Agenda item
REVIEW OF CABINET DECISION RELATING TO SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES FOR LEARNING - ROLLING PROGRAMME
- Meeting of Partnerships Scrutiny Committee, Thursday, 16 May 2024 10.00 am (Item 6.)
- View the declarations of interest for item 6.
To consider a report by the Scrutiny Co-ordinator (copy
attached) the purpose of which is to seek the Committee, in accordance with
the Council’s Call-In Procedure Rules, to review the decision taken by Cabinet
on 23 April 2024.
10.15am – 11.15am
Minutes:
Prior to the commencement of this business item the Chair
welcomed the Lead Member for Education, Children and Families; Corporate
Director: Social Services and Education;
Head of Education; Principal Manager:
School Support along with a number of other officers from various
Council services to the meeting for the discussion on the Cabinet decision
called-in for review under the Council’s Call-in Procedure Rules. She also welcomed the lead signatory to the
‘Notice of Call-in’ and his co-signatories to the meeting to present their
case.
The Scrutiny Co-ordinator introduced the report and
appendices (previously circulated) which outlined the Cabinet decision
called-in for review, the reasons given for seeking a review of the decision
and the process that would be followed at the meeting. She also advised that as the decision
called-in for review related to statutory education provision in the county the
Education Co-opted Members on the Council’s Scrutiny Committees were in
attendance and were members of the Committee with full voting rights for this particular business item.
Prior to the commencement of the discussion the Committee
was advised by the Monitoring Officer of the importance of focussing on the
decision taken by Cabinet on 23 April 2024, relating to the draft Strategic
Outline Programme (SOP) for the ‘Sustainable Communities for Learning – Rolling
Programme’, which was the subject of the Notice of Call-in and not on any past
or potential future decisions which may be taken in relation to proposed
programme.
Councillor Mark Young, as the lead signatory to the Notice
of Call-in, introduced and summarised the call-in request on behalf of himself
and his co-signatories, explaining that the rationale for calling-in the
decision was based on the need for good governance, evidence based
decision-making, along with extensive and effective consultation with all
stakeholders in relation to the ‘disposal’ of a green-space playing field in
accordance with Regulations and Guidance referred to in the ‘Notice of Call-In
of Decision’ submitted. During his
introduction Councillor Young referred to the need to consult with bodies such
as Sport Wales, local schools in Denbigh, local elected members, local
community, and sports organisations, which both he and his co-signatories felt
had not been widely consulted with in relation to the ‘disposal/change of use’
of the playing field in order to accommodate the new
building for Ysgol Plas Brondyffryn. The
signatories were firmly of the view that under the Council’s Local Development
Plan (LDP) sports fields were protected from development unless they were
designated as surplus to requirement.
Co-signatories Councillors Merfyn Parry, Pauline Edwards and Elfed
Williams outlined their reasons for consenting to the calling-in of the
decision stating that an assessment should be undertaken on the availability of
green space provision in Denbigh and made available to local members and
residents. Provision of an assessment of
all known risks associated with the proposals along with evidence of the
extensive consultation undertaken with all stakeholders should also have been
made available. Councillor Geraint
Lloyd-Williams was not in attendance to present his reasons for agreeing to be
a signatory to the ‘Notice of Call-In’.
Responding to the points raised in calling-in the decision
the Lead Member advised that the Monitoring Officer was of the view that the
issues of affordability, loss, and reinstatement/replacement of playing fields
would be issues to be addressed as part of developing the full business case
for the project prior to submission to the Capital Scrutiny Group (CSG) for
consideration. The playing fields
element would feature as part of the planning application process. None of these factors had any bearing on the
Cabinet decision of 23 April 2024. That
decision related to the SOP which outlined the Council’s proposed programme of
projects to submit to Welsh Government (WG) with a view to bidding for
investment available under the WG’s ‘Sustainable Communities for Learning’
Programme (formerly known as 21st Century Schools Programme) to
improve and enhance educational facilities in the county over the forthcoming
years. The ‘Sustainable Communities for
Learning’ Programme’ was a nine-year investment programme available to local
authorities to apply for funding to improve and enhance their schools’ estate.
