an update
to members outside of the meeting
·
under the previous system food waste had been
collected separately but it was collected with the recycling under the new
system
·
steps were being introduced to deal with the
backlog of food waste and areas that had not had a collection for some weeks
were being prioritised with routes created for specific crews in smaller
vehicles to collect in those areas
·
there had been issues across the whole of the
county which had made it difficult to prioritise and target resources
correctly, and there was a need to prioritise those households who had not had
a collection for the longest time
·
the Leader advised that he took full
accountability that the roll out happened on his watch and did not blame the
previous Cabinet for the circumstances of the roll out – his efforts now
concentrated on maximising capacity and clearing the backlog. The system itself agreed by the previous
Cabinet and taken up by the current Cabinet was the correct one once it was
properly operational
·
the Head of Highways and Environmental Services
had been on the frontline on a daily basis and had been involved in the two
member briefings on the roll out; he would also be available to participate in
the forthcoming scrutiny process
·
it had not been possible to convene a meeting of
the Scrutiny Chairs and Vice Chairs Group prior to 8 July due to the
pre-election period and scrutiny support staff working full time on the
election, and the proposal for the scrutiny process was outlined which
culminated in a public scrutiny inquiry of the service roll out.
At the conclusion
of the debate the Chair thanked everyone for their contributions.