Issue - meetings
REVIEW OF A LICENCE TO DRIVE HACKNEY CARRIAGE AND PRIVATE HIRE VEHICLES - DRIVER NO. 510104
Meeting: 08/03/2017 - Licensing Committee (Item 5)
5 REVIEW OF A LICENCE TO DRIVE HACKNEY CARRIAGE AND PRIVATE HIRE VEHICLES - DRIVER NO. 510104
To consider a confidential report by the Head of Planning and Public Protection (copy enclosed) seeking members’ review of a licence to drive hackney carriage and private hire vehicles in respect of Driver No. 510104.
Additional documents:
- Restricted enclosure 3 , View reasons restricted (5/2)
- Restricted enclosure 4 , View reasons restricted (5/3)
Decision:
RESOLVED that the renewal application for a hackney
carriage and private hire vehicle driver’s licence
from Driver No. 510104 be refused.
Minutes:
A confidential report by the Head of Planning
and Public Protection (previously circulated) was submitted upon –
(i)
the
suitability of Driver No. 510104 to hold a licence to
drive hackney carriage and private hire vehicles following an accrual of six penalty
points on his DVLA driving licence for using a motor
vehicle uninsured against third party risk in October 2015 which had been
revealed following a routine check as part of his renewal application;
(ii)
the
Driver having failed to declare the motoring conviction at the time of
conviction or as part of his renewal application as required by licensing
conditions;
(iii)
the
Council’s policy with regard to the relevance of convictions, and
(iv)
the
Driver having been invited to attend the meeting in support of his renewal
application and to answer members’ questions thereon.
The Driver confirmed that he had received the
committee report and procedures.
The Enforcement Officer (LJ) presented the
report and detailed facts of the case.
In mitigation the Driver explained that he
genuinely believed his vehicle had been insured and his insurance company had
admitted a clerical error when questioned in relation to the insurance. He provided assurances that there had been no
deliberate attempt to deceive on his part.
The Driver responded to members’ questions and elaborated upon the
circumstances surrounding the offence and his actions and accepted that he
could have provided some evidence to support his version of events. With regard to the non-disclosure of the
conviction the Driver referred to his personal circumstances at the time
advising that the conviction had genuinely slipped his mind and he did not
drive taxis on a full time basis. In his
final statement the Driver reiterated that he had made a genuine mistake in not
disclosing the conviction.
At this juncture the
committee adjourned to consider the application and it was –
RESOLVED that the renewal application for a hackney
carriage and private hire vehicle driver’s licence
from Driver No. 510104 be refused.
The reasons for the
Licensing Committee’s decision were as follows –
Members had carefully
considered the facts of the case and mitigation put forward by the Driver and
his response to questions. The committee
had found there to be anomalies between the account given by the Driver at the
meeting and his witness statement which did not reflect well on his credibility
and he had provided no evidence to support his version of events. With regard to his non-disclosure, the
renewal application form clearly requested details of any motoring
convictions. Consequently the committee
believed that the Driver had deliberately failed to disclose the conviction in
order to secure renewal of his licence and had
knowingly made a false statement. The
committee’s overriding consideration was protection of the public. In view of the Driver’s blatant disregard of
the rules and deliberate attempt to deceive the committee did not consider him
a fit and proper person to hold a licence and
resolved to refuse the renewal application.
The committee’s
decision and reasons therefore were conveyed to the Driver and he was advised
of his right of appeal.