The Monitoring Officer advised that the ‘Notice of Call-in’
referred to legislation and statutory guidance that were applicable in
Wales. However, under the law, neither
of these were relevant to the decision called-in for review, as the term
‘disposal’ was defined in law as ‘the grant of estate or an interest in land’
i.e., sale. The statutory guidance
document provided various examples of where the guidance was applicable, all of
which related to the sale of playing fields.
The decision called-in for review did not contain proposals to sell any
of the land which had been earmarked for the development of Ysgol Plas
Brondyffryn, which the signatories to the call-in confirmed was the playing
fields referred to in their ‘Notice of Call-in’. This land was currently in the ownership of
the Council and would remain so under the proposed programme of investment
contained in the SOP.
The Lead Member advised the Committee that the WG had
changed its approach to future capital investment in school estates in Wales
from the five-year investment bands under the 21st Century Schools
Programme to a more flexible nine-year investment programme, divided into three
blocks of three-years each, under the ‘Sustainable Communities for Learning -
Rolling Programme’. As a result of this
change in approach WG had asked local authorities to identify projects which
were essentially ready for business cases to be progressed within the next
three years, those currently under development and likely to be undergoing
statutory consultation in the second three-year block, along with projects
which were likely to be in the pipeline during the final three-year block, for
inclusion in a SOP for submission to WG to bid for funding under the
Programme. The decision taken by Cabinet
on 23 April related to submitting a bid to WG for funding under the Sustainable
Communities for Learning Programme to further develop these projects with a
view to delivering them in due course.
Business cases, planning permission etc. would follow at a later
stage. In compiling the SOP the Council had reviewed all 21st Century
Schools Band B projects, developed and agreed by the previous administration,
which had been impacted by various delays and recommended their inclusion in
the SOP for the new Sustainable Communities for Learning Programme. In addition, it had included the project for
Ysgol y Castell, Rhuddlan with the former Band B projects for delivery under
the new Programme. The Lead Member gave
an overview of each Band B school’s current position in relation to the Royal
Institute of British Architects (RIBA) design and development stages. Reference was included in the Cabinet report
(Annex B to the report to the Committee) to other projects which may require
investment in later years, subject to the availability of funding.
A proposed £60m investment programme in the county’s school
estate portfolio was welcomed by the Council’s Head of Education, particularly
given the austere financial times within which public services were currently
operating.
Responding to the points raised by the signatories to the
call-in both the Head of Education and the Principal Manager – School Support
confirmed that:
·
Sport Wales had been consulted on the proposals
prior, during and following the pre-planning stage and they continued to
regularly correspond with the Council on the matter of the proposed new site
for Ysgol Plas Brondyffryn, as did Denbighshire Leisure Limited (DLL) and
third-party clubs/organisations which currently utilised the land and facilities
·
all these stakeholders were in continual
two-way dialogue with the Council with regards to the proposals
·
the pre-planning consultation events during
September and October 2022 had attracted a high number and diverse range of
consultees, which included residents, community groups etc. including Denbigh
Town Football Club and the local running club both of whom continued to be in
positive dialogue with the Council in relation to their future facilities,
which would be of a superior quality to what they had at present. A second pre-planning consultation was
currently being planned with a view to communicating to all stakeholders the
amendments to the plans resulting from the initial pre-planning consultation
and to provide an opportunity for all to submit further comments on the
proposed scheme. This second
pre-planning consultation would be undertaken over a four-week period.
·
the local Member Area Group (MAG) had been
involved in discussions on these projects at least ten times since 2020
·
the team involved with the work in compiling,
developing, and consulting with stakeholders was far wider than just the
Education Service. It included officers
from the Planning Service, Highways and Environmental Services, Safer Routes to
Schools etc. A ‘One Council’ approach
had been adopted in order to support the delivery of the projects in the SOP
·
the Council when proposing the development of a
new school or re-organising its education provision was required to undertake a
statutory consultation process, which entailed engaging with a
large number of statutory consultees.
The Monitoring Officer advised the Committee that Cabinet
in September 2023, when approving the preferred site for Ysgol Plas
Brondyffryn, explicitly stated “that the planning application must clearly
demonstrate that the loss of recreational space through the development on the
school playing field will be replaced by alternative outdoor provision which
would be of equivalent or greater community benefit”.
In response to questions raised by Committee members and
non-Committee members, the Lead Member, Corporate Directors, and officers from
various Council Services advised that:
·
the report submitted to Cabinet on 23 April
2024 outlined the Council’s high level strategic vision for capital investment
in its schools’ estate. The financial
details and risks identified for each individual project would be contained in
the business cases that would be presented to the CSG prior to submission to
Cabinet for approval. Each one of these
business cases could be examined by scrutiny at the pre-decision stage or
called-in for scrutiny following approval by Cabinet under the Council’s
Call-In Procedure Rules
·
the processes followed for submitting the SOP
and later individual business cases for these types of projects were quite
prescriptive and set out by the WG. The Authority
was therefore required to adhere with the process if it wished to bid for
government funding to deliver the projects
·
whilst the athletics field was protected from
development under policy BSC 11 within the current LDP, that protection only
extended insofar as development could be permitted through the planning process
if the Authority could demonstrate that it could provide alternative provision
for recreational/sports purposes which was of at least as good or of an
enhanced quality
·
that whilst DLL had raised questions in
relation to the proposed new site for Ysgol Plas Brondyffryn it had never
indicated that it opposed the proposals.
The land on which the proposed school facility would be built was owned
by the Education Service. This was
separate to the land that was currently leased by the Council to DLL for use by
the leisure centre, parking, and as an astroturf facility only. The land earmarked for the new school if it
proceeded did not form part of the lease agreement. The Council and DLL worked closely together
to manage and maintain the site.
·
details of the pre-planning consultations and
needs assessment already undertaken were already in the public domain and
assurances were given that details of future consultation exercises would also
be communicated to the public, with the results and comments fed into the
planning application process in due course
·
planning considerations did not form any part
of the Cabinet decision called-in for review.
However, specialist legal advice on planning matters relating to the
playing field site had already been shared with local elected members
·
officers from the Education and Planning
Services were currently working closely together to develop alternative green
space proposals, and in conjunction with Denbigh Town Football Club and the
Athletics Club they were attempting to design alternative, better quality
provision for the future which would also make the facilities available for
public use for greater periods of time than they were at present
·
delivery of none of the projects listed in the
SOP could be guaranteed one hundred per cent as they required to progress
through various stages of business case development before they could be
realised. However, the SOP represented
the Council’s vision, based on work undertaken to date, on what it wanted and
wished to see delivered within the nine-year timeframe, subject to the required
permissions being granted via the relevant decision-making processes
Councillor Arwel Roberts declared a personal interest in
his capacity as a local education authority (LEA) governor at Ysgol y Castell,
Rhuddlan and thanked the Lead Member and officers for including the Ysgol y
Castell scheme within the SOP. In his
view the Lead Member and officers had demonstrated that they had, and were
continuing, to extensively consult on the proposals that affected the Denbigh
area.
Councillor Kelly Clewett was of the view that the arguments
put forward during the meeting were not relevant to the decision taken by
Cabinet on 23 April, as a number of them related to
potential future decisions, not the one called-in for scrutiny at the current
meeting. She was therefore confident
that the decision taken by Cabinet on the SOP was the correct decision. Nevertheless, she emphasised the need for the
Council to continue to effectively consult with the wider community as the
projects progressed.
Councillor Elfed Williams requested that copies of the
consultation timetable to date and the reports produced following the various
consultations which had already taken place be circulated to county
councillors.
Prior
to drawing the discussion to a close both sides were given an opportunity to
summarise their viewpoints.
At the conclusion of a comprehensive discussion Councillor
Elfed Williams proposed that the Committee refer the decision back to Cabinet
with a recommendation that Cabinet when reconsidering its decision should be
content that the full consultation process had followed the Welsh Government
guidelines on removing a well-used sports field out of use and that Cabinet also
be requested to re-assess the needs and well-being assessment on available
green space/open space areas in Denbigh to ensure that they matched the
Council’s own expectations as stated in its Local Development Plan (LDP).
Councillor Williams’ proposal was seconded by Councillor
Bobby Feeley.
On being put to the vote the proposal was defeated and
therefore the Committee:
Resolved: that Cabinet’s decision of 23 April 2024
relating to the ‘Sustainable Communities for Learning – Rolling Programme’ be
upheld.
Supporting documents:
- Call-In Cover Report 160524, item 6. PDF 306 KB
- ANNEX A NOTICE OF CALL IN FORM FINAL, item 6. PDF 189 KB
- ANNEX B (complete), item 6. PDF 547 KB