Agenda item
9 FEBRUARY 2020 FLOOD EVENT - SECTION 19 FLOOD INVESTIGATION REPORT
To consider a report by the Flood Risk Engineer, Wayne Hope, into the investigation of the flooding on 9th February 2020 (copy attached).
Minutes:
The
Lead Member for Waste, Transport and the Environment, Councillor Brian Jones,
introduced the 9 February 2020 Flood Event - Section 19 Flood Investigation
Report.
On the 9th of February 2020,
extensive flooding occurred across Denbighshire as a result of Storm
Ciara. Council officers, as well as
officers from Natural Resources Wales (NRW) and Dŵr
Cymru Welsh Water, had since carried out
investigations into the flooding to understand the reason why the flooding
occurred, the likelihood of it happening again and to assess whether measures
could be put in place to reduce flooding in
future.
Keith Ivens of NRW commenced
with the queries raised regarding St. Asaph.
He confirmed that the event in February 2020 had been an extreme
event. The new defences were
constructed, built and designed on a 1 in 100 year
standard of protection including allowance for climate change. What had been seen in the event analysis in
Appendix B was a hydrological analysis of occurrences due to Storm Ciara.
Storm Ciara was estimated to
be a 1 in 250 / 1 in 300 year event at peak flow.
Immediately after the event it had been queried why there had been overtopping
in one particular location. Extensive
discussions had taken place with the designers, and an extensive post event
modelling carried out with the designers to understand what happened in that
location. It had been resolved with the
designers which had led to the works which were currently being carried out in
St. Asaph. The community of St. Asaph
had very good protection and 370 properties had been protected which would have
been flooded otherwise.
Failure of water level recorder in St. Asaph under the A55. The type of equipment installed at that
location was a pressure transducer which was set with an upper and lower limit,
but it had exceeded the upper limit. The pressure transducer was still in place
but an additional downward facing ultrasonic level sensor was now situated on
the new Spring Gardens Bridge which allowed NRW to monitor water levels and
that fed into the flood forecasting model for the River Elwy
Protection of rural communities - Wigfair and
Lower Denbigh Road area had been looked at as part of the St. Asaph scheme to
ascertain if some of the properties along that area could be included within
the scheme. At that point it had been
decided it would not be possible to include the properties, as it would make
the scheme uneconomical and therefore, could not take that forward. A number of the properties were offered and provided with
property level protection.
There was a question mark around reviewing flood map outlines around
those areas. Over the last 12/18 months
NRW had been working with Welsh Government to review, update and replace the
old flood maps that were available and new flood maps called Flood Risk
Assessment Wales were released earlier this year which looked at all the
flooding from surface water, river flooding, none main river flooding all in
one location.
Property level protection was in the NRW 1-5 year
recommendation. There had been a
property level protection pilot running in Llanfair TH. Results of the pilot would be assessed and
would then look at other small and rural communities which would not benefit
from a larger scheme and also look at other alternatives with property level
protection being one of those.
Inevitably it was always difficult in smaller more rural communities to
achieve the cost benefits to address and design a larger scheme which was why
NRW assessed alternative options. NRW
looked at trying to achieve the greatest level of protection for the greatest
number of properties as possible.
The question raised regarding a valve in St. Asaph being opened – it
was not actually a valve, it was a flap which had lifted and held in place so
it was a gravity fed flap which required the pressure of water behind it to
push it open. The inspection regime had
been increased around that to ensure that during and after events it was
working as it should be.
Councillor Peter Scott had sent an enquiry in to NRW regarding Glan Llyn Farm. Officers from NRW had visited Glan Llyn Farm where discussions
had taken place regarding their plans which were very positive but,
unfortunately, currently the window for NFM (Natural Flood Management) funding
was closed so no grant funding would be available at the current time. A full response would be provided to
Councillor Peter Scott.
Councillor Arwel Roberts had raised the risk in Rhuddlan. The Risk in Rhuddlan
formed part of the Dee and Clwyd Strategy and there was an increasing risk due
to climate change. In Rhuddlan there was a dual risk of tidal and fluvial
flooding. A review had been carried out
approximately two years ago but NRW were satisfied that currently everything
from a tidal perspective was as it should be.
NRW recognised there was an increase in storms and increase in fluvial
flows and that piece of work would have been considered as part of the
additional work in St. Asaph. A full
response would be provided to Councillor Arwel Roberts.
