Agenda item
YSGOL PLAS BRONDYFFRYN PROJECT - SCHOOL ORGANISATION OBJECTION REPORT
To consider a report by Councillor Gill German, Deputy Leader and Lead Member for Education, Children and Families (copy enclosed) seeking Cabinet’s review of the Objection Report and whether or not to approve the proposal set out in the Statutory Notice to increase the capacity of Ysgol Plas Brondyffryn from 116 to 220.
Decision:
RESOLVED that Cabinet –
(a) reviewed the Objection
Report attached as Appendix 2 to the report;
(b) confirmed it was
satisfied that the statutory process as set out in the School Organisation Code had been followed;
(c) approves the proposal as
set out in the Statutory Notice with regard to increasing the capacity of Ysgol Plas Brondyffryn
from 116 to 220, and
(d) confirmed it had read,
understood and taken account of the Well-being Impact Assessment, as detailed
in Appendix 1 to the report, as part of its consideration, noting that the site
location for redevelopment had not been agreed or committed to by Cabinet or
Council.
Minutes:
Councillor Gill German presented the report seeking
Cabinet’s consideration of the objections received in response to the Statutory
Notice published by the Council on the proposal to increase Ysgol
Plas Brondyffryn’s capacity
from 116 to 220, and to consider whether or not to approve the proposal and
move forward with the project.
The project was part of Welsh Government’s Sustainable
Communities for Learning Programme (Band B) approved in September 2020. The school delivered specialist provision for
pupils with autism aged 3 – 19 on three separate sites and would move to a
brand new purpose built facility to accommodate the increase in capacity and
meet the needs of children on the autism spectrum. Given the specialist provision, Welsh
Government would fund 75% of the build and Denbighshire 25%.
The Head of Education Services added that the review of the
Objection Report was part of the legal process required before determination of
the Statutory Notice. The report
detailed two objections received which had focused on the location of the new
build rather than the increase in capacity together with the Council’s response
to those concerns. The school was
currently oversubscribed and there was a predicted increased demand going
forward. The proposal to increase
capacity would be subject to a site being agreed, planning consent approved,
funding being available and the new build being ready to accommodate the
increased capacity.
The Leader reiterated that the report referred to an
increase in the school’s capacity and not the location of any new build which
had been the focus of the objections.
Councillor Rhys Thomas raised concerns regarding
recommendation 3.4 as it referred to the Wellbeing Impact Assessment (WIA)
which referenced a specific site for the new build which had yet to be decided;
sought clarity around the recommendation in the Objection Report in so far as
it related to capacity only, and the separate process for site selection; and highlighted
confusion over the two processes given that no objections had been received
regarding the increase in capacity but had focused on the site of the new
build.
The Head of Education Services and Deputy
Monitoring Officer responded to the points raised, and other follow up
questions, as follows –
·
the WIA
had been based on the preferred site at the time and there was no presumption
it would be the site for the new build which had yet to be agreed; the
feasibility of another site was also under consideration and any site
identified would be subject to the appropriate processes. If a different site was identified the WIA
would need to be reviewed, and if a site outside Denbigh was proposed the whole
process would need to recommence
·
Cabinet
was required to take the WIA into account as part of its consideration, but did
not need to agree with all points; the WIA may not have focused sufficiently on
impacts of increasing capacity and there were elements focused on location. Consequently, Councillor Rhys Thomas proposed
an amendment to recommendation 3.4, seconded by Councillor Gwyneth Ellis, to
clarify that the actual site had not been agreed or committed to by the Cabinet
or Council
·
the
recommendation in the Objection Report referred to the proposal ‘To alter Ysgol Plas Brondyffryn
in Denbigh so that the capacity is increased from 116 to 220’ and recommended
the proposal be endorsed and permission given as part of Cabinet’s final
determination to progress to implementation stage, i.e. to issue the notice which
was subject to the other processes: a site being agreed, planning consent
approved, availability of funding and new build being ready. Two processes were running concurrently: (1)
to alter the school’s size and capacity, and (2) agreeing a site for the new
build and securing the necessary permissions and funding. The process for identifying a site would be
subject to a number steps, including discussion by the Modernising Education
Board and Denbigh Member Area Group (MAG) as part of that process
·
officers
thought they had been clear in all reports that there were two separate
processes but agreed there had been some confusion given the objections focused
on location rather than capacity.
Lessons would be learned from the process going forward. The Leader
suggested that objectors to the location may have just taken the opportunity to
raise those objections as part of that process which they were entitled to
do. Councillor Gill German advised that
there had been some consideration about whether to include objections based on
location, but on balance it was felt important that those views be heard,
despite not being relevant to the proposal in the Statutory Notice to increase
capacity.
Officers also responded to further questions
from members as follows –
·
with
regard to timescales the proposal was part of Band B which ran between 2019 and
2024. However, the Welsh Government had
recently acknowledged that many local authorities were in the position where
some of those projects may need to extend beyond 2024 and had recently
published guidance about how the programme would continue, effectively
providing a mechanism for local authorities who would not be able to commit
their resources during the initial timeframe and for those projects to be part
of a rolling programme going forward
·
agreed
that, whilst consultation had taken place with Denbigh MAG given the school’s
location, the school provided education for children across the county and
information on the project could be shared with all MAGs going forward
·
the
school’s capacity was 116 and was already oversubscribed with 136 pupils on
roll and 72 young people waiting for a health assessment; much work had been
undertaken to ensure the right size of the school to meet the need going
forward. In 2016 47% of pupils resided
out of county; as of January 2022 16% of pupils resided out of county, showing
an increase in Denbighshire pupils.
The Deputy Monitoring Officer reminded Cabinet
of the requirements of the School Organisation Code when determining the
proposal in a fair minded way which included a number of statutory
considerations. Councillor Gill German
felt it had been useful to make clear that the proposal related only to the
increase in capacity at the school and thanked members for their consideration
and contribution to the debate. Cabinet
had recognised the demand for specialist provision which continued to increase,
with the school currently oversubscribed, and the merits of the proposal to
increase the capacity to meet the needs of children going forward. If Cabinet was minded to approve the proposal
in the Statutory Notice and accept the recommendations, the project could
progress to the next stage in the process.
Upon
being put to the vote it was –
RESOLVED that Cabinet –
(a) reviewed the Objection Report
attached as Appendix 2 to the report;
(b) confirmed it was satisfied
that the statutory process as set out in the School Organisation
Code had been followed;
(c) approves the proposal as
set out in the Statutory Notice with regard to increasing the capacity of Ysgol Plas Brondyffryn
from 116 to 220, and
(d) confirmed it had read,
understood and taken account of the Well-being Impact Assessment, as detailed
in Appendix 1 to the report, as part of its consideration, noting that the site
location for redevelopment had not been agreed or committed to by Cabinet or
Council.
Supporting documents:
- YSGOL PLAS BRONDYFFRYN PROJECT, item 5. PDF 150 KB
- YSGOL PLAS BRONDYFFRYN - Appendix 1- WBIA, item 5. PDF 102 KB
- YSGOL PLAS BRONDYFFRYN - Appendix 2 Objection Report E, item 5. PDF 478 KB