Agenda and draft minutes
Venue: CONFERENCE ROOM 1b, COUNTY HALL, RUTHIN
No. | Item |
---|---|
APOLOGIES Minutes: No apologies were received. |
|
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS Members to declare any personal or prejudicial interests in any business identified to be considered at this meeting. Minutes: The following interests were identified in business items to
be considered at the meeting. Agenda Item 3:- “Application to extend the Dispensation to
Members of Rhyl Town Council” – A personal and prejudicial interest was declared
by Councillor B. Mellor. The reason for the declaration was that the
respective Committee Member was a Member of Rhyl Town Council. |
|
APPLICATION TO EXTEND THE DISPENSATION TO MEMBERS OF RHYL TOWN COUNCIL PDF 45 KB To consider a report by the Deputy Monitoring Officer (copy
enclosed) to extend a dispensation granted
on the 6th March, 2015 by a further 12 months. Additional documents: Minutes: Councillor B.
Mellor vacated the meeting at this point. The Deputy
Monitoring Officer (DMO) submitted a report (previously circulated) on the
application made to extend, by a further 12 months, the dispensation which had
been granted on the 6th March 2015.
Rhyl Town Council had requested the Committee reconsider the
dispensation and were seeking an extension.
The original report dated the 6th March, 2015 had been
attached as Appendix 1. The DMO explained that it had been requested that the Committee grant a
dispensation, pursuant to Regulation
2(a) and (d) of the Standards Committees (Grant of Dispensations) (Wales)
Regulations 2001, to full Council, including those new Members of the Town
Council, based on the terms as originally granted. The dispensation granted on the 6th
March, 2015 had been granted in accordance with the conditions set out below:- (i) the Dispensation applies only to
matters considered by Rhyl Town Council relating to the Rhyl in Bloom Committee
(or such other name it is replaced by); (ii) the
Members must still declare a personal interest at the meeting(s) at which such
items are discussed. They may then speak and vote in so far as they are
permitted to do so by this Dispensation; (iii) the Dispensation will apply for 12
months from the date of this Standards Committee meeting (6 March 2015).
Thereafter, the Clerk of Rhyl Town Council is to apply in writing to the
Monitoring Officer for an extension to the Dispensation and setting the Rhyl in
Bloom Committee (or such other name it is replaced by) activities; (iv) on
election of a new Member, the Clerk of Rhyl Town Council to notify the
Monitoring Officer in writing for the Dispensation to be applied to the new
Member. Since the original
dispensation had been granted Councillors Stanley Frederick Walker, Jacquie McAlpine and Anthony Thomas had been elected to the Council
and would require to be included in the dispensation. Mr Gareth Nickels,
Clerk to Rhyl Town Council (CRTC), was in attendance and provided a summary of
the application, and details of Rhyl Town Council Members involvement and
activities in relation to the Rhyl in Bloom Committee. At this point the CRTC vacated the meeting. The
following concerns and issues were raised by Members of the Committee:- -
Independent
Member, J. Hughes (JH) referred to 4. (iv) of the report “on
election of a new Member, the Clerk of Rhyl Town Council to notify the
Monitoring Officer in writing for the Dispensation to be applied to the new
Member”. She expressed concern that a newly appointed Member could
be granted Dispensation without referral to the Monitoring Officer or the
Standards Committee, which might be perceived as a form of prejudice or a
weakness in the process. -
Members
felt that the dispensation should be granted to all current Members of the Rhyl Town Council, and that the Monitoring
Officer be informed in writing of the election of any new Member or Members,
and any new appointments should be subject to an Application for Dispensation. -
The Committee supported the suggestion that the
period of the Dispensation be from the 8th April, 2016 to the 4th May, 2017, the date of the
Local Government Elections. -
It was
noted that there had been no adverse publicity in relation to Rhyl Town Council
Members and any links with the Rhyl in Bloom Committee. - The Chair commended Rhyl Town Council for their actions in complying with the proper procedures and submitting an Application for a Dispensation. Members felt it would be important not ... view the full minutes text for item 3. |
|
CHANGES TO THE MODEL CODE OF CONDUCT PDF 53 KB To consider a report by the Monitoring Officer (copy
enclosed) on the proposed changes made
to the Model Code of Conduct for Wales. Additional documents: Minutes: The Monitoring
Officer submitted a report (previously circulated) on the proposed changes made
to the Model Code of Conduct for Wales as a result of a recent statutory
instrument signed by the Minister for Public Services entitled Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct) (Wales)
(Amendment) Order 2016. The Deputy Monitoring Officer (DMO) advised
Members of the proposed changes to the Code of Conduct brought about by the
Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct) (Wales) (Amendment) Order 2016, (the
Order). The Minister for Public
Services had signed the Order which had come into effect from 1st
April, 2016. The Order made changes to the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) applicable to
Members of Local Authorities (LA’s) in Wales.
Every LA would be obliged to adopt a Code of Conduct for its Members,
which included all of the provisions of the MCC. LA’s may adopt a Code of Conduct which
contained additional provisions to those of the Model provided that those
additions did not detract from the effect of the Model provisions. Denbighshire’s Code of Conduct differed from the existing Model in two
respects. Firstly, it contained a requirement that all Members attend training
on the Code of Conduct at least once in every term. Secondly it placed a value of £25 over which
any gifts or hospitality must be declared.
This provision had been adopted to avoid inadvertent breach of the Code
by Members. It was suggested that these
variations from the new Model Code be retained.
Members agreed that details pertaining to the value of gifts or
hospitality to be declared, be conveyed to the City, Town and Community
Councils. The Order changed the MCC in the
following ways:- ·
Paragraph 10(2)(b) was omitted from the
MCC. This paragraph had caused
difficulties in the past given the difference between the policy intention of
its inclusion and a strict interpretation of the language used in the
paragraph. A strict interpretation of the paragraph, as worded, could preclude
Members from participating in any decision affecting their ward whereas the
underlying policy intention was to limit the scope of this provision to
decisions made by individual Councillors in the exercise of executive
functions. The removal of the paragraph
avoided this ambiguity. ·
The obligation on a Member to report a
potential breach of the Code to the Ombudsman was removed. The requirement to report such a breach to
the Monitoring Officer was retained. ·
Paragraph 15 of the MCC deals with the register of Member’s
interests and was amended to clarify that any interest disclosed for the first
time by a Member must be entered in the register. The exemption for Town and Community
Councillors from the requirement to register, in advance, certain financial and
other interests, listed in paragraph 10(2)(a) of the Code, was maintained. ·
The Local Government (Democracy) (Wales) Act 2013 transferred
responsibility for maintaining the register of interests of Members of Town and
Community Councils from the Monitoring Officer of the County Council for the
area to the “Proper Officer” of each Town and Community Council with effect
from 1st May, 2015. These changes were
reflected in the new Model Code in paragraphs 15(3) and 15(6). The Minister for Public Services had also brought into effect the Local Government (Standards Committees, Investigations, Dispensations and Referral) (Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2016. These Regulations made a number of technical amendments to other regulations relating to the ethical agenda. Local Authorities would be able to establish Joint Standards Committees should they wish to do so. Standards Committees (SC) would be able to delay the publication of agendas connected to their consideration of a misconduct ... view the full minutes text for item 4. |