Agenda and draft minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, Russell House, Rhyl
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES |
|
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS Members to declare any personal or prejudicial interests in any business identified to be considered at this meeting. Minutes: No Members
declared any personal or prejudicial interests in any business identified to be
considered at the meeting. |
|
URGENT MATTERS AS AGREED BY THE CHAIR Notice of items which, in the opinion of the Chair, should be considered at the meeting as a matter of urgency pursuant to Section 100B(4) of the Local Government Act 1972. Minutes: No items were
raised which in the opinion of the Chair, should be considered at the meeting
as a matter of urgency pursuant to Section 100B(4) of
the Local Government Act, 1972. |
|
MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING PDF 167 KB To receive the minutes of the Performance Scrutiny Committee meeting held on the 24th September, 2015 (copy attached). Minutes: The Minutes of a meeting of
the Performance Scrutiny Committee held on Thursday, 24th September,
2015 were submitted. 4. Provisional Examination Results - The Scrutiny Coordinator confirmed that, as
agreed at the previous meeting, an information report on the retention and
progression of Denbighshire Sixth Forms had been circulated to Members of the
Committee. In reply to a question from Councillor M.Ll. Davies, the Scrutiny Coordinator explained that the
Monitoring Officer had confirmed that the relevant Regulations did not permit,
Committee Members who chaired meetings in the absence of the Chair of a
Committee, to be eligible for payment of an allowance for undertaking such
duties. The Scrutiny Co-ordinator informed members that
Councillor Arwel Roberts had chaired the above
meeting in the absence of the chair and that this should have been reflected in
the minutes. RESOLVED – that, subject
to the above amendment, the Minutes be received and approved as a correct
record. |
|
CSSIW ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 2014/15 PDF 61 KB To consider a report by the Principal Manager: Business Support, Community Support Services, which details the key issues arising from the Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales (CSSIW) evaluation of Denbighshire Social Services performance for 2014-15, had been circulated previously. 9.35 a.m. Additional documents: Minutes: A copy of a report by the Principal Manager: Business Support, Community Support Services
(PM: BS - CSS) had been circulated with the papers for the meeting. The Corporate
Director: Communities (CDC) introduced
the report and explained that the evaluation was based on a wide-range
of evidence from the Council, regulators and service users. On the whole
the Regulator’s evaluation of the Council’s Social Care Services was a positive
one, with just a few areas for improvement identified. The main areas on
which the Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales (CSSIW) would be
regularly liaising with the Council on during the current year with a view to ensuring
they would be strengthened or progressed were:- ·
The changes to the senior
management infrastructure for the delivery of social care and their impact upon
children and adults; ·
Protection of
Vulnerable Adults (PoVA) – improving the timeliness
and engagement of PoVA and undertaking a review of
threshold levels ·
Quality monitoring of all
domiciliary care providers (including obtaining service users’ views and
experiences of the services); and ·
Integrated partnership working
with the Betsi Cadwaladr
University Health Board (BCUHB) The CSSIW’s Regional Director for North Wales outlined to
the Committee the main points highlighted in the Regulator’s report. In
addition to the areas listed above which required strengthening she advised
that:- ·
A recent Wales Audit Office
(WAO) national study had concluded that greater use of Telecare
and assistive technology was needed across Wales, therefore the Regulators
would be monitoring the situation across the country; ·
With respect to the
need to improve the quality monitoring of domiciliary care providers, the
Council would need to have regard to a national report due to be published in
the spring of 2016 when developing this aspect of its work; ·
The 38% increase in the uptake
of direct payments for people with learning disabilities or mental health needs
was commendable; ·
Profiling of people with
mental health was an area for improvement across the North Wales region.
Clarity was required around the identification, assessment and commissioning of
services; ·
Denbighshire had an
exceptionally high number of people with learning disabilities, often with
complex needs, from outside the county living within its boundaries. They
mainly resided in accommodation run by independent providers, a number of which
had been established following the closure of the former North Wales
Hospital. As a number of the residents were from outside
Denbighshire there was a risk that they were not at present known to either
health or social care services, but there was likely to come a time when they
would need to access primary health and social care services and require the
protection of the Council’s safeguarding services. There was therefore a
need for the Council and its partners to assess potential future pressures on
their services; ·
The Council’s prevention and
early intervention approach through various teams working within the Children
and Family Services had resulted in a significant drop in referrals and
re-referrals to the Service. Nevertheless there was a need to track and
monitor outcomes for children and families signposted to other services; ·
As the
non-contributory respite care for children with disabilities had now ended
there would be a need to monitor whether some families were opting out of
receiving respite care on financial grounds, and the consequential impact that
was having on the entire family; ·
There would also be a
need to monitor access and outcomes for children and families who were
currently not meeting the threshold to directly access support from Children’s
Services – the new National Outcomes Framework (currently being piloted by
Denbighshire) would assist with this aspect; · Whilst ... view the full minutes text for item 5. |
|
CORPORATE PLAN - QUARTER 2 2015/16 PDF 86 KB To consider a report by the Strategic Planning and Performance Officer, which provides an update on the delivery of the Corporate Plan 2012/17 as at the end of quarter 2 of 2015/16, had been circulated previously.
10.10
a.m. Additional documents: Minutes: The Lead Member for Finance, Corporate Plan and Performance
introducing the Quarter 2 2015/16 report (previously circulated) on the
Council’s performance in delivering its Corporate Plan:- ·
advised that the indicators which relied on either the residents or business
surveys, were historical in nature
and would be updated next quarter with the most recent data. ·
highlighted the key areas of
performance listed in the report and advised that the Council was proposing to
delete performance indicator (PI) QSCC013ai – ‘the percentage of open cases on
the child protection register who have an allocated social worker’ as it was no
longer a statutory indicator and officers had agreed that it was not a meaningful PI
for measuring intended outcomes. They felt that the intended outcomes
could be better managed and achieved in other operational ways; ·
whilst corporate
sickness absence levels were continuing to improve this area remained a
priority for improvement; ·
the decrease in the number of
staff who had received a performance appraisal was at least in part
attributable to the i-Trent recording software
system. The Lead Member and officers were monitoring this aspect closely; ·
the Council’s inability to
provide information for carbon emissions at present was due to an issue
relating to its energy provider’s billing system. This problem was not
unique to Denbighshire, a high number of local authorities were affected and
the company was working on solutions to rectify the problem. However, the
Council was due to change its energy provider from April 2016 and the new
provider could provide all the required information in due course; ·
none of the Council’s
Corporate Projects were registering a ‘red’ status. Responding to members’ questions the Lead Member and
officers confirmed that:- ·
the decision to
change energy provider from April 2016 had been taken on commercial grounds; ·
both littering and dog fouling
could only be measured for performance purposes within 30 mile per hour (mph) zones.
However there were methods of tracking such activity outside 30mph areas; ·
officers from all Council
departments were now familiar and confident in using the Verto
system for the purpose of recording performance and project related
information; ·
they were confident that the
actual number of performance appraisals undertaken across the Council was
likely to be in the high eighty percent range. With a view to obtaining a
correct assessment of the Council’s performance in this area the Chief Executive
had asked all Heads of Service to check that they had inputted all the required
information into the i-Trent system. He had
also asked the Head of Legal, HR and Democratic Services to review the system
in order to determine the cause of the reporting problem; ·
the Tackling Poverty Working
Group had commenced its study. It was an ambitious Group and would soon
have a number of PIs which could be scrutinised; ·
scrutiny had no powers to
compel the Council’s energy provider to attend a meeting to discuss its
inability to provide carbon emissions information. It could however, if
it wished, invite them to attend. The Scrutiny Co-ordinator undertook to check on whether
proposed by-laws relating to banning dogs from school pitches and other playing
fields had ever been adopted. Members and officers were reminded that, if
they thought any of the areas listed in the Corporate Plan merited detailed
scrutiny, they should complete a ‘scrutiny proposal form’ and submit it to the
Scrutiny Co-ordinator for consideration by the Scrutiny Chairs and Vice-Chairs
Group. The Committee:- RESOLVED - subject to the above observations, to receive the report on the Council’s performance in delivering its Corporate Plan in ... view the full minutes text for item 6. |
|
CORPORATE RISK REGISTER PDF 70 KB To consider a report by the Strategic Planning Team Manager, which provided an update on the Council’s Corporate Risk Register, had been circulated previously.
