Agenda item
PUBLIC CONVENIENCES SAVINGS PROPOSAL
To consider a report by the Corporate Director: Economy &
Environment (copy enclosed) which seeks
the Committee’s observations of
the report prior to any future Cabinet decision.
Minutes:
The Lead Member for
Environment and Transport along with the Corporate Director: Economy and
Environment introduced the report on Public Conveniences Savings Proposal
(previously circulated).
The Lead Member
reminded Members that this report formed part of the Council’s major savings
plan. The report was with regards to the potential transfer or closure of the
public toilets within Denbighshire.
The Corporate
Director: Economy and Environment continued by introducing Paul Jackson, Head of Highways
& Environmental Services and Hayley Jones, Principal Manager -
Catering & Cleaning.
The report presented provided
Members with the proposal to remove the budget from the pubic conveniences
function and in doing so withdraw from operating pubic conveniences in the
future. Members were reminded the proposal presented had always been included
in the major savings ideas for 2024/25 budget and discussed in the budget
workshops held over recent months. It had also been the subject of a specific
Member workshop on the 24th January 2024.
It was made clear to Members that no
formal decision had reached on this proposal. The proposal would be subject to
Cabinet decision, however as it has always formed part of the savings proposals
for 2024/25 there was a clear expectation that this saving would be delivered.
If the saving did not materialise, it would create an unplanned pressure for
the authority to source from alternative areas of the council.
The final decision would be made by
Cabinet, prior to the report being presented to Cabinet, Members heard
appropriate scrutiny and consultation had to take place. This included
corresponding with Members and City, Town and Community Councils to ascertain
if there was any appetite for the provision to be taken over by City, Town and
Community Councils.
Members heard there
were two types of public toilets in Denbighshire, brick building facilities or
pod facilities. The majority of the pod facilities were needing attention or
replacing which would also cost the authority money. It was therefore mainly
the toilet buildings that officers were looking at when discussing transfer of
ownership. All options would be discussed and considered.
Members heard the
intention was to relaunch the Community Toilet Scheme as a way of mitigating against
the impact of any public toilets that’s do have to close. Details of which were
included in the report.
It was stressed the
service was a non-statutory service that the authority did not have to provide.
The net budget taking income into consideration was around £270k. Members also
heard there was often an over spend on this budget due to number of different
reasons.
Responding to
members queries, officers advised that: –
·
City,
Town and Community Councils would be provided with information and facts and
figures including costing levels when options were discussed with officers.
Officers had been collating the data and information as it engaged with
councils and would present all the findings to Cabinet once collected.
·
Members
suggested that officers could look at alternative solutions such as keeping
certain conveniences open in areas of higher tourism such as Rhyl and
Llangollen.
·
It was
stressed that officers did not find the decision to propose the closure of
public conveniences easily. Numerous difficult decisions would have to be
reached in order to balance the budget.
·
A needs
analysis was currently being undertaken based on the population of every area
and visitor numbers to determine how many toilets would be sufficient. That
data would provide the information required to analyse how many Community
Toilet Scheme / businesses would be required in an area. There was currently
one business in Denbighshire that had signed up to the Community Toilet Scheme.
It was stressed that priority was ascertaining how many public toilets could be
transferred into the community.
·
Members
reiterated the need to have more information and facts/ data to discuss the
proposal in greater depth.
·
It was
highlighted that one of the Council’s core policy objectives was the promotion
of tourism to grow the regional economy. Tourism played a vital part in
Denbighshire’s economy with 6.03 million visitors in 2022. It was felt the
impact of closing toilets in tourist areas would have a negative impact on
businesses and the economy.
·
Members
heard the toilet situated in Market Street in Llangollen generated an income of
£171,396.61 in 2022/23 which equated to 43% of the total income from car parks
with public conveniences. The public toilets were an essential support of
tourism in the town.
·
If
portable toilets were required as part of an event, it was the responsibility
of the event organiser to make provision of such toilets available as part of
their event management.
·
Officers
stated there was no increase in reporting of street fouling during the covid
pandemic. There was no reported increase due to public toilets being closed
during the pandemic period.
·
The
plan for any toilet buildings that were closed would be bespoke to each
particular build, including any alternative uses. The short-term position for
many of the toilet buildings would be to lock the buildings up until a plan was
known.
·
The
Community Toilet Scheme was a Denbighshire County Council scheme which enabled
the authority to shape what that scheme looked like in the future. Officers
stated they could look into whether a City, Town or Community Council would be
eligible for the £500 compensation. The terms and conditions of the asset that
was transferred would have to be discussed during the transfer discussions. The
revised scheme would be brought back to scrutiny for discussion when the review
was completed.
·
Officers
had looked at all avenues of potential savings including part year savings and
reducing opening times. If that was a consideration it would reduce the amount
of savings that would be made by the service. Officers confirmed further detail
on the work explored would be included in the future report presented to
Scrutiny.
·
The
proposal formed part of the major savings proposal for the financial year
2024/25. It was already assumed prior to the additional ideas to balance the
budget. The service had put forward £250k saving to retain a small percentage
of the budget to remain for any ongoing costs.
·
Officers
advised it was yet unknown whether the potential closures would cause or create
any redundancies in the service, further detail and work would need to be
undertaken before that could be provided to Members.
·
It was
made clear that the toilets listed in appendix 3 did not generate any income.
They were a cost to the authority for opening and closing etc.
·
Discussions
with City, Town and Community Councils was due to commence imminently. The
communication had been delayed due to ensuring the procedure followed a legal
and proper course.
·
Members
shared their concerns on the level of detail within the report and stressed the
importance for further detail to be provided to Communities Scrutiny Committee
prior to a report to Cabinet.
·
Members
were informed the budget around public conveniences was £270k, the income
generated by toilets was around £70k per year which was reinvested back into
the service. The service often went over budget at around £30k per annum, thus
officers had to source that additional cost from other budget streams in the
service.
The Chair
summarised some of the points raised during the discussion. He stressed Members
requested a further report which provided the committee with greater detail
including facts and figures in relation to asset transfer, Community Toilet Scheme
information and suggestion of winter closure. It was reiterated that it was
important to have all the information available before a final decision could
be made. All Members were in agreement that a further report be presented to
Communities Scrutiny at a future meeting.
Councillor Karen
Edwards thanked Members and officers for the detailed discussion. She proposed
the following:
Proposed that a
further report be produced recognising that the budget for Public Conveniences
should not be removed in its entirety and would identify -
a) The take-up of
third-party management of toilets.
b) All costs of
accommodation work prior to transfer, or decommissioning, and redundancies.
c) The on-going
budget required to operate those toilets to be retained as essential tourist
infrastructure.
d) Revenue costs
for retained toilets to be supported by savings made in the Tourism marketing
budget and a review of the charges made for the use of Public Conveniences.
Councillor Brian
Jones proposed to accept the proposal stated by Councillor Edwards. Councillor
James Elson seconded the recommendation.
Members sought
clarity on what the Committee were being asked to vote on.
Councillor Alan
James proposed that a further report be presented to the committee with the
information as discussed during the debate to allow a deeper scrutiny of the
service with the requested information. Councillor Jon Harland seconded the
proposal.
Members of the
Communities Scrutiny Committee voted for the proposal suggested by Councillor
Alan James which resulted in a tied outcome. The Chair Councillor Huw Williams
had the casting vote and supported the proposal by Councillor Alan James that a
supplementary report be provided to the Communities Scrutiny Committee,
detailing all the points raised by Members during the meeting’s discussion. The
follow up report would be added to the forward work programme.
RESOLVED that
the Communities Scrutiny Committee note the content of the report and request a
further report providing greater detail on points raised during the discussion
be presented back to Communities Scrutiny Committee prior to the report to
Cabinet for decision.
Supporting documents:
- PCs report for Scrutiny Comittee, item 5. PDF 50 KB
- Appendix 1 - WBIA, item 5. PDF 94 KB
- Appendix 2 - PC Location List, item 5. PDF 214 KB
- Appendix 3 - PC Income Summary, item 5. PDF 50 KB