Regarding insurance, it had been recognised that those properties
affected by flooding did have either increased premiums or larger amount they
have to pay out before the insurance would provide additional funding. NRW advised that if residents were living in
a flood risk area and had been affected by flooding then they should have
discussions with the insurance companies but also contact the National Flood
Forum who were a National Charity. The
National Flood Forum would be able to provide independent advice but there was
also the Flood Re Scheme which could help to provide advice for people having
difficulties regarding insurance. It was
up to an individual insurer if they chose to insure a property and they would consider
the risk associated with it. The
insurers would not necessarily look at NRW flood maps and would make the
decision themselves. NRW were not
involved with how insurers determined their premiums.
Issues in Llanynys was within the medium term
recommendation list which would be addressed between 1 – 5 years. It had been very challenging as flooding had
taken place on 9 February 2020 and then the country had been put into lockdown
in March 2020. Many people were working
from home, home schooling and it had to be considered it was not an excuse but
had to consider all the recommendations and the work which had been
achieved. It continued to be a challenge
and NRW were also seeing challenges around contractors, suppliers providing
information and getting information from consultants etc., who were also in
lockdown. It had also been very
difficult getting surveyors out on site.
NRW were following Welsh Government guidelines which, obviously had a
lot of restrictions, how they were operating and as well as protecting staff
needed to protect the community also.
More work needed to be carried out in Llanynys
as that issue had not been addressed and it was on the medium term list but a
full response would be provided to Councillor Merfyn Parry.
Flood Risk Activity Permits were in place for any works on a main river
or within seven metres of the river bank.
Any structure that needed to go over or under the main river required a
Flood Risk Activity Permit and assess what impact it had on flood risk
elsewhere but also in terms of the environmental impact eg:
fisheries, biodiversity, ecology etc., of the river system. There was a process for a permit application
and if anyone worked on main rivers they would need to apply to NRW for that
permit. If they were working on none
main river then that permit would be issued through
the Local Authority. A legal process
needed to be followed to obtain a permit.
Flood Risk across the county was a concern for both the Local Authority
and NRW but the National Flood Management Project looked at the catchment
(Clwyd catchment included the Rivers Clwyd, Elwy and Dee). NRW were looking at ways flow could be held
back in the catchment which could have some benefit to the communities
downstream. NRW were pro-active but had
to bear in mind with the impact of climate change, things seemed to be getting
worse not better, so there was only so much which could be done to counteract
nature.
Keith Ivens confirmed NRW had programmes, medium and long term plans
which were 5-10 years ahead looking at a number of defences, existing schemes
and looking at the current standard of protection. With the latest climate change projections,
NRW were reviewing those to ascertain if they were still fit for purpose for
now and in the future. Where any
improvement works or upgrades were taking place, the impact of climate change
would be considered as part of that, and the predicted increases in flows and
levels would also be factored into the work.
The Chief Executive confirmed the responsibility to flooding was an
emergency planning issue. A report would
be presented to all Members once amendments were made to existing
practices. The Chief Executive would
brief the Lead Member for Emergency Planning, Councillor Mark Young, imminently
whereupon a decision would be made how to take that forward in terms of
engaging with the wider membership.
The Local Authority were in the process of constructing another coastal
defence scheme to address the risk of flooding in future in Prestatyn and Rhyl.
Keith
Ivens was thanked for attending and responding to questions put forward by
Members.
Proposed
by Councillor Brian Jones, seconded by Councillor Peter Scott to accept the
report.
A
vote took place and it was unanimously agreed to accept the report.
RESOLVED that:
(i)
Members
consider the flood investigation report and provide feedback and comments.
(ii)
The
Council seeks assurance from Natural Resources Wales that the recommendations
identified in Natural Resources Wales’ flood investigation reports will be
carried out
Supporting documents:
- Feb 2020 Flood Investigation Report, item 5. PDF 147 KB
- Feb 2020 Flood Investigation Report 010721 - App 1, item 5. PDF 312 KB
- Feb 2020 Flood Investigation Report 010721 Appendix A, item 5. PDF 990 KB
- Feb 2020 Flood Investigation Report 010721 Appendix B, item 5. PDF 23 MB
- Feb 2020 Flood Investigation Report 010721 Appendix C, item 5. PDF 2 MB
- Feb 2020 Flood Investigation Report 010721 Appendix D, item 5. PDF 2 MB