10.55 a.m. Additional documents: Minutes: A copy of a report by the Strategic Planning Team Manager (SPTM) which detailed the October, 2015 formal revision of
the Corporate Risk Register (CRR), had been circulated with the agenda. A formally updated
version of the CRR had been agreed at Cabinet Briefing in October, and
presented to the Corporate Governance Committee on the 18th
November. The current report presented
the opportunity for Performance Scrutiny Committee to comment on the formal
revision. Introducing the report the Lead Member for Finance,
Corporate Plan and Performance made particular reference to the following
revisions to the CRR:- ·
DCC007 – the risk that
critical or confidential information is lost or disclosed: due to the introduction of a
number of risk reduction actions, the introduction of the information security
policy and e-learning package it was now felt that this risk could be managed
at a service level. Therefore it would be deleted from the CRR; ·
DCC013 – the wording for this risk
had been changed to ‘the risk of significant liabilities resulting from
external models of delivery’ to encompass the variety of service delivery
models either in operation or being explored. Until the Framework for
Governance Arrangements was fully implemented and embedded the residual risk
score would remain the same; ·
DCC021 - the residual
risk score for ‘the risk that effective partnerships and interfaces between Betsi Cadwaladr University Health
Board (BCUHB) and Denbighshire County Council (DCC) do not develop, leading to
significant misalignment between the strategic and operational direction of
BCUHB and DCC’ had been increased to reflect the serious concerns the Council
had for this particular area, despite the fact that a number of control measures
had been put in place; ·
A new risk had been entered on
to the register – DCC030 ‘the risk that appropriate capacity and skills to
sustain service and corporate performance is not available’. This risk
related to succession planning work which was currently underway. Some
control measures were already in place and others were planned with a view to
managing this risk; and ·
There was also another
emerging risk, this related to Protection of Vulnerable Adults (PoVA) arrangements which had been raised by the
CSSIW. Scoping work was currently underway on this risk and therefore
more detailed information on it and the measures to manage it would feature in
the next version of the CRR. Responding to Members’ questions the Lead Member and
officers:- ·
Advised that with respect to
risk DCC016 ‘the risk that the impact of welfare reforms is more significant
than anticipated by the council’ and in particular the risk associated with
closure of the Welfare Rights Unit and the transfer of its work to an external
provider, the Cutting Our Cloth Task and Finish Group had recently reviewed
this cut and concluded that the new service provided by the Citizens Advice
Bureau (CAB) was working well and delivering as expected. Assurances were
also given by the Scrutiny Co-ordinator that the Task and Finish Group would be
continuing to monitor the situation and was scheduled to examine the service
delivery against the service level agreement (SLA) again in the summer of
2016. · Requested that as some members had raised concerns at the meeting with respect to the CAB’s capacity to deliver the welfare advice service at present due to pressures, it would be useful if those members could detail their concerns to senior officers at the Council to enable them to be investigated, as the Task and finish Group had found no evidence of any detrimental effect on residents following the transfer of the service to ... view the full minutes text for item 7. |
|
To consider a report by the Principal Librarian / Customer Service Business Partner, which outlines the Library Service’s performance against Welsh Government’s Framework of Public Library Standards 2014-17, and considers this in the context of Denbighshire’s new Face to Face Customer Service Delivery Framework, had been circulated previously.
11.30 a.m. Additional documents:
Minutes: A copy of a joint
report by the Principal
Librarian (PL) and the Customer Service Business Partner (CSBP),
which outlined the Library Service’s
performance against the Welsh Government’s Framework of Public Library
Standards 2014-17, and seeking the Committee to consider this in the context of
Denbighshire’s new Face to Face Customer Service Delivery Framework, had
been circulated with the papers for the meeting. Details of the statutory duties of Library Authorities in Wales had had been outlined in the report,
particular reference being made to the requirements of the Public Libraries and
Museums Act 1964. The Frameworks of
Welsh Public Library Standards enabled
MALD (Museums Archives and
Libraries Division of Welsh
Government, previously CyMAL) to measure and
assess how Authorities were fulfilling their statutory duties. The Fifth Framework had been launched on the
1st May, 2014. The Lead Member for
Customers and Communities introduced the report on the WG’s Assessment of the
Library Service’s performance for 2014/15, which also informed members of the
work undertaken and planned with a view to developing libraries into community
hubs. The Principal Librarian detailed the report’s contents with respect
to the Library Service’s performance against WG standards, whilst the Customer
Service Business Partner explained the work in relation to developing libraries
into community hubs and the Framework associated with that work. Members were
advised that:- ·
17 out of the 18 Core
Entitlements in the Frameworks of Welsh Public Library Standards had been met,
the only one not achieved related to the availability of the Service’s Strategy
and Vision. This had not been met because the Service, as part of the Freedoms
and Flexibilities process had been restructuring. This final core
entitlement would be met by March 2016 as the vision would be available in
bilingual format on-line and printed by then; ·
With respect to the Quality
Indictors (QI) contained in the Standards Framework, and listed in the report,
the Council had only partially met the QI relating to access to up-to-date
reading materials and would not be meeting it in the current year either.
