Agenda item
CORPORATE RISK REGISTER
To consider the latest version of the Council’s Corporate Risk Register.
10.05am – 10.45am
Minutes:
The Lead Member for Finance, Performance and Assets introduced the Planning and Performance Officer’s report (previously circulated) which presented the Committee with a copy of the Council’s Corporate Risk Register and a narrative on the proposed deletions, additions and amendments to the Register.
During his introduction the Lead Member outlined the review
process for the Register and gave a definition of the terms ‘Inherent Risk’ and
‘Residual Risk’. The Corporate Risk Register contained the high-level
risks identified by the Council, lower level risks were included in Service
Risk Registers. The Corporate Risk
Register could be updated at any time but is formally reviewed every six months
and Service Risk Registers are reviewed on a quarterly basis.
Risks could be escalated from Service Risk Registers to the Corporate Risk Register if necessary, conversely Corporate Risks could be downgraded to Service Risks and entered into the relevant Service’s Risk Register.
The Lead Member also advised that Appendix 1 to the report
had been reformatted at the Committee’s request, to enable members to easily
identify which ‘risks’ were new, had changed, been removed or had not been
subject to any changes.
Members’ attention was drawn to two new ‘risks’ which had been added to the Register as part of the recent review:
·
Risk
number 00036: the risk that any negative impacts of leaving the European
Union cannot be mitigated by the Council – this risk had been added as the
impact of the United Kingdom’s (UK) exit from the European Union (EU) was still
unclear. Due to the current uncertainties surrounding this specific matter, both the ‘inherent’ and ‘residual’ risks had
been classified as B1 (red).
·
Risk
number 00037: the risk that partners do not have the resources, matching
priorities or commitment to support the delivery of shared plans and
priorities. This risk had an ‘inherent risk’ classification of B1(red) and a
‘residual risk’ classification of C2(amber) due to the fact that collaborative
boards were attended by senior management and collaborative plans and
priorities (e.g. the Public Service Board’s Well-being Plan) had been developed
to reflect broader public sector priorities (Denbighshire County Council’s
Corporate Plan, for instance).
Responding to
members’ questions the Lead member and Planning and Performance Officer:
·
advised
that both the ‘inherent’ and ‘residual’ risk classification for 00035 relating
to the Regional Growth Deal were classified at C1 (red) at present. This
was because the details of the Deal were still being compiled. When more
specific details on the Deal were available the risk scores would be reviewed
based on the new information;
·
confirmed
that the preparatory work the Council had undertaken in relation to the
potential impact the introduction of Universal Credit (UC) in Denbighshire
could have on residents and the Council (risk number 00016) had been very
successful. Consequently the ‘Inherent Risk’ classification of B2 (red) had
been reduced to a ‘Residual Risk’ classification of D3 (Yellow).
Communities Scrutiny Committee had examined this work in detail earlier
in the summer. This ‘corporate risk’ could potentially reduce even
further and be transferred to the Service Risk Register to be managed by the
Service in future;
·
advised
that whilst ‘risks’ could potentially change at any time and that the Register
would be amended to reflect this at the time, a formal review of the Corporate
Risk Register in its entirety was undertaken by the Corporate Executive Team
(CET) every six months.
If a risk was downgraded to a Service Risk or removed completely it did
not mean that it could not be re-entered on to the Corporate Risk Register at a
later date if circumstances necessitated its inclusion;
·
advised
that with respect of risks 00033 and 00034 - the risk that the cost of care
outstrips the Council’s resources and that demand for specialist care could not
be met locally – more money had been set-aside for social care services,
particularly specialist services. However demand for such services were
difficult to predict and could fluctuate.
In addition the Health Services could at times have responsibilities in
relation to the funding of specialist care. With a view to mitigating
against the risks in this particular area reserves had been set-aside to help
support the Council during times of peak demand for expensive specialist
services. It was highly unlikely that either of these two risks would be
removed from the Corporate Risk Register in the foreseeable future;
·
advised
that whilst the UK Treasury had guaranteed certain funding to replace EU
funding that would be lost, this guarantee was time limited and no details were
available yet on long-term funding. The WG had also committed to replace
some EU funding, but details were not yet available on:
o
what
type of funding would be available;
o
whether
it would replace lost EU monies with like for like; or
o
if
it would be available across Wales or confined to certain geographic
areas.
Whilst a commitment had been made that funding already guaranteed would
be honoured to ensure that all projects were delivered as originally planned,
no undertakings had been received to date with regards to funding that may be
available for future projects;
·
informed
the Committee that a piece of work had been started during the year on
compiling a register of community risks e.g. climate change, Welsh Language
etc. The information gleaned from this exercise had been used for
informing the Well-being Needs Assessment and for assessing any potential impact
on communities entailed with the risks identified;
·
advised
that risk number 00011 related to the Council’s ability to respond to a
‘one-off’ event i.e. similar to the Grenfell Tower disaster. The
‘residual risk’ score for this risk was E2 (yellow) due to the availability of
assistance via the North Wales Regional Emergency Planning (NWREP) Service and
the North Wales Resilience Forum (NWRF).
Dependent upon the nature of the incident these organisations would
appoint a ‘lead’ organisation to co-ordinate a response i.e. Police, Fire &
Rescue etc. The Scrutiny Chairs and Vice-Chairs Group had already
requested a report on agencies’ response to the recent fire on Llantysilio Mountain; and
·
confirmed
that with respect of risk number 00021 relating to effective partnerships and
interfaces between the Health Board and the Council being developed, whilst
both organisations worked closely together there would always be challenges in
this area.
Prior to drawing
the discussion to a close members requested that future reports include a copy
of the ‘Risk Matrix’ with the report to enable them to analyse the ‘inherent’
and ‘residual’ risk determinations and that they be provided with a copy of the
‘Guide to Risk Management’ document. Members also emphasised the importance
of all Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks, especially those required
for school-based staff, to be kept current and up to date.
Following a
detailed discussion the Committee:
Resolved: - subject to the above observations –
(i)
to note the proposed deletions, additions and
amendments to the Corporate Risk Register (Appendix 1): and
(ii)
to recommend that the Corporate Risk Register,
along with Performance Scrutiny Committee’s observations, be presented to
Cabinet Briefing at its meeting on 15 October for discussion.
Supporting documents:
- Corporate Risk Register Report 270918, item 5. PDF 148 KB
- Corporate Risk Register Report - Appendix 1 270918, item 5. PDF 497 KB
- Corporate Risk Register Report 270918 - Appendix 2, item 5. PDF 4 MB