Agenda, decisions and draft minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, County Hall, Ruthin
Media
Webcast: View the webcast
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES Additional documents: Decision: There were no apologies. Minutes: There were no apologies. |
|
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS PDF 115 KB Members to declare any personal or prejudicial interests in any business identified to be considered at this meeting. Additional documents: Decision: No declarations of interest had been raised. Minutes: No declarations of interest had been raised. |
|
URGENT MATTERS Notice of
items which, in the opinion of the Chair, should be considered at the meeting
as a matter of urgency pursuant to Section 100B(4) of the
Local Government Act 1972. Additional documents: Decision: No urgent matters had been raised. Minutes: No urgent matters had been raised. |
|
A GROWTH DEAL FOR THE ECONOMY OF NORTH WALES: PROPOSITION DOCUMENT PDF 119 KB To consider a report by Councillor Hugh Evans, Leader and Lead Member for the Economy and Corporate Governance (copy enclosed) seeking Cabinet’s endorsement of the Proposition Document for recommendation to Council for adoption and authorisation for the Leader to commit the Council, alongside its partners, to entering Heads of Terms agreement with the UK and Welsh governments. Additional documents:
Decision: RESOLVED that – (a) Cabinet endorse the Proposition Document
for recommendation to Council for adoption as (1) the basis of a longer-term
regional strategy for economic growth and (2) the regional bid for the priority
programmes and projects from which the content of a Growth Deal will be drawn
at the Heads of Terms Agreement stage with Governments. Adoption does not commit the Council to any
financial investment of its own at this stage and is subject to the financial
risks and benefits of the final Growth Deal being set out in detail, for full
consideration, when the final Deal is presented for approval at a later date,
and (b) that the Leader be authorised to commit
the Council to entering Heads of Terms with Governments alongside the political
and professional leaders from the nine other statutory partners represented on
the North Wales Economic Ambition Board, and the North Wales Mersey Dee
Business Council, with the Proposition Document setting out the parameters for
the Heads of Terms agreement. Minutes: Councillor
Hugh Evans introduced the report seeking Cabinet’s endorsement of the
Proposition Document for recommendation to Council for adoption and
authorisation for the Leader to commit the Council, alongside its partners, to
entering Heads of Terms agreement with the UK and Welsh governments. He explained the need to consider the report
at an earlier stage than planned in order that the Chancellor could include
reference to the Growth Bid in the Autumn Statement on 29 October 2018. Some
background information was provided regarding previous collaborative approvals
to adopt the Growth Vision and develop a Growth Deal Bid for the region. The Proposition Document set out the priority
programmes for activity and projects to be considered for inclusion in the
Growth Deal at the Heads of Terms stage and required approval from all six
North Wales local authorities as the next stage within the process. It was stressed that adoption did not commit
the Council to any financial investment of its own at this stage and was
subject to the financial risks and benefits of the final Growth Deal being set
out in detail, for consideration, when the final Deal was presented for
approval at a later date. The
Leader advocated the Proposition Document as the best opportunity to expand the
economy of North Wales and compete with other regions highlighting
the possible impact on Denbighshire specifically. The importance of Denbighshire aligning
itself to other economic plans and strategies through the Growth Deal was also
highlighted and it was noted that the Proposition Document was dependent on the
delivery of other rail and road investment strategies such as Growth Track 360
and the Welsh Government Trunk Road Programme.
The Leader drew attention to the commitment of both UK and Welsh
Governments to invest in the Growth Deal and highlighted the excellent
relationship between the six Council Leaders in partnership with further and
higher education and the private sector which had given confidence in that regard. Once the potential extent and context of the
Growth Deal was known, following agreement of Heads of Terms, a full risk
assessment and cost-benefit analysis could be undertaken. This would inform decision-making before the
region entered into commitments at the stage of final Growth Deal agreement
later in 2019. Risk analysis was built
into the business case modelling for the programmes and projects which made up
the developing Bid. All projects listed
in the Proposition Document had an outline business case to demonstrate their
value and worth. Other important issues
to note included – ·
the outline business cases were presently
being assessed by civil servants in Cardiff and Swansea ·
a stakeholder group for the private sector
had been established and challenge sessions had been conducted within the
region ·
a risk schedule was being developed as part
of the next stage – the Council’s financial commitments would become clearer
over the next few months when the extent of both Governments financial commitment
was known ·
if
Denbighshire signed up to the Growth Deal there would likely be further
opportunities following Brexit to engage the region into the Prosperity Fund. The Corporate Director: Economy and Public Realm explained the purpose of the Proposition Document to set out a package of bold measures and interventions to deliver sustainable economic growth in North Wales. He proceeded to guide Cabinet through the Proposition Document and pertinent points in relation to setting out the case for investment; strategic context and fit with government policy; option appraisal and preferred way forward; Growth Vision; project schedule list; economic case, finance and funding, empowering the region and the governance and delivery structure. The Chief Executive added ... view the full minutes text for item 4. |
|
ITEMS FROM SCRUTINY COMMITTEES - GYPSY AND TRAVELLER SITE PROVISION PDF 279 KB To consider any issues raised by Scrutiny Committee for Cabinet’s attention. Additional documents:
Decision: RESOLVED that Cabinet – (a) acknowledges Communities Scrutiny
Committee’s conclusions and recommendations following its review of the Cabinet
decisions of 25 September 2018; (b) having taken into account the recommendations
from Communities Scrutiny Committee and the further information provided at the
meeting confirms the decisions made on 25 September 2018 to – (i)
approve undertaking pre-planning consultation and
subsequent full planning applications (taking into consideration the outcomes
of the pre-planning exercise) for the residential and transit Gypsy and
Traveller sites on the Green-gates Farm East site in the locations indicated in
Appendix 1 to the report, and (ii)
approve the submission of funding bids to the Welsh
Government in respect of proposals for residential and/or transit Gypsy
Traveller sites subject to planning consent being granted in line with the
programme outlined in paragraph 4.11 of the report.” (c) the Lead Member liaise with Local
Members as to the most appropriate form and method of consultation with the
local community during the pre-planning consultation, and (d) in all matters to come before Cabinet for
a formal decision Lead Members do now and will in future consider the need to
brief and engage the wider membership and the most appropriate and
proportionate way to do this which could include Council Briefing, Scrutiny
Committee, Member Area Groups or workshops/training events. Minutes: Councillor
Graham Timms, Vice-Chair of Communities Scrutiny Committee presented the report
detailing the conclusions reached by the Scrutiny Committee following
consideration of the call-in of the Cabinet decision taken on 25 September 2018
in respect of Gypsy and Traveller Site provision. In
brief, whilst it was acknowledged that Cabinet had received and discussed
further information through Cabinet Briefings it was the Scrutiny Committee’s
view that insufficient comparable information had been provided in the Cabinet
report of 25 September 2018 to enable Cabinet to make an informed decision on
the most suitable site. Consequently
Cabinet had been asked to revisit their decision taking into account additional
information including comparable data for each site and the reasons why
locations included on an earlier list of potential sites had been
discounted. In addition the Scrutiny
Committee considered that Cabinet should have reported the matter to Council
Briefing for wider member input before making a formal decision and it was
recommended that this practice be followed in future when considering
potentially controversial decisions.
Finally Councillor Timms expressed his view on the timing of Cabinet’s
review of the decision and felt strongly that the late notification and
availability of the additional information requested by Scrutiny in this case
had left insufficient time for all councillors to fully digest that information
and make arrangements to attend and raise questions at the Cabinet
meeting. Therefore he urged Cabinet to
reconsider their decision on this issue at the next scheduled meeting on 30
October 2018 which would demonstrate that Cabinet had fully taken into account
Scrutiny’s recommendations. The
Head of Legal, HR and Democratic Services explained how the provisions of the
public notification legislation under the Local Government Act 1972 had been
met and also provided details of the Constitution’s call in rules. Having taken into account Scrutiny’s
recommendations Cabinet may consider reviewing the decision at this meeting or
defer to a future meeting. Lead Member
Councillor Tony Thomas provided some further background advising that the
project had been ongoing for some time and had never been called into Scrutiny
with Cabinet having confirmed a preference for the site in April 2018. After considering the issues raised by
Scrutiny and given that the information they had requested had been provided
Councillor Thomas proposed, seconded by Councillor Julian Thompson-Hill, that
Cabinet proceed to review their decision without delay. On that basis the Leader sought assurances
that Cabinet was satisfied they were able to make a fully informed decision and
upon being put to the vote it was RESOLVED ACCORDINGLY. Councillor Richard Mainon abstained from
voting on that proposition. Prior
to reviewing the decision Councillor Huw Hilditch-Roberts referred to Scrutiny
recommendation 3.3 for all councillors to be briefed on potentially
controversial decisions at Council Briefing and Cabinet supported his
proposition for an amendment to also include other briefing methods as
appropriate including Scrutiny Committee, Member Area Groups or
workshop/training events. EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC In
order to revisit the Cabinet decision of 25 September 2018 and consider the
detail of the confidential appendices it was – RESOLVED that under Section 100A of the Local Government Act
1972, the Press and Public be excluded from the meeting on the grounds that it
would involve the disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 14
of Part 4 of Schedule 12A of the Act. The Lead Officer – Corporate Property and Housing Stock reminded Cabinet of the Council’s statutory responsibilities in meeting the needs identified for the provision of Gypsy and Traveller Sites and detailed the comprehensive and lengthy process of site selection and assessment leading up to the current ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |