Agenda item
ESTYN ADULT COMMUNITY EDUCATION INSPECTION
To consider a
report by the School Effectiveness Performance Officer: Secondary (copy
enclosed) which details the findings of the Estyn
Inspection of the Conwy and Denbighshire Adult Community Education Partnership
and seeks the Committee’s observations on the Inspectors’ recommendations.
9.45 a.m.
Minutes:
A
copy of a report by
the School Effectiveness Performance Officer:
Secondary had been circulated with the papers for the meeting.
The School Effectiveness
Performance Officer: Secondary provided
a summary of the report which detailed the findings of the Estyn
Inspection of the Conwy and Denbighshire Adult Community Education Partnership
(Cyswllt
Dysgu). The
salient points outlined in the report included:-
·
Estyn had aimed to answer the three following key questions
through an analysis of self-evaluation, performance data, lesson observations
and meetings with stakeholders:
(i) How good are the outcomes
(ii) How good is provision
(iii) How good are leadership and management
·
Judgement on all three questions had been good. An overall judgement on the partnership’s
current performance had been considered to be good with the prospects for
improvement being excellent.
·
The Estyn
Inspection report had highlighted the levels of ability achieved from learners
from different backgrounds and age groups.
·
Not enough Welsh speaking learners
had utilised their Welsh language skills well enough as a medium for learning
or for assessing their progress.
·
Most learners improved their
confidence through learning and as a result were better able to manage their
lives and support their children.
·
Teaching had been good or better in
most of the sessions observed by the inspection team.
The
Partnership’s Leadership had provided good leadership with Leaders
collaborating well with a broad range of other key Groups. The partnership had good arrangements for
self-assessment, with clear objectives and timescales and Estyn
had considered that partnership working had been excellent with improved
standards being achieved by learners, an improvement in the quality of teaching
and in assessment.
The Committee noted Estyn’s
recommendations that, in order to further improve the partnership would
need to:-
(i)
increase
the number of classes and learning activities in which learners achieve
excellent standards in their work.
(ii)
increase the amount of excellent teaching and assessment.
(iii)
promote
a common approach to safeguarding to raise the standard of all partnership
members’ policies and procedures, and
(iv)
promote and improve the use of Welsh as a medium of
communication for learning.
In
reply to a question from Ms G. Greenland regarding the monitoring of the
collaboration process between Authorities, the School Effectiveness Performance Officer: Secondary explained
that the Partnership’s Executive Group would receive reports from the
Sub-Groups. The Local Authority would
monitor progress, the quality of courses and student numbers through Services
Level Agreements and Service Groups based at the Colleges.
Councillor
W. Mullen-James referred to paragraph 4.6 of the reportwhich
highlighted that not enough Welsh speaking learners use their Welsh language
skills well enough as a medium for learning or assessing their progress. The School Effectiveness Performance Officer: Secondary
expressed the view that there was a need to offer more Welsh medium courses
across the Partnership. He also explained
that in many cases there was a confidence issue with many students choosing to
learn through the medium of English. In
reply to a question from Councillor H.O. Williams, it was explained that it
would be difficult to monitor the number of Welsh speaking students attending
University outside the locality.
Councillor
J.M. Davies referred to Estyn’s expectations that the
outcomes from the report, which were good, should be transformed into being
excellent and questioned how this could be achieved. The School Effectiveness Performance Officer: Secondary
explained that Estyn only provide a judgement and would not offer
guidance or direction with regard to achieving further improvement. It would be up to the Partnership itself to
determine how it would strive to improve further.
The
School
Effectiveness Performance Officer: Secondary responded to a
question from Councillor T.R. Hughes and explained that the merging of
The
Chair suggested that, in order to progress the improvements already attained,
it would be useful if scrutiny saw the action plan detailing the measures and
timescales to achieve the improvement from good to excellent. Following further discussion, it was:-
RESOLVED – that the Communities Scrutiny Committee receive the report and note
Members comments.
At this juncture as the meeting was progressing ahead of
schedule the Chair, with the Committee’s consent, varied the order of business.
Supporting documents: