Issue - meetings
DEVELOPING 'AN EXCELLENT COUNCIL CLOSE TO THE COMMUNITY'
Meeting: 30/07/2013 - Cabinet (Item 6)
6 DEVELOPING 'AN EXCELLENT COUNCIL CLOSE TO THE COMMUNITY' PDF 148 KB
To consider a report by Councillor Hugh Irving, Lead Member for Customers and Communities (copy enclosed) seeking Cabinet’s approval of the Council’s approach to progressing the theme of Bringing the Council Closer to the Community.
Additional documents:
Decision:
RESOLVED that Cabinet –
(a) endorses the refreshed approach to the
definition of being An Excellent Council Close to the Community as set out in
Appendix 1 to the report;
(b) requires
all services to develop their own plans in order to respond positively to the
four themes outlined in the overview plan set out in Appendix 1 to the report,
and
(c) endorses a review
of Member Area Group (MAG) activity to ensure that there were opportunities to
feedback and gauge the views of communities at a locality level.
Minutes:
Councillor Hugh Irving, Lead Member for
Customers and Communities presented the report seeking Cabinet’s approval of
the Council’s approach to progressing the ambition of
‘Bringing the Council Closer to the Community’.
An overview of the how the Council engaged with communities and its
revised approach had been detailed in appendices to the report.
The Corporate Director: Customers (CDC) elaborated
upon the identified priorities for the Council in order to bring the Council
closer to the community with four new themes and associated actions. He highlighted the involvement of all
services in supporting the corporate approach which would be continually
monitored through the Action Plan, the Corporate Plan and via the Service
Challenge Process.
Cabinet acknowledged the achievements designed
to bring the council closer to the community and
provided some positive examples of successful engagement with the public. The importance of engagement and interaction
with communities was highlighted but it was also recognised that public
perception was less positive when consultation focused on particular issues where
difficult and unpopular decisions had to be made. Councillor Eryl
Williams highlighted the negativity surrounding school reviews in particular
and felt there would be some merit in removing the reference to ‘close to the
community’ in the mission statement and to concentrate on the more positive
aspect of being ‘An Excellent Council’.
In view of the worsening financial climate more difficult and unpopular
decisions would need to be made which would also impact negatively on public
perception. During the ensuing debate it
was generally accepted that there would be negative public perception arising
from specific issues but there was a need for the Council to show their
commitment to become close to the community.
The importance of the Council being open and transparent in its dealings
and in the way consultations were carried out was highlighted and to listen and
engage with the community. It was
accepted that the council could be close to the community but still unpopular
because their decisions would not gain everyone’s support. Councillor Bobby Feeley
felt it was important to ensure that the public understood that difficult
decisions had to be made.
Members also highlighted the difficulties in
measuring the success of the new approach and sought more definite measureable
outcomes. Whilst various monitoring
strategies had been mentioned, including the action plan, feedback from various
forums and complaints/compliments and surveys, it was acknowledged there was no
definitive measure of success. As the
issue involved culture change it was difficult to quantify but there was a
commitment and expectation to succeed and strategies employed to deliver the
ambition. Officers responded to further
questions as follows –
·
acknowledged
the need for commitment from officers highlighting the involvement of services within
the process
·
elaborated
upon the two way process of the City/Town/Community Council Charter and the
continual monitoring of its effectiveness
·
two
town/community councils had failed to sign up to the Charter, one being Llandrillo who had not signed up because of their area’s
school review
·
the
checklist (Appendix 3 circulated at the meeting) would be used to monitor how
services were responding to the needs of customers, and
·
the new website
would be launched publicly on 19 August and would be more interactive to enable
the public to communicate easily with the Council.
Councillor Huw Hilditch-Roberts reported upon the mixed views of Communities Scrutiny Committee when considering the report and highlighted the need for an effective community engagement plan and a revamp of the Town/Community Council Charter to make it more appealing. He also highlighted the need to make greater use of technology to engage with communities, particularly young people. Councillor ... view the full minutes text for item 6