The Council was not unduly worried about this as book loans across the county
was high, which in itself was an indicator that the Service was purchasing what
readers wanted to read; ·
The QI relating to appropriate
spend on reading materials had also only been partially met – this was due to
the County taking the approach to give priority to purchasing books for
children. The Council was spending above the WG target on children’s
books with a view to improving basic reading and literacy skills, and was
pursuing this approach during the current year. Officials had met with
the WG’s Deputy Minister for Culture, Sport and Tourism to emphasise this
approach; ·
Another QI which had only been
partially met was the one relating to staffing levels and qualifications – this
would be looked at again in the light of the staffing restructure to see what
could be met in relation to the QI; and ·
The new Framework should help the
Council to achieve quality indicators relating to web pages and customer
take-up of ICT services. Responding to members’
questions the Lead Member and officers advised that:- ·
The fund for purchasing reading
materials for 2014/15 was £160K; ·
The new Museums, Archives and
Libraries Division (MALD) Framework was rather prescriptive and focussed too
much on inputs rather than on outputs, outcomes and benefits for citizens, which was what Denbighshire’s Library Service
wanted to concentrate on; · Meetings had been held with both the WG’s Deputy Minister for Culture, Sport and Tourism and the Director ... view the full minutes text for item 8. |
|
SCRUTINY WORK PROGRAMME PDF 72 KB To consider a report by the Scrutiny Coordinator (copy enclosed) seeking a review of the committee’s forward work programme and updating members on relevant issues.
12.05 p.m. Additional documents:
Minutes: A copy of a report by the
Scrutiny Coordinator (SC), which requested the Committee to review and
agree its Forward Work Programme and provided an update on relevant issues, had been circulated with the
papers for the meeting. A copy of the
‘Member’s proposal form’ had been included in Appendix 2. The Cabinet Forward Work Programme
had been included as Appendix 3, and a table summarising
recent Committee resolutions and advising on progress with their
implementation, had been attached at Appendix 4. The Committee considered its draft Forward
Work Programme for future meetings, Appendix 1, and the following amendments
and additions were agreed:- 28th January, 2016: at
the request of the Scrutiny Chairs and Vice Chairs Group, following their
meeting held on the 15th October, 2015, the Committee agreed to
include a business item in the forward work programme on the Primary School
Transport Policy. The Committee agreed that Lead Members
Councillors E.W. Williams and H.C. Irving be invited to attend the meeting. 14th July, 2016: following
the receipt of a request from the Scrutiny Chairs and Vice Chairs Group,
emanating from their meeting held on the 3rd December 2015, Members
agreed that a business item be included in the forward work programme with a
view to monitoring the Local Housing Strategy, particular reference being made
to Theme 2 which incorporated Affordable Housing. The Committee’s representative on the
Corporate Equalities Group (CEG), Councillor C. Hughes, had recently requested
that a new Member be appointed as the Committee’s representative. Councillor Hughes had indicated that he was
willing to be the Committee’s substitute representative on the CEG. A copy of the Group’s terms of reference had
been included as Appendix 5. As the Committee was unable nominate a
representative Councillor Hughes agreed to continue in post, with Councillor G.Lloyd-Williams as a substitute, until a greater
compliment of Committee Members were in attendance and the Committee was in a
better position to nominate a new representative. RESOLVED – that, subject
to the above amendments and agreements, the Work Programme as set out in
Appendix 1 to the report be approved. |
|
FEEDBACK FROM COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES To receive any
updates from Committee representatives on various Council Boards and Groups.
12.15 p.m. Minutes: The Committee were informed by Councillor M.Ll. Davies that he had attended the Planning and Public
Protection Service Challenge meeting, held on the 25th November,
2015. Councillor Davies advised that a
representative from National Resources Wales (NRW) was present at the
meeting. He proceeded to provide a brief
summary of the following business items which had been considered at the
meeting:- ·
Planning charges ·
Dangerous buildings ·
CCTV ·
Public Realm issues The Scrutiny Coordinator informed Members that the
Partnerships Scrutiny Committee would be considering a business item relating
to CCTV at its meeting in January, 2016. RESOLVED
– that the report be received and noted. Meeting ended at 12.55 p.m |