Agenda item
COMMUNITY SAFETY PARTNERSHIP ANNUAL UPDATE FOR 2017-2018
To consider a report by the Community Safety Manager (copy attached) to inform members of the activity of the Joint Community Safety Partnership (CSP) in 2017-2018 and the Local/Regional action plan for 2018/2019.
(11.10 A.M. – 11.55 A.M.)
Minutes:
The Chair welcomed Sian
Taylor (Community Safety Partnership Manager) to the meeting.
The Lead Member for
Corporate Standards introduced the Community Safety Manager’s report and
appendices (previously circulated) which presented the Committee with the
Community Safety Partnership’s (CSP) Annual Update for 2017-2018. During
his introduction the Lead Member informed the Committee that the North Wales
Safer Communities Board (NWSCB) was responsible for agreeing the priorities for
the region and drawing up an action plan for each CSP to deliver. The
delivery of these plans was regularly monitored by the NWSCB, with the local
CSP analysing its performance in delivering the plan for its area and devising
local solution to local problems.
The CSP Manager
advised that 2017-18 had been a challenging year financially for the CSP
locally, and its performance in delivering its action plan in the Denbighshire
area had been good overall.
Responding to
members’ questions the Lead Member, Corporate Director: Economy and
Public Realm and the CSP Manager:
·
agreed
that whilst the wording for Priority 1 for 2017-18 ‘Reduce Crime and Disorder
in the Area’ seemed to outline the whole purpose of the CSP, it was important
to focus on the prioritised actions identified in a bid to realise this ambition
for that particular year. Reducing crime and disorder would always be the
CSP’s ambition and its ultimate aspiration;
·
advised that reducing the number of domestic
violence incidents was a CSP priority, as well as a priority for the WG and the
Police and Crime Commissioner for North Wales. It also featured in the
Council’s Corporate Plan as part of the Resilient Communities corporate
priority. It was important to bear in mind that for crimes to be
investigated it was essential for them to be reported. The success of
efforts made to encourage people to report incidents of crime did have a
negative impact on the statistics with the number of incidents reported being
higher in a number of areas. However, whilst this did seem perverse it did
assist officers to identify patterns or trends and try to devise potential
solutions to address the root of the problems and mitigate against any further
increases in future;
·
advised
that Barnardo’s had undertaken a lot of work in relation to educating people,
particularly young people on what was and was not acceptable in a relationship,
with a view to reducing domestic violence;
·
advised that the Regional Domestic Abuse
Strategy was available for members to read on the Council’s website. All
Council staff had undertaken an on-line training module on domestic violence
and it was hoped to roll-out this module to elected members in the new year. Over 200 people had attended an event at
Rhyl Town Hall aimed at raising awareness of domestic abuse in its various
guises and how those affected could seek support and help. All domestic
abuse services were in attendance as well as the Citizen Advice Bureau
(CAB). The CSP was keen to arrange similar events in future but at
present did not have the capacity to hold them on a regular basis. One
potential method for future awareness raising events may be by having a
presence at conferences/events organised by partner organisations i.e. North
Wales Fire and Rescue Service, North Wales Police etc.;
·
agreed
to provide members with details of the statistical information which
accompanied the 2017-18 annual performance report;
·
confirmed that advice had been
shared with residents on how to deal with telephone scams etc. at multi-agency
community engagement events held and via social media. The Police were
well aware of the problems and anxiety caused by such scams, particularly to
vulnerable individuals. Such scams also tied-up valuable Police
resources;
·
acknowledged
that the non-emergency Police telephone number, 101, was experiencing problems
and that the Police were aware of the matter;
·
advised
that a multi-agency approach was being used in a bid to reduce various types of
crimes i.e. young people using bicycles irresponsibly and endangering
themselves and others, reoffending, substance misuse etc.;
·
advised that the ‘county lines’ drug
operations and modern day slavery were extremely complex areas which required
specialist Police personnel to investigate and address. These complex
investigations were extremely time consuming. The CSP and its partner
organisations focussed their resources more on prevention work with children,
young people and vulnerable groups in a bid to raise their awareness of the
dangers of getting involved with illegal substances. CSP and Safeguarding
officers worked closely in a bid to protect the vulnerable from the
perpetrators of these crimes, as drug-users themselves were victims of the drug
dealers crimes;
·
confirmed
that statements made in recent months by the Police and Crime Commissioner and
the Chief Constable in relation to drug use in the area had not in any way
hindered the CSP’s work;
·
advised that the CSP was actively working
with local authority trading standards departments in relation to raising the
public’s awareness and their responsibility to purchase quality goods with a
view to reducing opportunities for individuals to exploit vulnerable people
through modern day slavery practices to produce sub-standard goods at very low
prices. The poor quality of some of these goods could potentially pose a
health and safety risk to the purchaser or whoever received them;
·
gave an overview of how safeguarding
procedures would be instigated if concerns were drawn to a CSP partner’s
attention about the safety of a vulnerable person. Similarly if it became
apparent that a looked after child (LAC) was at risk of any harm all CSP
Safeguarding Leads would be alerted and a
multi-agency response would be initiated. This would involve all relevant
agencies i.e. Police, Social Services, Education, Health, Foster parents etc.;
·
acknowledged that safeguarding
and protecting a child from harm was far easier during school hours than
outside school hours. Nevertheless the Council could not afford to be
complacent in this area and had acknowledged the need to continually improve
its safeguarding work despite budgetary pressures. The Corporate
Parenting Forum had an important role to play in safeguarding matters.
Members referred to an excellent presentation on Safeguarding given to the
Corporate Parenting Forum and asked that it be shown to all members in the near
future;
·
advised
that the CSP did work closely with schools in a bid to identify pupils who were
at risk of getting involved in anti-social behaviour etc., with a view to
providing proactive intervention work to steer them away from entering the
criminal justice system;
·
confirmed
that the restorative justice approach applied by the Police, courts and Youth
Justice Service (YJS) had the potential to pay dividends for the individual as
well as society in general; and
·
confirmed that the Police had
requested a meeting with the CSP with a view to addressing the nuisance caused
by individuals begging in public places. It was anticipated that CSP
agencies could focus their efforts to raise public awareness of how to respond
to people begging and to support those individuals who were currently begging
to access services that would help them become financially independent, whilst
releasing the Police to focus on those individuals who displayed aggressive
begging tendencies or were acting in a fraudulent capacity;
Members
acknowledged the complexities involved with the ‘county lines’ illegal
substance misuse work and the resources the Police etc. had to devote to
it. Nevertheless, they felt that it was very difficult for them to
explain to residents that the drug-users who were causing a problem in the
communities were themselves victims.
At the conclusion
of the discussion the Committee:
Resolved: - subject to the above observations and the
provision of the requested information to receive and acknowledge the contents
of the Community Safety Partnership’s performance report for 2017-18 and its Project/Partnership Activity Plan for 2018-19
Supporting documents:
- CSP's Annual Report 2017-18 201218, item 6. PDF 133 KB
- CSP's Annual Report 2017-18 201218 - App 1, item 6. PDF 354 KB
- CSP's Annual Report 2017-18 201218 - App 2, item 6. PDF 493 KB