Agenda item
APPLICATION FOR A PRIVATE HIRE VEHICLE LICENCE
To consider a confidential report by the Head of Planning, Public Protection and Countryside Services (copy enclosed) seeking members’ determination of an application for a Private Hire Vehicle Licence.
11.30 am
Decision:
RESOLVED that the application for a Private Hire
Vehicle Licence be granted subject to the additional conditions as detailed in
Appendix 3 to the report.
Minutes:
A confidential report by the Head of Planning,
Public Protection and Countryside Services (previously circulated) was
submitted upon –
(i)
an application having been received for a Private Hire Vehicle Licence;
(ii)
officers having not been in a position to grant the application as the
vehicle presented for licensing did not comply with the Council’s policy with
regard to the five-year age limit for vehicles licensed under a new
application;
(iii)
additional conditions being applicable to the licensing of specialist
vehicle types such as the one presented in this case together with supporting
evidence submitted by the Applicant, and
(iv)
the Applicant having been invited to attend the meeting in support of
the application and to answer members’ questions thereon.
The Applicant was in attendance and confirmed
he had received the report and committee procedures.
The Enforcement Officer (KB) summarised the
report and facts of the case.
The Applicant presented his case advising that
he was a long established operator of specialist vehicles with an unblemished
record and provided some background to the nature and operation of the
business. He elaborated on the proposed
vehicle for licensing (registered in 2008) and its merits which included high
standards and safety requirements and ongoing maintenance and service
schedules. He submitted that the age
policy had a disproportionate effect on the specialist nature of his business
and the vehicle under consideration was a type of luxury vehicle not normally
used for routine private hire work with less wear and tear. It was also
submitted that, in recognition of such specialist vehicle types, other councils
did not apply an age policy to vehicles of that nature.
The Applicant answered members’ questions
regarding the potential use and estimated mileage of the vehicle and provided
assurances with regard to future maintenance schedules and compliance testing,
and adherence to the proposed additional conditions for specialist vehicle
types. The Committee had previously
granted a licence for a comparable vehicle outside the age limit on a similar
basis. In his final statement the
Applicant advised that he was willing to comply with any licence conditions the
Committee considered appropriate for the vehicle in question.
The Committee adjourned to consider the
application and it was –
RESOLVED that the application for a Private Hire
Vehicle Licence be granted subject to the additional conditions as detailed in
Appendix 3 to the report.
The reasons for the
Licensing Committee’s decision were as follows –
Members had carefully
considered the application, officer’s report and the case put forward by the
Applicant both in writing in advance of the meeting and at the meeting itself.
In reaching their
decision, the Committee noted the nature and type of business operated and that
the Applicant was a reputable, long established operator of such specialist
services. On that basis, and having
considered specifically the specialist nature of the vehicle proposed to be
licensed, the intended use of the vehicle, and the strict bi-annual maintenance
service by Fleet Services, members agreed that a case had been made to deviate
from their age limit policy in this instance and grant the application as
applied for, subject to the additional conditions applicable to the specialist
vehicle type, as set out in Appendix 3 to the report.
The Committee’s
decision and reasons therefore were conveyed to the Applicant.
[As an aside, the Committee felt there may be
merit in introducing a separate policy in respect of specialist vehicle types,
and officers agreed that the matter could be subject to further consideration
as part of the future policy review going forward.]
At this juncture Councillor Gwyneth Ellis left the meeting.
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 9./1 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 9./2 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 9./3 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 9./4 is restricted
- Restricted enclosure View the reasons why document 9./5 is restricted