Issue - meetings
REACTIVE MAINTENANCE FRAMEWORK FOR SCHOOLS AND NON-SCHOOLS PROPERTIES
Meeting: 25/05/2021 - Cabinet (Item 6)
6 REACTIVE MAINTENANCE FRAMEWORK FOR SCHOOLS AND NON-SCHOOLS PROPERTIES PDF 129 KB
To consider a report by Councillor Julian Thompson-Hill, Lead Member for Finance, Performance and Strategic Assets (copy enclosed) seeking Cabinet approval to re-tender the Council’s reactive maintenance framework for schools and non-schools properties.
Additional documents:
- REACTIVE MAINTENANCE FRAMEWORK - Vol 1 ITT maintenance framework, item 6 PDF 402 KB
- REACTIVE MAINTENANCE FRAMEWORK - Assessment, item 6 PDF 100 KB
- Webcast for REACTIVE MAINTENANCE FRAMEWORK FOR SCHOOLS AND NON-SCHOOLS PROPERTIES
Decision:
RESOLVED that Cabinet
approves the re-tendering of the Reactive Maintenance Framework for Schools and
Non-Schools Properties to ensure the Council received best value from its
maintenance contractors.
Minutes:
Councillor
Julian Thompson-Hill presented the report seeking Cabinet approval to re-tender
the Council’s reactive maintenance framework for schools and non-schools
properties. The previous framework had
been tendered on a four year timescale and had reached the end of that term and
needed to be re-tendered.
The
Council’s Property Maintenance Team provided a day to day reactive property
repair service to both schools and non-schools.
Contractors were chosen following a tendering exercise based on cost and
quality and their area of expertise.
Works were allocated to contractors by the property maintenance helpdesk
who acted as the primary point of contact between building users and
contractors. The current framework was
due for re-tendering and was expected to be awarded on a two year contract with
the option to extend on a 1 plus 1 basis, totalling a potential four year
contract. The annual spend on repairs
and maintenance was circa £2m per annum totalling £8m over the life of the
framework. Works were broken down into
six lots with the intention to allocate contractors to each lot in the
framework with a suite of key performance indicators to ensure quality of work
and value for money.
In
response to questions the Lead Member and officers advised that –
·
works up
to £10k would be subject to a direct award to one of the contractors in the
relevant lot who had already been through the screening process and had
demonstrated quality and value for money through the monitoring process. Given the high volume of low value works a
direct award provided an efficient means of ensuring those works were carried
out in a timely manner, similarly with any urgent works required. However for those higher value works closer
to £10k it was usual practice to undertake a mini competition within the
framework
·
Councillor Emrys Wynne raised concerns
regarding the wording in the tender document (paragraph 2.1, and subsequent
paragraph 8.1.1) as he considered it related to inequality between the Welsh
and English languages and he asked that the reference be removed. The Head of Legal, HR and Democratic Services
explained that the reference had been included to safeguard the council against
any inaccuracies by the external translators but understood the point
made. He agreed to seek a review of the
wording and take advice from the solicitors thereon.
RESOLVED that Cabinet
approves the re-tendering of the Reactive Maintenance Framework for Schools and
Non-Schools Properties to ensure the Council received best value from its
maintenance contractors.