Agenda item
BUDGET 2022/23 - FINAL PROPOSALS
To consider a report by Councillor Julian Thompson-Hill, Lead Member for Finance, Performance and Strategic Assets (copy enclosed) setting out the implications of the Local Government Settlement 2022/23 and proposals to finalise the budget for 2022/23.
Decision:
RESOLVED that Cabinet –
(a) notes the impact of the Draft Local
Government Settlement 2022/23;
(b) supports the proposals outlined in
Appendix 1 to the report, and detailed in Section 4 of the report, and recommends
them to the full Council in order to finalise the budget for 2022/23;
(c) recommends to Council the average
Council Tax rise of 2.95% proposed;
(d) recommends to Council that authority is
delegated to the Head of Finance and Property in consultation with the Lead
Member for Finance to adjust the use of cash included in the budget proposals
by up to £500k if there is movement between the draft and final settlement
figures in order to allow the setting of Council Tax in a timely manner, and
(e) confirms that it has read, understood and
taken account of the Well-being Impact Assessment (Appendix 4 to the report).
Minutes:
Councillor
Julian Thompson-Hill presented the report setting out the implications of the
draft Local Government Settlement 2022/23 and proposals to finalise the budget
for 2022/23, including the level of Council Tax.
Councillor
Thompson-Hill provided an overview of the budget process and latest budget
position and elaborated on the proposals for consideration and recommendation
to full Council in order to set the budget for 2022/23. The draft settlement had resulted in a positive
settlement of 9.2% (compared to the Welsh average of 9.4%) with a final
settlement expected on 1 March 2022.
Within that figure Welsh Government had advised of some new
responsibilities, not all of which had clear funding consequentials
in the data, which had been set out in the report. Pressures amounting to £17.628m had been
detailed and the +9.2% settlement generated £15.005m leaving a funding gap of
£2.623m with proposals to bridge that gap identified in the report and further
explained at the meeting. A Council Tax
rise of 2.95% had been proposed to generate £1.869m additional revenue. Due to the lateness of the final settlement
it was recommended that authority be delegated to enable cash adjustments
included in the budget proposals of up to £500k. It was noted that the draft settlement had
also included indicative average settlement increases of 3.5% for 2023/24 and
2.4% for 2024/45. Finally reference was
made to the extensive consultation on the budget process and involvement of all
political groups in that regard including the submission of pressures/savings
put forward.
The
Head of Finance added that, whilst it was an unusually high settlement, it had
included extra responsibilities and he reported on the funding assessments of
those new elements and work with the Welsh Local Government Association and
S.151 Officers in that regard and subsequent funding assumptions. In terms of Council Tax increases current
indications across Wales ranged from 2.95% – 4.95%.
Cabinet
discussed the budget proposals and debate focused on the following –
·
at
the request of Councillor Brian Jones for the benefit of residents, the Lead
Member detailed the consultation carried out on the budget process and
explained the acronyms used, demonstrating the involvement of all senior
officers and elected members in that process together with schools and trade
unions. All elected members had been
given the opportunity to input into the process and additional meetings with
Political Group Leaders seeking the submission of pressures/savings had also
been carried out. Pressures/savings put
forward by the political groups had been addressed at the council budget
workshop in December to which all elected members had been invited
·
Councillor Bobby Feeley was pleased to note
that both the Council’s social care and the private sector social care sector
would be paid the Real Living Wage which she felt was an important first
step. However, despite the increase
there was still some way to go to ensure social care workers were paid a decent
and deserving wage for the work undertaken and there was an acute recruitment
crisis in social care services which put additional pressure on existing staff
·
in
response to a question from Councillor Mark Young regarding implementation of
the Real Living Wage payments to social care staff, the Corporate Director:
Communities acknowledged the complexities involved in that work and advised
that meetings would commence shortly with colleagues and partners to determine
how best to progress that work going forward.
Assurances were provided that the Council had been involved from the
outset and was well placed to progress that work, particularly given that
Denbighshire hosted the Regional Collaborative Team and work on the national
workforce programme was led by the Social Services Director at Conwy County
Borough Council.
The
Leader thanked the Lead Member and Head of Finance for the informative and
clear report. He also welcomed the
inclusion of an indicative settlement for 2023/24 and 2024/25 which would aid
future budget planning. However, it was
clear that there would be pressure on future budgets in light of the indicative
settlements and he believed that raising the Council Tax level as proposed at
this stage would provide a stronger base for future budget setting going
forward.
The
Lead Member and Head of Finance responded to further questions from non-Cabinet
members as follows –
·
the difference in Council Tax raised by
increasing the proposal from 2.95% to 3.00% would be £29k per annum, 72p per
week on a Band D property
·
the terminology ‘Fire Service Charge’ was
correct as legally it was a levy; the Fire Service set its budget and local
authorities had to pay their element of that
·
there was a mixed picture in terms of future
grants and some uncertainties in that regard, particularly in terms of
education and capital grants, but the situation would become clearer leading up
to the new financial year and new Council
·
the issue of future savings had been
considered during the last round of service challenge meetings in order to
identify large projects to generate savings; the potential disposal of assets
would form part of the new ways of working programme and market conditions
would also need to be taken into account
·
examples were provided as to how the amount
to be spend on new responsibilities could be calculated with at least £5.5m to
be allocated to those elements from the 9.2% positive settlement
·
the reasoning behind the absence of future
years figures in the proposed budget relating to waste services was explained
with the inclusion of the previous year’s figures as a specific strategic
pressure which had since been addressed; future years figures would be updated
taking into account the indicative settlement over the coming months and taken
through the usual democratic processes.
RESOLVED that Cabinet –
(a) notes the
impact of the Draft Local Government Settlement 2022/23;
(b) supports the
proposals outlined in Appendix 1 to the report, and detailed in Section 4 of the
report, and recommends them to the full Council in order to finalise the budget
for 2022/23;
(c) recommends to
Council the average Council Tax rise of 2.95% proposed;
(d) recommends to Council that authority is
delegated to the Head of Finance and Property in consultation with the Lead
Member for Finance to adjust the use of cash included in the budget proposals
by up to £500k if there is movement between the draft and final settlement
figures in order to allow the setting of Council Tax in a timely manner, and
(e) confirms that it
has read, understood and taken account of the Well-being Impact Assessment
(Appendix 4 to the report).
Supporting documents:
- BUDGET FINAL PROPOSALS, item 9. PDF 181 KB
- BUDGET FINAL PROPOSALS - App 1 MTFP, item 9. PDF 202 KB
- BUDGET FINAL PROPOSALS - App 2 Service Pressures and Savings, item 9. PDF 189 KB
- BUDGET FINAL PROPOSALS - App 3 Council Tax Sensitivity, item 9. PDF 362 KB
- BUDGET FINAL PROPOSALS - App 4 Wellbeing Impact Assessment, item 9. PDF 101 KB